We performed a comparison between Mule Anypoint Platform and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business-to-Business Middleware solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool's visual features are attractive."
"The solution's deployment and proxy processes are very good."
"The ability to define multi-tiered APIs and reuse them is a fantastic platform feature."
"The most valuable features of the Mule Anypoint Platform are the Flex Gateway, API management, easy-to-use, and connectors. Additionally, they are coming out with improvements to the solution when required."
"Mule Anypoint Platform's valuable features are its flexibility in terms of deployment and its SaaS capabilities."
"The API toolkit is the solution's most valuable aspect at this time, for our organization."
"It can scale."
"When we talk about the APIs, there are multiple policies one can apply on APIs, like rate limiting policies, OWASP policies, and OWASP security policies, that can be easily configured in Mule Anypoint Platform."
"It's a consolidated product. It works and it does its job pretty well."
"The solution's customer service is good."
"It was mostly easy to set up the product."
"Currently, I find the configuration part quite valuable, where you can easily configure things."
"The customer service executives are very responsive."
"It's a very complete product. It allows us to network security and add more layers of security to the system."
"The drag-and-drop features for connectors are very valuable."
"WSO2's analytics capability is good, considering the ELC support they provide."
"Adding connectors for new upcoming applications would add extra value to this product."
"It would be better if we had a clearer view of the solution's future releases."
"Pricing is one aspect of the solution that is troublesome. It's too expensive for smaller organizations."
"The solution's licensing methodologies could be improved."
"The solution's pricing model is very strange, and it will be really expensive if you use APIs a lot."
"The pricing can be a little bit less."
"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having better integration with MDM. There are challenges when doing the interaction at this time."
"One area we'd like to see improvement in is the error logging and troubleshooting process."
"They should release upgrades more frequently."
"If I have to buy software, then it becomes expensive for me."
"The server is very specific and it is very difficult to get experience with it."
"The administration side is complex and could use significant improvements to enhance the solution's functionality."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The setup can be difficult for those not familiar with the solution."
"You cannot include the validation of XPath."
"The customization can be a bit difficult."
Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 2nd in Business-to-Business Middleware with 40 reviews while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is ranked 19th in Data Integration with 18 reviews. Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2, while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator writes "Consolidated, reliable, and has responsive technical support". Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration and SAP Cloud Platform, whereas WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is most compared with Red Hat Fuse, Oracle Service Bus, IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server and Talend Open Studio. See our Mule Anypoint Platform vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator report.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
