Compare Oracle Identity Governance vs. SailPoint IdentityIQ
Sponsored | ||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | ||
"The most valuable feature is the automatic provisioning and reconciliation of things like the Active Directory groups and memberships." "The most valuable aspect of the product is that it is Microsoft-based and it supports all Microsoft technology." "Our customers have benefited from Omada Identity automating the certification process. Most of our customers were using manual methods for user access certification. With Omada Identity, you can automate almost all of it, which means that certification now becomes on demand. You don't have to wait for two or three months to execute a certification timeframe. Instead, you can do certifications as often as you want." | "The most valuable feature is the flexible automation functionality which has optimized our user access privilege management. This has allowed us to create and delete user accounts more accurately and efficiently. This feature has enabled us to save time and resources needed to perform mundane manual tasks." "This solution has improved the organization in several ways, including saving many help-desk password-reset calls, IT staff productivity, and quicker user on-boarding." "It has a very good response time." "The solution is quite stable once you are able to overcome the bugs" "The most valuable feature is the set of out-of-the-box connectors." "Good features are the RBAC and UI customization." "Understanding what a customer is using, what they are looking for, and allowing permissions is a challenge. We use the information we get in order to understand the behavior of the customer beyond the security and to understand what they have been doing in the last month. It's a nice way to understand what is attracting the customer and what they are clicking. That could be implemented by using this kind of application." | "We like the integration with other systems." "The compliance features are the most valuable features." "The community is very active and when I had questions about an issue, I was able to find the resources." "The solution is very good at the management of the identity lifecycle." "The solution is stable and reliable." "Certifications and user provisioning features are the most valuable." |
Cons | ||
"The user interface should have a more flexible design, where you can change it to your requirement." "When the re-certification process is launched that makes Omada very slow. There are performance issues in the current version." "The Omada Identity SaaS version doesn't provide all the features Omada Identity on-premise provides." | "You need full visibility because the suite of features are complex and you have to be clear on what you want to implement." "Simplify & add more functionality to Identity Cloud Service (IDCS)." "It responds fast but because of the bugs we have already had some major incidents and complete unavailability." "The initial setup is quite complex. The user interface is just awful. It's not user-friendly or intuitive at all." "The cost of this product needs to be reduced." "The user interface experience needs to be improved." "Our issues with the solution have to do with the integration with different applications. It's not easy to connect ICAO to this kind of product. It would be better to work on the extensions of the adapters for this kind of identity management solution in order to not put in the code in the product." | "I would like to see more Cloud management from this product." "They should lower the price and technical support should be better." "The interface should be simple and easier to use." "Compared to at least one other product some of the administrative tasks could be easier or more intuitive." "The connectors are far too manual. This needs to be automated a bit." "The UI needs to be more user friendly. More concentration on historical policy violations would be great. In terms of new features, I would like to see artificial intelligence and machine language added." |
Pricing and Cost Advice | ||
"The initial total cost of ownership to implement Omada Identity is not small. The TCO for the implementation is as high as any other solution. However, the cost of maintaining the solution is at par or lower than competitors, including adding more features or maintaining the system after the initial deployment or installation to make sure that they are available for users to use or extending the functionalities of those activities. Those maintenance costs are lower than other vendors, but the initial cost of getting the system installed is still high." | "The cost of support and upgrading to the next release are both expensive." | "The licensing fees are on a yearly basis." "You do pay one price for the license but that price depends on what you choose to include as far as the optional modules go." "SailPoint is higher in price as compared to Saviynt. The initial cost of SailPoint is very high. There are additional costs to the standard licensing fees." |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Provisioning Software solutions are best for your needs. 455,108 professionals have used our research since 2012. | ||
