Most Helpful Review | |||
Use Hyland OnBase? Share your opinion. |
| ||
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: January 2021. 455,108 professionals have used our research since 2012. |
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs. 455,108 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking | |
Views 4,141 Comparisons 3,066 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 33,923 Comparisons 28,498 Reviews 17 Average Words per Review 360 Rating 7.8 |
Popular Comparisons | |
![]() Compared 16% of the time. ![]() Compared 12% of the time. ![]() Compared 12% of the time. ![]() Compared 9% of the time. ![]() Compared 6% of the time. | ![]() Compared 11% of the time. ![]() Compared 8% of the time. ![]() Compared 8% of the time. ![]() Compared 7% of the time. ![]() Compared 6% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
OnBase | SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010 |
Learn | |
Hyland | Microsoft |
Overview | |
OnBase enterprise content management software combines integrated document management, business process management and records management in a single application. Whether deployed as a hosted or premises-based solution, OnBase allows organizations to automate business processes and reduce the time and cost of performing important business functions through the management and control of content. | SharePoint is a Microsoft-based platform for building web applications. It covers a widerange of capabilities and while it is appropriate for experienced webdevelopers, even non-technical minded users can easily navigate through thesystem and execute functions such as collaborating data, managing documents andfiles, creating websites, managing social networking solutions, and automatingworkflow. Major areas that SharePoint deals with are websites,communities, content, search, insights, and composites. The purpose is to give usersthe ability to create or develop these key business components on their owneven without technical knowledge of, for example, how to build a website or howto integrate coding. Configuring SharePoint into a business's system is meantto cut out all of the complicated steps, and pave the way for easierimplementation all around. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Hyland OnBase | Learn more about SharePoint |
Sample Customers | |
Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital | Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara. |
Top Industries | |
Computer Software Company31% Comms Service Provider8% Government7% Financial Services Firm5% | Financial Services Firm14% Energy/Utilities Company10% University10% Comms Service Provider8% Computer Software Company25% Comms Service Provider14% Government11% Manufacturing Company5% |
Company Size | |
No Data Available | Small Business38% Midsize Enterprise21% Large Enterprise41% Small Business4% Midsize Enterprise25% Large Enterprise71% |
Hyland OnBase is ranked 12th in Enterprise Content Management with 1 review while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 16 reviews. Hyland OnBase is rated 0.0, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Hyland OnBase writes "A remarkable all-in-one platform with amazing stability and scalability and good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Plan, plan, plan. Over-budget". Hyland OnBase is most compared with OpenText Content Suite Platform, IBM FileNet, Hyland Perceptive Content, Alfresco and OpenText Documentum, whereas SharePoint is most compared with WordPress, Citrix ShareFile, Box, OpenText Content Suite Platform and OpenText Documentum.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.