We performed a comparison between AgilePoint and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management."
"I like the design and the integration capacity. It's also easy to use."
"The initial setup of AgilePoint was very easy."
"AgilePoint has improved our organization by making form implementation easier and to plan for future growth."
"The solution's workflows are its most useful feature."
"Decreased time for plane departures and landing, supported analytical insight for planning of three to six month forecasting, and helped with operational decision planning and support."
"The user interface and the ease of developing the workflow for an application are valuable features."
"The ability to define processes, build reports, and get insights or analytics on data is most valuable. It is a powerful platform."
"Case Management, as well as Workflow Automation, are Pega's most powerful capabilities."
"The most valuable features of Pega BPM are low code, no code, functionality, and easy development."
"The solution is operating well overall."
"There is a feature to accelerate the development so that business analysts can directly create their user stories and assign the task to the developers."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the various workflows."
"While the platform is good and it has a lot of options, I would like to see more alternative features in future versions such as connectors to IDM. Currently, they have only ADFS and Okta."
"They should add more information about functionality."
"It could be more flexible, but it's already a good solution for the designer."
"The solution should be able to support Docker. This would help make scalability easier."
"Some issues with AgilePoint's design, AI and UX are some of the major problems we deal with when handling our company's business models or processes."
"What should be included is some UI features and maybe some integrations. This includes documentation on how the UI works."
"Business specific functionality is needed."
"The workflow automation can be slow, so there is room for improvement there."
"Pega BPM could be improved by including token-based authentication and extending its integration options."
"Pega BPM could improve the UI, it is poorly designed to have a good UX experience."
"In the next release of Pega BPM, they should add more ways to do the customer interaction fields in the portals."
"Pega Cloud early adoption and use for cross enterprise capability was new to many. The early adoption meant version 2.0 of their cloud service may require refactoring and redesign of some services."
"Compared to other BPM products, the interface is somewhat complex, so the usability could be improved."
AgilePoint is ranked 32nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 5 reviews while Pega BPM is ranked 3rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 55 reviews. AgilePoint is rated 8.0, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AgilePoint writes " An affordable tool to create workflows requiring an easy initial setup phase". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Low code with great APIs and good flexibility". AgilePoint is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Mendix, OutSystems, Nintex Process Platform and IBM BPM, whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and IBM BPM. See our AgilePoint vs. Pega BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors, best Rapid Application Development Software vendors, and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.