We performed a comparison between M-Files and OpenText Documentum based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Box, DocuWare, Hyland and others in Document Management Software."Using M-Files means anybody on the executive team to go in and immediately look at a dashboard and know the status of a contract."
"I appreciate Documentum's scalability, allowing for vast volumes of content storage."
"The tool's most valuable feature is ACL, which helps to control the user groups that access the documents."
"The most valuable feature of Documentum for our content management needs is its ability to segregate access based on department and role."
"OpenText Documentum has improved availability and performance in our organization."
"It is a very secure system. It is reliable, and that is one of the reasons people manage their content within Documentum. It gives them the confidence that the content is accessible to the right people and not to the wrong people."
"The most valuable feature of OpenText Documentum is the versioning."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the security, storage, and document search capability."
"The product is tamper-proof and enables us to return to the document source, which is helpful in legal issues."
"The integration with other products needs to be improved."
"It's difficult to manage and customize Documentum."
"Documentum is a very robust system. Everything can be improved, but at this time, I do not have anything in particular. If anything, they can put our software in their standard."
"The user interface can be improved."
"The product needs to improve the way documents are logged together. I believe running it on the cloud or containerization will bring value to it. The tool's Time to Market and deployment cycle need to be improved. Finding suitable training materials for OpenText Documentum is also a bottleneck. If we can find the training modules easily, we can bring together people, give them quick training, and start working on the deployment. It can help with quick outputs."
"Sometimes DocBroker cannot see the DocBase."
"I would like to see performance improvements, especially regarding slow response times."
"An area that needs to improve is how to reduce storage space on the AWS site."
"One area for improvement in OpenText Documentum is its handling of outdated documents, especially technical ones."
Earn 20 points
M-Files is ranked 8th in Document Management Software while OpenText Documentum is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 26 reviews. M-Files is rated 9.0, while OpenText Documentum is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of M-Files writes "Good workflows, and it is easy to use with a dashboard that improves contract visibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Documentum writes "Saves time and increases an organization's productivity". M-Files is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Extended ECM, IBM FileNet, Microsoft Purview Records Management and Alfresco, whereas OpenText Documentum is most compared with OpenText Extended ECM, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and OpenText eDOCS.
We monitor all Document Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
