BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs CA Performance Management

BMC TrueSight Operations Management is ranked 15th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 8 reviews vs CA Performance Management which is ranked 10th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 19 reviews. The top reviewer of BMC TrueSight Operations Management writes "Before choosing this product, we evaluated other options, and we still do. Mainly, it ends in a mixture of tools, and using open source-based tools reporting up into it". The top reviewer of CA Performance Management writes "Enables us to baseline, trend, historically view performance, and see in real time how the infrastructure is performing". BMC TrueSight Operations Management is most compared with AppDynamics APM, IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus and SCOM. CA Performance Management is most compared with CA eHealth, SevOne and HPE OneView. See our BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs CA Performance Management report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Bmc truesight operations management vs. ca performance management report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs CA Performance Management and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring.
270,647 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs CA Performance Management

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
Valuable features include wide support for monitoring, strong event management, service management capability, baselining (analytics) and easy to integrate other tools with it.It provides common administration, and a Single Sign-On Platform with RBAC, which eases the cross launch between multiple toolsThe tailoring of the knowledge modules has been particularly useful as I can streamline the agents to only report on critical events.It is very helpful to be able to apply rule-based routing to alerts.TSOM's ability to consolidate alerts into a single location and provide filtering of alerts is great.It has provided us with a single location to host all events to be viewed/monitored by our NOC. This has greatly helped them to streamline their processes.It allows our operations team to have one single application to reference when investigating issues in our environment.Signature baselines, which have allowed us to fine tune many of our events and significantly reduce the number of events generated.

Read more »

You can create intelligent alerts so you have enough time to replace the router or interface before it's full. The same is applicable for CBQoS channels.​It is the gathering of the whole performance data in our environment and our network environment, for us and our customers.You can have thousands of devices inside and hundreds of thousands of interphases without a problem.We're able to present data from multiple back-end collection sources into a single dashboard for the users. So they don't have to go to multiple locations to get data about a particular item, or device.It gave us one location, one place to do all of group administration, and to build dashboards, and device administration, inventory counts... it really reduced our overall administrative overhead.Scalability is the reason we bought the product to begin with. It was designed from the ground up for carrier-grade services, and we are in effect a MSP ourselves. So we were really interested in looking at something to be able to handle the multi-tenancy and scale as large as possible. This was the only solution that we really considered at that level.It is very easy to add devices; just be aware that it requires SNMP to be enabled.There is a good amount of vendor certification which comes with the product. That's all factory-loaded, no need to load any custom-made files. Most of the metrics are calibrated and captured from the devices based on the defaults available from vendor certification.

Read more »

Cons
Deployment requires lots of resources (servers). It has too many consoles.The knowledge modules could be more lightweight in size. At present, the installation packages can be quite large.BMC's solutions for cloud monitoring (monitoring of AWS and Azure resources) are very poor in stability and customization.BMC's online documentation is often incorrect or incomplete.I would really like to see out-of-the-box support for monitoring uninterruptible power supplies.More modules for less popular applications and better documentation.I think the ease of deployment needs to be looked at. It would be great if the deployment was faster and easier.The sizing (which is difficult), the maintenance of it and the upgrade paths. This is a difficult area which is not easy to cover, as every client has a different approach of implementing the product.

Read more »

The quantity of views which are tied to specific metric families is too high. Also, the problem is the view doesn't tell you which metric family it uses, so you don't know why you don't see data.For CA PM, there should be a way of easily migrating the reports coming from eHealth going to CA Performance Center, since CA PC is replacing eHealth.It needs role-based administration.Product has issue collecting IP SLA data.Install is done as root, which is a security no-no, and the database IO requirements were not stated correctly, which lead to a year of instability.CA PM Business Hours Filtering: I understand that all monitoring systems have defects. The Business Hours Filtering does not always function properly. Sometimes, when applying business hours to CA PM reports that are 30 or more days in duration, the report generation times out and does not display results. We have other CA PM reports that, when we apply Business Hours Filtering, the report results displayed are the same as without the filter. We are not sure if this is a defect in CA PM or if it is a result of our complex configuration (folder structure) and application of business hours.We would like to be capable of reporting network performance with a report strictly focused on the times outside business hours, which CA PM does not currently support. We have discontinued the use of the Business Hours Filtering until CA engineers are able to resolve or offer guidance.CA PM can be complex to build and configure. Creating the folders / groups / sites required establishing many rule sets.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Pricing is very high.The solutions are not the cheapest but are robust and stable. License model is rather complex and BMC do often change the model.Use conservative figures. In terms of hardware, monitored servers and also effort. The product is not cheap. But as with other products, you get what you pay for.

Read more »

They should provide more scalable licensing for the product.Do your homework and know how many devices you will be managing out of the gate. Be sure to project what your growth will be each year.We were looking at other vendors in the marketplace for NetFlow, and CA just beat everybody else in price, cost, and the size to implement. ​

Read more »

Bmc truesight operations management vs. ca performance management report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs CA Performance Management and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring.
270,647 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
9,777
Comparisons
4,748
Reviews
8
Followers
936
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
2,708
Comparisons
895
Reviews
18
Followers
616
Avg. Rating
8.2
Top Comparisons
Top ComparisonsSee more BMC TrueSight Operations Management competitors »
Sevone
Compared 6% of the time.
See more CA Performance Management competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsProactiveNet, TrueSight Operations Management
Website/Video
Website/VideoBMC
  • Vendor 6954 screenshot 1524937453
CA Technologies
  • Vendor 6987 screenshot 1524992460
OverviewQuestionmark icon
Overview

The BMCProactiveNet Performance Management Suite is made up of a number of essential components that will allow end-users to proactively manage their physical,virtual and cloud environments.

By combining capacity and performance analytics, ProactiveNet aligns IT enterprise and cloud systems to business demands, ultimately creating more intelligent and proactive business processes. ProactiveNet allows business needs and demands to be the driver of the IT system, and not the other way round, with the result being optimized resources, reduced risks and costs, and higher performance levels within the business.

CA Performance Management is a comprehensive and highly scalable network performance monitoring and analytics platform. It was built to meet the unique demands of big data and modern networks architectures, including highly dynamic and complex hybrid cloud and software-defined networks (SDN).

The platform is design to reduce complexity inherent in modern networks built across numerous technology stacks through advanced network performance monitoring and relationship mapping for improved operational assurance.

Combined with CA Virtual Network Assurance, the platform extends operator visibility through advanced discovery and network performance monitoring of highly sensitive cloud and multi-layered SDN networks and service chains.

OFFER
Learn more about BMC TrueSight Operations Management
Learn more about CA Performance Management
Sample Customers
Sample Customers Bank of East Asia and China E-Port. Jack Henry & Assoc, Target, CenturyLink, Bell Canada, BrightHouse Networks, Telus, Unisys, Verizon, Southern California Edison, GEICO, Fidelity Investments, Wells Fargo, American Family Insurance Group, Deutsche Telekom AG 
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
32%
Insurance Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
REVIEWERS
Insurance Company
27%
Financial Services Firm
20%
Comms Service Provider
20%
Retailer
13%
Company SizeQuestionmark icon
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
64%
Midsize Enterprise
9%
Large Enterprise
27%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
20%
Midsize Enterprise
3%
Large Enterprise
77%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
6%
Large Enterprise
94%
Bmc truesight operations management vs. ca performance management report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs CA Performance Management and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring.
Download now
270,647 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email