Based on my ten months of experience, I would rate Azure's stability as seven out of ten. It's important to note that stability can also be influenced by factors such as pricing tiers and other considerations. While there is room for improvement and potential enhancements, I can affirm that Azure's current stability is satisfactory.

We had some issues with Azure's stability but overall I would say that the solution is stable. I give it an eight out of ten. You need to have a stable infrastructure. In case of severe data center issues that affect the platform stability, Microsoft and hardware vendor support have very competent teams and will help you bring the cluster online.

It provides excellent stability.

It is a stable solution.

The product has remained stable so far in our company.

The tool is very stable.

The solution is stable. 

I rate Azure Stack a ten out of ten for stability. Azure Stack is very stable. We just had one glitch in five years, and the glitch was for a couple of hours. So, Azure Stack's stability is very good.

The solution is stable. 

It is absolutely stable.

It is definitely stable and I would rate it nine or eight out of ten.

The solution is extremely stable. 

It's extremely stable unless and until someone from the operations team messes with it.

In a heavy-load cloud environment, I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

Microsoft data centers are tier-four data centers. Tier four is a certification from the Uptime Institute, which makes sure that the data center standards are being met in regard to the end customer service availability. Tier four has the highest rating, which is the 99.49% of service availability. This means that if anything goes wrong at the data center in the Microsoft infrastructure, they have a failover backup so that the customer wouldn't even feel that the service is down and there would be not any interruption for the end customer.

It is very stable. I would rate it a nine out of ten. 

This is a stable solution. 

I rate the tool's stability an eight out of ten. 

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

It is a stable solution.

Azure Stack is highly stable across the globe from my experience.

It's stable. We haven't had any significant down times, because now you have redundancy across networks. We have not come across any situation where any disruptions have occurred, at least on the cloud connectivity.

The solution is stable enough. It is not market-leading, however, it is reliable. 

Azure Stack is a stable product.

Azure Stack is stable. 

I rate Azure Stack a nine out of ten for stability.

I rate the product’s stability an eight out of ten.

It's not stable as IBM solutions. It fully supports all the .NET solutions, but our main applications are based in Java. So in those cases, we've had some minor problems with Azure, but Microsoft always says that it can handle this stuff.

Azure Stack is stable.

Azure Stack is highly stable.

The stability is okay, however, there are a few glitches here and there. 

We have had no complaints with respect to stability.

The product is stable, unfortunately, if sizing is correctly repeated during the design phase. There's no issue in Azure Stack.

The solution is certainly stable. 

The solution is pretty stable.

Azure Stack is very stable.

The stability is good. We haven't had any issues with the viability or scalability. It's been good so far.

The solution is quite stable. We've never faced any issues so far.

This product is stable. I would say 'yes' to that twice over.  

I cannot really tell what the stability is like because I am only using the Azure Stack in an evaluation environment. I have just now put it under a heavy workload to test whether it is stable enough for our production environment.

The program is very stable.

There is one bug we are facing now. In one of the organizations in which we have deployed Azure, when we are moving the VM from node A to node B, sometimes it gets stuck. We already raised the case with Microsoft. They are working on it with us. We involved the hardware and software teams from Microsoft. They gave us a solution and now the issue is under observation.

We have not really had any problems with bugs or glitches.

It is a stable solution.

I have had no issues with stability.

In our small testing environment, we had no problem with stability. However, we already created special technologies, so it's an evaluation of all the environments that we'll bring to do the final project because they have something created on their own technology and now it is a question if they will change it or not.

This solution is definitely stable.

It's pretty stable.

It's a stable product.

It's a cloud concept, so we expect stability but it's broad scoping with IT. I have been working in the field for the last 18 years and stability is affected by new technologies. We are told that new systems are quite stable, but we are still struggling to provide a service that is a reliable one. This is because of the different complicated scenarios, demands, and requirements from the end-user.

The cloud is challenging and from a stability point of view, it depends on what services you are running inside and what scalability you are providing to the end-user.

There are some minor issues or bugs with it that I know are there.

Azure Stack is stable.