Anonymous UserSenior Performance Engineer at a financial services firm
Mudassir Parwez AhmedSr. Technical Consultant at a tech services company
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the ability to discover and track transactions."
"The feature that is most valuable to us is the snapshot feature. It allows us to get a snapshot of different SQL scripts that are being executed simultaneously and we can identify everything we need on them."
"The product is stable and the technical support is good."
"The solution is very, very stable. We haven't faced any bugs or glitches on the system."
"To be honest, it's a fantastic product."
"The product is easy to install, it took about half an hour. The use and the configurations are simple as well."
"The event management part of TrueSight Operations Management, in my experience, is probably the best in the market. You have endless flexibility. You can build your own rules, you have the MRL language, and you can implement any kind of logic on the alerts. It may be correlation, abstraction, or executing something as a result of the alerts. You have almost the whole range of options available for event management using the available customization."
"The solution has a very good business event manager tool."
"I like the deep-dive detail and end-user metrics data. The synthetic monitor is the best one. The best point of the new one is that there's no need for configuration. You can inject the Java script and start to change major developments in the application. This is a good approach, and we received all the data using this."
"The user access management could be a bit better."
"The application monitoring needs improvement. It needs to be easier for someone who isn't a proficient developer."
"The product lost its place as an industry leader."
"The setup, implementation and use are clumsy and need to be refined."
"An improvement could be if the monitoring was able to be summarized into something more clear and simple for people who don't have the technical skills on the database side."
"The scalability could be improved."
"The networking monitor function could be better, we are not getting many details from it."
"It's too complex, too many servers are required, there are too many different components in the solution, and a lot of agents are required."
"The solution is overly complex."
"I would like them to improve the deep-dive details, tracing, and data agents in this product. We have EUEM, an end-user experience monitoring appliance. This one's quicker than the current one, and reporting side and filtration side are very bad. There are many details we look at and explain what we receive information in the current one, but we cannot have historical data like we do with EUEM. We cannot have a powerful point to look for specific traffic from a specific application and a specific browser. We don't have it in the new one. The current BMC also needs to add the thing that control versions."
"Pricing is based on the size of the deployment."
"Consider scalability very carefully: how much you want to monitor and what components are very important. Then, depending on these two things, filter out unwanted metrics or attributes. If you do a good job at filtering the data, then your licensing costs will be manageable."
More than half of application performance bottlenecks originate in the database, but most application teams have little or no visibility into database performance. With AppDynamics' database performance management product, you get 100% visibility into application performance, from the browser to the database.
TrueSight Operations Management is a broad ITOM solution that delivers performance monitoring, event management, end user experience management, AIOps use cases and automated remediation and ticketing . It deploys machine learning and analytics to dynamically learn behavior, correlate, analyze, and prioritize event data so IT operations teams can predict, find and fix issues faster across complex, hybrid environments. TrueSight Operations Management provides a converged view of application and infrastructure performance across physical, virtual, multi-cloud and container environments. With visibility into web, mobile, and on-premises applications, TrueSight provides the insight IT operations needs to deliver high-quality digital services quickly and effectively enough to keep pace with business demands. TrueSight helps IT to ensure that the applications and services that drive the business continue to perform optimally by examining operational norms, automatically revealing abnormalities, measuring service impact, and proactively identifying risk.
AppDynamics Database Monitoring is ranked 14th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 6 reviews while BMC TrueSight Operations Management is ranked 12th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 3 reviews. AppDynamics Database Monitoring is rated 7.2, while BMC TrueSight Operations Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AppDynamics Database Monitoring writes "While this is still a good solution for database monitoring it has fallen from its place as a leader in the field". On the other hand, the top reviewer of BMC TrueSight Operations Management writes "Monitors a mix of on-prem and cloud, and predictive alerts help maintain availability". AppDynamics Database Monitoring is most compared with AWS X-Ray, Dynatrace, Splunk, ITRS Geneos and Broadcom DX Application Performance Management, whereas BMC TrueSight Operations Management is most compared with BMC Helix Monitor, Dynatrace, Splunk, SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor and AppDynamics. See our AppDynamics Database Monitoring vs. BMC TrueSight Operations Management report.
See our list of best Application Performance Management (APM) vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.