We performed a comparison between ManageEngine IT360 and ServiceNow based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Asset Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The technical support is good."
"It is easy to identify and collect information from all of the nodes on the network."
"The product helps users stay on top of gaining insight into the active directory, permissions and security sets, and user group policy changes."
"The most valuable features of the solution are the ease of use and the sensor for ticketing systems."
"ServiceNow has been implemented to streamline team workflows across different departments in our company. Users, including traveling leaders, were able to approve requests and authorize additional rights through the mobile platform."
"Being able to have the required information for project management is valuable. I've got multiple people accessing it, and I'm tracking tasks with percentages done. It allows me to have detailed notes and provides the ability to attach documents. I have used a lot of project management solutions, and there were gaps in terms of what was available. ServiceNow has got all the features and functionalities. It is a solid solution. It is also easy to get into and use. It is certainly highly scalable."
"It has more extensive features as compared to the other competitors."
"There are many expansions available."
"ServiceNow is one of the few easiest platforms you can integrate with products like Ansible to automate your workflows."
"A workflow automation platform that's reliable, performs well, and has good reporting and integration."
"I have found many features that are important and that are easier when compared to Remedy; for example, the Scripted REST APIs and the Flow Designer... The Client scripts are simpler when you compare with Remedy."
"The ManageEngine features could improve to show graphs of the traffic and network utility."
"We would like to have support for integration with ServiceDesk."
"The product could use more intelligence, automation and general availability of product information."
"The solution’s pricing is expensive and could be improved."
"The RPA needs improvement. That's a new area for them that they're just entering into now."
"Where it could be improved is Discovery. This may sound odd since I just praised the value of ServiceNow Discovery, but improvements to its automatic detection, the breadth of devices, and the depth of devices covered, as well as keeping up with new technologies, are all essential."
"The scalability needs improvement."
"Their cloud management is also not that great compared to other products."
"HR Service Management is one module that needs a lot of improvement because it's a pretty new module. It was introduced in the last two years. It's becoming more mature day by day, but there is a lot of scope for improvement in that module."
"The utilization of AI in ServiceNow needs enhancement."
"The interface requires an upgrade."
Earn 20 points
ManageEngine IT360 is ranked 29th in IT Asset Management while ServiceNow is ranked 1st in IT Asset Management with 212 reviews. ManageEngine IT360 is rated 8.4, while ServiceNow is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of ManageEngine IT360 writes "Good monitoring and alerting capability, and it is easy to deploy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow writes "A stable and scalable solution that has excellent features and is useful for collecting data and building KPIs". ManageEngine IT360 is most compared with StackPath Monitoring and eG Enterprise, whereas ServiceNow is most compared with BMC Helix ITSM, Microsoft Power Apps, Pega BPM, IBM Maximo and Appian. See our ManageEngine IT360 vs. ServiceNow report.
See our list of best IT Asset Management vendors.
We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
