We performed a comparison between OpenText Documentum and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management."It is a very secure system. It is reliable, and that is one of the reasons people manage their content within Documentum. It gives them the confidence that the content is accessible to the right people and not to the wrong people."
"The storage of metadata content, workflows, and life cycles are the most valuable features of OpenText Documentum."
"Documentum is a highly scalable document management solution because it's built on a solid platform."
"It provides possibilities for us to save documents and supporting the business process while doing so."
"The stability is very good."
"It is quite good."
"We like Documentum for its capacity and reliability."
"The most valuable feature is that the documents are kept secure."
"The product is very stable."
"They are the building blocks of EAI in SAG products, and they offer a very good platform."
"The stability is good."
"We needed a tool that was able to orchestrate and help us configure our APIs so that we could maintain and see the heartbeat, traffic, trends, etc."
"Best feature is Insight for monitoring, and as a debugging tool. It has saved us a lot of time during crisis situations."
"What I like best about webMethods Integration Server is its portfolio of connectors."
"webMethods Integration Server is an easy-to-use solution and does not require a lot of coding."
"A product with good API and EDI components."
"It needs a better UI and it should also be cloud-ready. The UI has not changed in years."
"OpenText Documentum is moving to the cloud, and I am concerned about the security aspect of it."
"The documentation often leaves customers feeling somewhat frustrated, as OpenText seems to expect customers to remind them constantly about the need for better documentation, as they don't provide clear guidance on their documentation practices."
"The product needs to improve the way documents are logged together. I believe running it on the cloud or containerization will bring value to it. The tool's Time to Market and deployment cycle need to be improved. Finding suitable training materials for OpenText Documentum is also a bottleneck. If we can find the training modules easily, we can bring together people, give them quick training, and start working on the deployment. It can help with quick outputs."
"The biggest issue for us is the price of the product."
"The user interface can be a bit more intuitive."
"OpenText Documentum has a lot of scope for improvement in terms of adding some AI integrations."
"OpenText Documentum needs to improve its support."
"This product has too many gaps. You find them after update installations. This should be covered by automatic testing."
"This product is for larger companies. Compared to TIBCO I think webMethods is better in terms of ease of use and support."
"In terms of improvement, it would be better if it adapted quicker to open standards. It took a while for API specification before the last version was available. The spec of version two was rather quick."
"The solution has big instances when deployed under microservices or in a containerized platform. They need to improve that so that it is competitive with other integration solutions, like Redis and Kafka. Deployments under microservices with those solutions are much more lightweight, in the size of the runtime itself, compared with Software AG."
"webMethods Integration Server needs to add more adapters."
"When migration happens from the one release to an upgraded release from Software AG, many of the existing services are deprecated and developers have to put in effort testing and redeveloping some of the services. It would be better that upgrade releases took care to support the lower-level versions of webMethods."
"We got the product via a reseller, and the support from the reseller has been less than desirable."
"The initial setup of the webMethods Integration Server is not easy but it gets easier once you know it. It is tiresome but not difficult."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
OpenText Documentum is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 26 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. OpenText Documentum is rated 7.8, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of OpenText Documentum writes "Saves time and increases an organization's productivity". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". OpenText Documentum is most compared with OpenText Extended ECM, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and Alfresco, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi AtomSphere Integration.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
