We performed a comparison between IBM ECM and Microsoft OneDrive based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management."The vertical scalability, as we can use it across some of our applications."
"The scalability is a valuable feature, that we're able to display our documents to so many people."
"The content management is all about you as you can make the same content for minimal purpose solutions applications."
"The tool is a very stable solution with high availability and no information leakage. It has built-in API integration on-site. You can integrate with other components and applications like SAP, Microsoft, Oracle, etc."
"The backup capability is one feature I love about OneDrive. I also like how it syncs when you're working offline. Everything is updated once you connect again."
"It's quite easy to use and then of course it is quite well integrated to the rest of Office 365."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the amount of space allotted to each user that is issued a subscription."
"It is good as a central hub for the storage of documents and sharing among team members."
"Scalability is good just because it is a cloud-based product."
"It helps you keep organized."
"It is free if you use Microsoft Office 365."
"With this solution, the sharing of documents if very easy to do. There's a lot of collaboration you can do with your colleagues."
"I think it's already getting away from Java applets. A lot of our users struggle with keeping up to date with Java versioning, so a lot of the functions they're doing, like printing, emailing, and even some of the viewing, they're struggling with."
"The development platform is not local. For example, you need 100 days in IBM, whereas other platforms, like ServiceNow, need only 20 days."
"I would like to see seamless application integration."
"I would recommend not going with ECM 8 and going with FileNet instead. It seems like that is the future of the lower-volume repository. It seems like they are moving away from ECM 8.5 so I think we're going to have some challenges coming up, getting off of that technology."
"The solution has sub-folders, which are visible to various team members. If you want to ensure the information is private, you would need to have a certain level of seniority in the office."
"An online video player would be great, since sometimes you have to download the video to play it."
"The user interface sometimes fails and when it cannot connect, it does not give the reason why."
"The website could be improved. Sometimes I try to login and the website has issues, I can't retrieve my documents."
"An increase in the capacity of storage in the free version would be nice."
"No one gets an alert when files are deleted."
"The scalability has room for improvement."
"Technical support is not very impressive and is typical of large company software support."
IBM ECM is ranked 13th in Enterprise Content Management with 16 reviews while Microsoft OneDrive is ranked 4th in Content Collaboration Platforms with 19 reviews. IBM ECM is rated 8.0, while Microsoft OneDrive is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IBM ECM writes "Datacap provides granularity and any level of customization. Solution development and delivery time needs to be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft OneDrive writes "A transparent and self-explanatory storage system for data and files". IBM ECM is most compared with IBM FileNet, Mobius Content Services Platform, OpenText Documentum, SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management and Alfresco, whereas Microsoft OneDrive is most compared with SharePoint, Dropbox, Box, Atlassian Confluence and Citrix ShareFile.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.