Hyland OnBase vs. SharePoint Comparison

Hyland OnBase

SharePoint

Hyland OnBase

Read 1 Hyland OnBase review.

4,141 views|3,066 comparisons

SharePoint

Read 16 SharePoint reviews.

33,923 views|28,498 comparisons

Most Helpful Review

Use Hyland OnBase? Share your opinion.

Mordhi Alenazi

Business Application Development Manager at NWC

Good collaboration and sharing but the workflow engine cannot support business needs

It has improved my organization in the following ways: * Gave us the ability to integrate with other systems that need a lot of customization. *... Read more »

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: January 2021.

Download now

455,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"OnBase is a remarkable tool. It is a well-done product. Hyland has a lot of experience in building it and looking for new things for clients in terms of functionalities. It has amazing stability, and it can grow horizontally and vertically. It is built for growth. Their technical support is also quite good and available throughout the year." More Hyland OnBase Pros »	"The workflow feature is valuable because it enables us to cascade responsibilities.""For any organization with more than one person in it, if they are trying to organize things to let people in the company know what others are doing, then this solution is good for them.""This solution has helped us with the categorization, organization, management, discovery, and delivery of program and project related information.""The most valuable features are the Integrations, web site, and search.""The online editing capabilities, file sharing, auditing, information security, ease of solution management, and the easy user adaptation to the platform are the most valuable features.""The most valuable features are the collaboration and sharing." More SharePoint Pros »
Cons
"For user experience, they would have to do more with the interface. It is not easy to work with and is a little messy. It is getting better, but it is not yet good enough. Other products are comparatively doing better in terms of the user interface. I have been hearing about Box, which is very easy to use and learn for the users. OnBase has to work on this aspect. It should have BPM capabilities. We compete with tools that provide the BPM feature and support those standards. They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions." More Hyland OnBase Cons »	"Workflow is something that can become more intelligent.""I would like a simpler, more cost-effective solution for connecting data sources with workflows and BI tools, or data mining tools.""This solution would benefit from the implementation of enhanced online forms and template development capabilities.""The areas of this solution that need improvement are the relationships between lists, cross-site web parts, and page-building tools.""The way to change the version of the files in SharePoint should be improved. The method of synchronizing files from local to cloud can also use improvement.""The workflow engine cannot support the business needs." More SharePoint Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions." More Hyland OnBase Pricing and Cost Advice »	"The pricing works for us.""For this type of solution, it is not wise to buy it without Software Assurance." More SharePoint Pricing and Cost Advice »

See Which Vendors Are Best For You Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs. See Recommendations 455,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
12th out of 39 in Enterprise Content Management Views 4,141 Comparisons 3,066 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A	1st out of 39 in Enterprise Content Management Views 33,923 Comparisons 28,498 Reviews 17 Average Words per Review 360 Rating 7.8
Popular Comparisons
OpenText Content Suite Platform vs. Hyland OnBase Compared 16% of the time. IBM FileNet vs. Hyland OnBase Compared 12% of the time. Hyland Perceptive Content vs. Hyland OnBase Compared 12% of the time. Alfresco vs. Hyland OnBase Compared 9% of the time. OpenText Documentum vs. Hyland OnBase Compared 6% of the time. See more Hyland OnBase competitors » + Add more products to compare	WordPress vs. SharePoint Compared 11% of the time. Citrix ShareFile vs. SharePoint Compared 8% of the time. Box vs. SharePoint Compared 8% of the time. OpenText Content Suite Platform vs. SharePoint Compared 7% of the time. OpenText Documentum vs. SharePoint Compared 6% of the time. See more SharePoint competitors » + Add more products to compare
Also Known As
OnBase	SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010
Learn
Hyland	Microsoft
Overview
OnBase enterprise content management software combines integrated document management, business process management and records management in a single application. Whether deployed as a hosted or premises-based solution, OnBase allows organizations to automate business processes and reduce the time and cost of performing important business functions through the management and control of content.	SharePoint is a Microsoft-based platform for building web applications. It covers a widerange of capabilities and while it is appropriate for experienced webdevelopers, even non-technical minded users can easily navigate through thesystem and execute functions such as collaborating data, managing documents andfiles, creating websites, managing social networking solutions, and automatingworkflow. Major areas that SharePoint deals with are websites,communities, content, search, insights, and composites. The purpose is to give usersthe ability to create or develop these key business components on their owneven without technical knowledge of, for example, how to build a website or howto integrate coding. Configuring SharePoint into a business's system is meantto cut out all of the complicated steps, and pave the way for easierimplementation all around.
Offer
Learn more about Hyland OnBase Learn More	Learn more about SharePoint Learn More
Sample Customers
Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital	Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS Computer Software Company31% Comms Service Provider8% Government7% Financial Services Firm5%	REVIEWERS Financial Services Firm14% Energy/Utilities Company10% University10% Comms Service Provider8% VISITORS READING REVIEWS Computer Software Company25% Comms Service Provider14% Government11% Manufacturing Company5%
Company Size
No Data Available	REVIEWERS Small Business38% Midsize Enterprise21% Large Enterprise41% VISITORS READING REVIEWS Small Business4% Midsize Enterprise25% Large Enterprise71%

Hyland OnBase is ranked 12th in Enterprise Content Management with 1 review while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 16 reviews. Hyland OnBase is rated 0.0, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Hyland OnBase writes "A remarkable all-in-one platform with amazing stability and scalability and good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Plan, plan, plan. Over-budget". Hyland OnBase is most compared with OpenText Content Suite Platform, IBM FileNet, Hyland Perceptive Content, Alfresco and OpenText Documentum, whereas SharePoint is most compared with WordPress, Citrix ShareFile, Box, OpenText Content Suite Platform and OpenText Documentum.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Compare Hyland OnBase vs. SharePoint