Questions from the Community | ||
Top Answer: The most valuable aspect of the product is that it is Microsoft-based and it supports all Microsoft technology. Top Answer: Licenses are only for installations and support problems. They are definitely additional costs. Top Answer: In terms of improvement, there are not so many out of the box connectors available in the current version. So what they… more » | Ask a question Earn 20 points | Top Answer: The community is very active and when I had questions about an issue, I was able to find the resources. Top Answer: This solution is difficult to configure. The interface should be simple and easier to use. Top Answer: We used this solution in one of our projects for provisioning rights in applications such as Active Directory and Office… more » |
Popular Comparisons | ||
 Compared 25% of the time.  Compared 16% of the time.  Compared 7% of the time.  Compared 6% of the time.  Compared 3% of the time. | Compared 11% of the time.  Compared 11% of the time. Compared 7% of the time. Compared 6% of the time. | Compared 12% of the time. Compared 10% of the time. Compared 8% of the time. Compared 7% of the time. Compared 3% of the time. |
Also Known As | ||
| Omada Identity Suite | Oracle Identity Manager, Oracle IAM, Oracle Identity and Access Management Suite | IdentityIQ |
Learn | ||
| Omada | Oracle | SailPoint |
Overview  | ||
Omada Identity Suite Core identity management and access governance functionality in one integrated solution. High-Level Identity Management and Access Governance Functionality Omada's Identity Suite delivers a fully featured process framework for core identity management and access governance functionalities, that improves IT security, ensures compliance control, and enables business efficiency. | Oracle Identity Governance reduces the total cost of ownership for organizations by empowering user self-service, simplifying audit and compliance tasks and automating IT operations. By delivering a comprehensive platform for access request, role lifecycle management, access certification, closed loop remediation and privileged account management, Oracle Identity Governance is a solution that address today's requirements and enables organizations to quickly adapt to emerging requirements. Oracle Identity Governance suite provides many benefits, including: Increased end user productivity, Increased IT productivity and automation of provisioning tasks, accelerated useronboarding and stringent controls over sensitive access to shared privileged accounts, Reduced total cost and risk and Increased efficiency. | Identity and access management software that includes compliance and password management, analytics, and user provisioning. |
Offer | ||
Learn more about Omada Identity | Learn more about Oracle Identity Governance | Learn more about SailPoint IdentityIQ |
Sample Customers | ||
| ECCO Shoes, Vattenfall, Krka, Bayer, NuStar Energy, DuPont | Werkbank, Oshkosh, PeerPay, Boingo, Kellogg's, Pella, Slanska, Avaya, D+M | Adobe, Aviva, Axa, Tokyo Electron |
Top Industries | ||
Computer Software Company36% Comms Service Provider18% Financial Services Firm8% Government4% | Computer Software Company13% Manufacturing Company13% Comms Service Provider13% Energy/Utilities Company9% Computer Software Company51% Comms Service Provider11% Educational Organization5% Energy/Utilities Company4% | Computer Software Company31% Comms Service Provider14% Financial Services Firm9% Insurance Company6% |
Company Size | ||
No Data Available | Small Business24% Midsize Enterprise14% Large Enterprise63% | Small Business38% Midsize Enterprise10% Large Enterprise52% |
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Identity Governance vs. SailPoint IdentityIQ and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
455,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Oracle Identity Governance is ranked 4th in User Provisioning Software with 7 reviews while SailPoint IdentityIQ is ranked 2nd in User Provisioning Software with 6 reviews. Oracle Identity Governance is rated 6.8, while SailPoint IdentityIQ is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Oracle Identity Governance writes "Enables us to understand a customer's interests but it is missing a lot ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SailPoint IdentityIQ writes "ROI has been outstanding and our user onboarding time has been significantly decreased". Oracle Identity Governance is most compared with One Identity Manager, ForgeRock, Symantec Identity Governance and Administration and CyberArk PAS, whereas SailPoint IdentityIQ is most compared with CyberArk PAS, Microsoft Identity Manager, ForgeRock, One Identity Manager and One Identity Active Roles. See our Oracle Identity Governance vs. SailPoint IdentityIQ report.
See our list of best User Provisioning Software vendors and best Identity Management (IM) vendors.
We monitor all User Provisioning Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.