Compare IBM BPM vs. IBM Case Foundation

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM BPM Logo
16,117 views|11,568 comparisons
IBM Case Foundation Logo
878 views|651 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM BPM vs. IBM Case Foundation and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
447,718 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"It excels at analytics. It provides visibility across all activities of a company's processes and performance.""It helps improve your process through continual measurement.""This solution is very stable.""This solution has streamlined our operation and improved the TAT of sales, operations, and underwriters.""Good user interface and good add option.""The solution offers great notifications.""I like the APIs and the BPM coach is a good tool. But if I had to pick one, it would be the API.""This tool is very useful when it comes to enterprise-grade automation and governmental processes for the security aspects, performance, and reliability."

More IBM BPM Pros »

"The solution is scalable.""The client and the IBM content navigation are the solution's most valuable features.""Flexible and the ability to divide search screens, and to search for documents. The ECM feature inside the system is great.""The most valuable features are those involving decision making, analysis, and anything related to event documents because those processes are related to content as well.""It is easy to set up workflows that notify the user depending on certain events.""The most valuable feature is its stability, which is why we are using it.""The content management is great."

More IBM Case Foundation Pros »

Cons
"We care about technology and support because support is very important and a BPM is not easy to implement.""Could increase vulnerability and security patches to make it more robust.""Finding errors and bugs on the system is not easy. We can't seem to use the events or logs to find them, so it makes it difficult to debug the system. They really need to work on their debugging features to make is much, much easier. It would improve the solution considerably and should be something they add in a future release.""The debugging needs improvement. There is some confusion surrounding the debugging.""Importing and exporting between multiple environments is more difficult with other tools.""IBM BPM lacks openness, that is, the ability to become open for new options in terms of APIs, front-end development, and ecosystem. IBM BPM has been quite closed. One of the main improvements would be to somehow embed the rules engine into IBM BPM. Merging IBM BRMS and the rules engine with IBM BPM would be helpful. If there was some simpler way to define rules without having to put IBM BRMS on top of it, it would be good. It's something that we can get out of Camunda but not out of IBM BPM.""Our developers are complaining that it's too complex to maintain.""Patching is required every three months and a major upgrade every two years, which should be optional."

More IBM BPM Cons »

"The service as it currently stands is out-of-date and lacks flexibility.""Comparing the solution with other interfaces, IBM BPM is much better than Case Foundation. They need to make this solution's interface more user-friendly.""There are some features that could be enhanced like the document viewer""The interface needs to be more user-friendly.""Once a workflow is launched then it stays static forever, which is a problem because if there is a change in the business then you cannot change the workflow.""We are now using microservices but there are some areas where the coordination with FileNet is problematic.""90% of the feedback we receive states that the UI is not very user-friendly."

More IBM Case Foundation Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The cloud and license of the subscription model for IBM BPM can be complex. There are a lot of alternatives to choose from.""It should provide more flexibility to connect with external systems, and there should be in-built services that can be used to integrate with other systems quickly.""The price is quite inflated, and I think that our service contract is per year with monthly fees."

More IBM BPM Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Pricing is in the mid-range, it is not cheap, but it's not expensive.""This is not an expensive solution and we are using the standard license.""IBM Case Foundation is a little expensive."

More IBM Case Foundation Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management solutions are best for your needs.
447,718 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The most valuable features are those involving decision making, analysis, and anything related to event documents because those processes are related to content as well.
Top Answer: Pricing is in the mid-range, it is not cheap, but it's not expensive. Two models are available and it depends on which one you are using.
Top Answer: The interface needs to be more user-friendly. In the next release, I would like to see better integration with ERP tools and an improved interface.
Ranking
Views
16,117
Comparisons
11,568
Reviews
13
Average Words per Review
450
Avg. Rating
7.5
Views
878
Comparisons
651
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
383
Avg. Rating
7.7
Popular Comparisons
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Also Known As
WebSphere Lombardi Edition, IBM Business Process Manager, IBM WebSphere Process ServerCase Foundation, FileNet Business Process Manager
Learn
IBM
IBM
Overview
IBM Business Process Manager is a comprehensive BPM platform giving you visibility and insight to manage business processes. It scales smoothly and easily from an initial project to a full enterprise-wide program harnesses complexity in a simple environment to better meet customer needs.IBM Case Foundation is for organizations that need to harness unstructured information and integrate it with business processes to drive critical business decisions. It enables organizations to create, manage and optimize case-based processes and is designed to decrease development costs while significantly improving process performance. Case Foundation links specific pieces of content with a structured workflow. It's an on ramp for organizations that choose to move from document-centric workflow solutions to the advanced capabilities of IBM Case Manager.
Offer
Learn more about IBM BPM
Learn more about IBM Case Foundation
Sample Customers
Barclays, EmeriCon, Banca Popolare di Milano, CST Consulting, KeyBank, KPMG, Prolifics, Sandhata Technologies Ltd., State of Alaska, Humana S.A., Saperion, esciris, Banco Espirito SantoSuncorp Group Limited
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm66%
Insurance Company21%
Non Tech Company3%
Healthcare Company3%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm10%
Insurance Company7%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise71%
REVIEWERS
Small Business25%
Midsize Enterprise38%
Large Enterprise38%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM BPM vs. IBM Case Foundation and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
447,718 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Business Process Management with 14 reviews while IBM Case Foundation is ranked 13th in Business Process Management with 7 reviews. IBM BPM is rated 7.6, while IBM Case Foundation is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers lots of space, quite stable, and perfect for large enterprises". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Case Foundation writes "Harness and integrate unstructured information with business processes". IBM BPM is most compared with IBM Business Automation Workflow, Camunda BPM, Pega BPM, Apache Airflow and Bizagi, whereas IBM Case Foundation is most compared with IBM Business Automation Workflow, Pega BPM, Camunda BPM and OpenText 360 for SharePoint. See our IBM BPM vs. IBM Case Foundation report.

See our list of best Business Process Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.