We performed a comparison between BMC TrueSight Operations Management and Datadog based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: BMC TrueSight offers quite extensive capabilities such as in-depth analysis, simulated monitoring, proactive oversight, and event administration. Datadog presents valuable features such as customizable displays and reporting, error identification and log consolidation, and ease of use for development teams. BMC TrueSight Operations Management users have concerns regarding deep-dive details, tracing, data agents, reporting, filtration, application monitoring, user interface, setup process, pricing, application visibility tools, dashboards, performance graphs, and stability. Datadog users have highlighted the need for enhancements in usability, integration, learning curve, monitoring, setup, security, customization, AI/ML, documentation, navigability, CSPM, implementation, business analysis, log reporting, dashboard loading, and querying, among other items.
Service and Support: Some customers appreciate the BMC TrueSight Operations Management support team's availability and problem-solving skills, while others have encountered longer response times and a lack of product knowledge. The customer service for Datadog is generally regarded as helpful, responsive, and available around the clock.
Ease of Deployment: The setup process for BMC TrueSight Operations Management can be straightforward or complicated depending on the environment. Datadog's initial setup is generally seen as easy and simple, with some users getting help along the way as needed.
Pricing: BMC TrueSight Operations Management has a high setup cost and limited flexibility. Datadog's pricing and licensing are inconsistent. Some users find it expensive and perplexing, while others consider it reasonable when compared to alternative solutions.
ROI: While ROI relating to BMC TrueSight Operations Management is unclear, users of Datadog mention several advantages, including time savings, reduced blindspots, and fast debugging, which contribute to their satisfaction with the ROI.
Comparison Results: Based on user feedback, Datadog is the preferred choice over BMC TrueSight Operations Management. Users have found Datadog's initial setup process to be easier, more straightforward, painless, and efficient. It can be completed quickly. Datadog offers valuable features like error reporting and log centralization, making it user-friendly for development teams. It also provides a wide range of integrations.
"The most valuable feature of BMC TrueSight Operations Management is the dashboard presentation server."
"The noise reduction for ticketing works much better than we have seen in a lot of other companies."
"Valuable features include wide support for monitoring, strong event management, service management capability, baselining (analytics) and easy to integrate other tools with it."
"It provides common administration, and a Single Sign-On Platform with RBAC, which eases the cross launch between multiple tools"
"BMC TrueSight Operations Management is easily scalable."
"It has provided us with a single location to host all events to be viewed/monitored by our NOC. This has greatly helped them to streamline their processes."
"The tool is flexible enough to be customized based on customer requirements."
"The ability of this platform to monitor the very diverse assets that we maintain around the world is its most valuable feature... We support a vast array of manufacturers' equipment, like HP, IBM, Cisco, Dell, EMC, Hitachi... We can do it all with [this] one [solution]."
"It has provided visibility with ease of implementation and allowed multiple teams to quickly onboard it."
"Datadog is providing efficiency in the products we develop for the wireless device engineering department."
"By moving to Datadog, we did not need to manage our own monitoring infrastructure anymore."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the APM."
"The initial setup is very straightforward."
"Datadog has helped us a ton by allowing us to set up a multitude of easily configurable alarms across our tech stack and infrastructure."
"It has scaled great. I haven't run into any problems anywhere that I've used it. They have handled everything that we have needed them to."
"The Datadog suite has allowed us to easily integrate log collection into all of our services and quickly detect unexpected changes in system data to declare security incidents."
"The UI for the end users could be improved and more flexible than it is now."
"Specifically around application performance monitoring, BMC is definitely not the market leader. The Dynatraces, the New Relics and the like are more of the market leaders in that space. I would like to see them grow that space a little bit more aggressively. It has not really been their bread and butter."
"In our company, we faced some issues with the solution’s application endpoint, IP, and the physical location of the transactions."
"The solution is overly complex."
"The knowledge modules could be more lightweight in size. At present, the installation packages can be quite large."
"I think the ease of deployment needs to be looked at. It would be great if the deployment was faster and easier."
"The solution should improve predicting events and flaws in service. It also needs to improve integration with other systems."
"In a large company of our size, we need multiple people in our company trained. So, I have to take the training classes. Then, I have to go and train the rest of my organization. I would prefer to say to the other people on my team, "Go to this link and..." Or, "Here's a list of training sessions that you can go to which are online and that are free." I think it would help the adoption of their product in the marketplace, personally."
"This service could be less costly."
"I'm not sure if Datadog can monitor K8s deployments in real-time. For instance, being able to see a deployment step by step visually. This would be helpful if there were any incidents during the deployment."
"ECS could be improved by including more tutorials for beginners to reduce the barriers to entry."
"We would like to see some versioning system for the Synthetic Tests so that we could have a backup of our tests since they are time-consuming to make and very easy to damage in a moment of error."
"I'm still exploring the trial version, and it is fine. One thing that I haven't been able to figure out is how to retrieve a report. This is something that could be improved. I probably need to navigate to a place to access the reports."
"I've found that the documentation is lacking in certain regards."
"The ease of implementation needs improvement."
"The more tools that they can build that allow you to run AWX playbooks, or other similar fixes, would benefit clients greatly."
More BMC TrueSight Operations Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
BMC TrueSight Operations Management is ranked 16th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 48 reviews while Datadog is ranked 1st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 137 reviews. BMC TrueSight Operations Management is rated 8.2, while Datadog is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of BMC TrueSight Operations Management writes "The product is reasonably priced, but the solution is a little obsolete because it is deployed on-premise". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". BMC TrueSight Operations Management is most compared with BMC Helix Monitor, Dynatrace, ServiceNow IT Operations Management, Zabbix and IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus, whereas Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and AppDynamics. See our BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs. Datadog report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors, best AIOps vendors, and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
