We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Hyland OnBase vs. IBM Datacap

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Camunda Platform Logo
38,519 views|25,491 comparisons
Hyland OnBase Logo
3,355 views|2,546 comparisons
IBM Datacap Logo
3,012 views|1,317 comparisons
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Signavio, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: October 2021.
540,694 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand.""It allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products.""It has an open BPM""The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface.""Being able to use a Java-based solution makes the product flexible.""The best feature is the automation.""The most valuable feature is the scheduling.""Ease of use and ability to streamline a process model."

More Camunda Platform Pros »

"OnBase is a remarkable tool. It is a well-done product. Hyland has a lot of experience in building it and looking for new things for clients in terms of functionalities. It has amazing stability, and it can grow horizontally and vertically. It is built for growth. Their technical support is also quite good and available throughout the year.""I like the cloud and its integrability."

More Hyland OnBase Pros »

"The second thing that I like about Datacap is the fingerprint capture which is easy to configure on Datacap. From the form of the document, if a document is redundant in the same department, we can configure the capture based on the form of the documents""The solution automates manual data entry."

More IBM Datacap Pros »

Cons
"Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance.""If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map.""Lacking in forms visualization.""The support definitely can be improved. Apart from that, the language should be extendable to other platforms. If I want to write, I'll run a different platform, like Python code on top of it, or COBOL code on top of it, and it should support those languages.""The solution could use some enhancements like adding connectors, improving forms and having a mobile app, but everything is an enhancement rather than a flaw.""The only drawback is the time that it takes to have a complete set of workflows implemented on the Camunda platform.""The initial set up could be simplified, it's complex.""Process interfaces between diagrams could be improved."

More Camunda Platform Cons »

"For user experience, they would have to do more with the interface. It is not easy to work with and is a little messy. It is getting better, but it is not yet good enough. Other products are comparatively doing better in terms of the user interface. I have been hearing about Box, which is very easy to use and learn for the users. OnBase has to work on this aspect. It should have BPM capabilities. We compete with tools that provide the BPM feature and support those standards. They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions.""The look and feel could be better. The integration with the user could be better. It could also be more user-friendly."

More Hyland OnBase Cons »

"The interface can be more intuitive.""I would like better ease of use and more support options."

More IBM Datacap Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"I use the open-source free version.""The open-source version of the product is free to use.""The cost of this solution is better than some competing products.""Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year.""We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost.""I think Camunda BPM can improve their licensing costs. It isn't easy to find clients with Camunda BPM licenses mainly because it's quite expensive.""When compared with the proprietary products, the pricing costs are much less, even though it is an enterprise edition.""There is an open-source version available, that in its core features (workflow and decision engine, modeler) is exactly the same as in the enterprise version."

More Camunda Platform Pricing and Cost Advice »

"They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

More Hyland OnBase Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
540,694 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: In a broad perspective when you compare Camunda & Bonita they have the below features: Camunda features: BPM… more »
Top Answer: The Camunda BPMN Platform is very flexible and gives several options to deploy and scale it.
Top Answer: There is an open-source version available, that in its core features (workflow and decision engine, modeler) is exactly… more »
Top Answer: I like the cloud and its integrability.
Top Answer: They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have… more »
Top Answer: The look and feel could be better!!!
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons
Also Known As
Camunda BPM
OnBase
Datacap
Learn More
Overview

Camunda Platform is a complete process automation tech stack with powerful execution engines for BPMN workflows and DMN decisions paired with essential applications for modeling, operations, and analytics.

With a clear vision to automate any process, anywhere, Camunda is reinventing process automation for the digital enterprise. Featuring a developer-friendly, open source approach, enterprises can use Camunda Platform to breakthrough technological, organizational, and infrastructure barriers, optimize their business processes, and drive their digital transformation initiatives forward.

OnBase enterprise content management software combines integrated document management, business process management and records management in a single application. Whether deployed as a hosted or premises-based solution, OnBase allows organizations to automate business processes and reduce the time and cost of performing important business functions through the management and control of content.

IBM Datacap helps you streamline the capture, recognition and classification of business documents and extract important information. Datacap supports multiple-channel capture by processing paper documents on scanners, mobile devices, multi-function peripherals and fax. It uses natural language processing, text analytics and machine learning technologies, like those in IBM Watson, to automatically identify, classify and extract content from unstructured or variable documents. The software can reduce labor and paper costs, deliver meaningful information and support faster decision making.

Offer
Learn more about Camunda Platform
Learn more about Hyland OnBase
Learn more about IBM Datacap
Sample Customers
24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, Allianz Indonesia, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando
Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital
Turkcell, PowerSouth Energy Cooperative, Central Nacional Unimed, Conqord Oil
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm24%
Computer Software Company24%
Comms Service Provider18%
Non Profit12%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm11%
Government7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider9%
Financial Services Firm8%
Government8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider12%
Financial Services Firm11%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business54%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise26%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise57%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business63%
Large Enterprise38%
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Signavio, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: October 2021.
540,694 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Hyland OnBase is ranked 35th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews while IBM Datacap is ranked 3rd in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) with 2 reviews. Hyland OnBase is rated 0.0, while IBM Datacap is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Hyland OnBase writes "A remarkable all-in-one platform with amazing stability and scalability and good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Datacap writes "Enables us to extract data from the documents to make the research of the documents easier for our clients". Hyland OnBase is most compared with OpenText Content Suite Platform, SharePoint, Alfresco, IBM FileNet and Hyland Perceptive Content, whereas IBM Datacap is most compared with ABBYY FlexiCapture, Kofax TotalAgility, Kofax RPA, IQ Bot and CA View.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.