We performed a comparison between RadView WebLOAD and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools."The solution is simple and useful."
"The most valuable aspect is that the IDE is simple and it's quick to complete the process."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is reporting."
"What I like most about Visual Studio Test Professional is the way people publish templates and publish integration."
"Its initial setup process is easy."
"The tool is flexible and easy to manage. We use it since it is scalable and easy to use. It integrates with solutions."
"Customization is the most powerful feature of this product."
"The most valuable feature has been to store all our packages in one place including SSIS packages, SQL tables, TFS and SSR."
"The user interface is very friendly."
"Visual Studio is highly powerful. It's probably the best software development tool on the market."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a scalable solution."
"Technical support is slow and wastes a lot of time, so it needs to be improved."
"There is no analytical dashboard."
"The reporting side of things is really complicated. It's difficult to get out exactly what you're looking for, there are almost too many options."
"Enhancing the support for web application testing and load performance would be an improvement."
"The server that we use is very slow so that is concerning for us."
"Sometimes, the solution hangs, so its performance could be improved."
"We would like to be able to easily integrate this solution with our continuous integration tools, such as Jenkins."
"It is not good in terms of performance. When you open Visual Studio, you have to wait for a while to process your code. It uses a lot of resources and has a lot of features. If we could disable some of the features, it would be lighter and faster to use. Nowadays, for some of the projects, we use VS Code for JavaScript or Python. VS Code is very light and easy to use, whereas, in Visual Studio, we have to wait because it takes time to compile or run a project. It has a lot of competitors in terms of performance, such as Intelligent ID. Intelligent ID is very easy to use. It has many features, and it is lighter to use than Visual Studio. In terms of error handling, sometimes, it shows an error before you finish your code, which can be improved. It would be good if it has a version for Linux. I use VS Code on Linux, but I am not sure if Visual Studio has a version for Linux."
"It needs more integration with other tools for monitoring. Microsoft also needs to make it more modern to make it work with microservices and the cloud. It is a bit outdated currently."
"One of the problems with this solution is you need to be highly technically skilled to operate it, it is not for everyone."
"The pricing of this solution should be lowered."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
RadView WebLOAD is ranked 11th in Performance Testing Tools with 9 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 46 reviews. RadView WebLOAD is rated 8.2, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of RadView WebLOAD writes "IDE is simple and it's quick to complete the process but the reporting is complicated". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". RadView WebLOAD is most compared with Tricentis NeoLoad, Apache JMeter, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, BlazeMeter and k6 Open Source, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText UFT One.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.