We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare RadView WebLOAD vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Micro Focus, SmartBear and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: September 2021.
542,267 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable feature of this solution is reporting.""The most valuable aspect is that the IDE is simple and it's quick to complete the process."

More RadView WebLOAD Pros »

"The setup is easy and straightforward.""The solution is very stable; there's nothing in relation to stability to complain about.""The most valuable features are the SSIS reports, the deployment models, and the ability to interact with other Microsoft tools.""The most valuable feature is the in-built support for C# and .NET projects.""Performance-wise, it is a great tool.""The most valuable features are tools like IntelliSense and ReSharper.""It is a very common and strong product. A lot of support is available for this product.""It is very easy to use. You can handle a lot of things together at once in one package, which is a good point for us."

More Visual Studio Test Professional Pros »

Cons
"Technical support is slow and wastes a lot of time, so it needs to be improved.""The reporting side of things is really complicated. It's difficult to get out exactly what you're looking for, there are almost too many options."

More RadView WebLOAD Cons »

"The data flow can be improved.""The database administration could be better; you should be able to choose new tools with the development environment in Visual Studio. It could be easier to use.""The documents on the Microsoft website are not very useful, and they ought to make it easier to find answers.""We would like to be able to easily integrate this solution with our continuous integration tools, such as Jenkins.""The pricing of this solution should be lowered.""The integration with Git needs improving because it is a bit disjointed and unpredictable.""It needs more integration with other tools for monitoring. Microsoft also needs to make it more modern to make it work with microservices and the cloud. It is a bit outdated currently.""It is not good in terms of performance. When you open Visual Studio, you have to wait for a while to process your code. It uses a lot of resources and has a lot of features. If we could disable some of the features, it would be lighter and faster to use. Nowadays, for some of the projects, we use VS Code for JavaScript or Python. VS Code is very light and easy to use, whereas, in Visual Studio, we have to wait because it takes time to compile or run a project. It has a lot of competitors in terms of performance, such as Intelligent ID. Intelligent ID is very easy to use. It has many features, and it is lighter to use than Visual Studio. In terms of error handling, sometimes, it shows an error before you finish your code, which can be improved. It would be good if it has a version for Linux. I use VS Code on Linux, but I am not sure if Visual Studio has a version for Linux."

More Visual Studio Test Professional Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"We purchased a license for two years.""It costs $8,600 yearly and we have the Cloud, which is an additional $800. Our perpetual license is $800 and then the Cloud functionality with our 500 users is the $8,600."

More RadView WebLOAD Pricing and Cost Advice »

"I think that the pricing is quite good.""The pricing is expensive."

More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
542,267 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The stability has always been very good.
Top Answer: We aren't bothered by the pricing of the solution at all due to the fact that it provides us with a lot of great tools. The pricing is high, however, it's a single tool that allows you to do a lot of… more »
Top Answer: In Visual Studio we still don't have anything which can pinpoint memory leaks on a certain code line. It gives me memory analysis, however, it's not taking me to the code lines. That's what I was… more »
Ranking
12th
Views
2,120
Comparisons
1,032
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
597
Rating
5.5
8th
Views
3,197
Comparisons
2,580
Reviews
13
Average Words per Review
356
Rating
8.4
Comparisons
Learn More
Radview
Video Not Available
Overview

WebLOAD is an enterprise scale load testing product that powers the most demanding performance experts in the world. WebLOAD supports hundreds of technologies. DevOps teams will feel right at home with WebLOAD's flexible built-in scripting capabilities.

Visual Studio Professional Edition provides an IDE for all supported development languages. As of Visual Studio 2010, the Standard edition was dropped. MSDN support is available as MSDN Essentials or the full MSDN library depending on licensing. It supports XML and XSLT editing, and can create deployment packages that only use ClickOnce and MSI. It includes tools like Server Explorer and integration with Microsoft SQL Server also. Windows Mobile development support was included in Visual Studio 2005 Standard, however, with Visual Studio 2008, it is only available in Professional and higher editions. Windows Phone 7 development support was added to all editions in Visual Studio 2010. Development for Windows Mobile is no longer supported in Visual Studio 2010; it is superseded by Windows Phone 7.
Offer
Learn more about RadView WebLOAD
Learn more about Visual Studio Test Professional
Sample Customers
GoDaddy, Praxair, DeVry University and the College Board.
Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm57%
Healthcare Company29%
University14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm9%
Educational Organization5%
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company36%
Manufacturing Company18%
Transportation Company9%
Healthcare Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider19%
Government8%
Financial Services Firm7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business10%
Large Enterprise90%
REVIEWERS
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise71%
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Micro Focus, SmartBear and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: September 2021.
542,267 professionals have used our research since 2012.

RadView WebLOAD is ranked 12th in Performance Testing Tools with 2 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 8th in Functional Testing Tools with 12 reviews. RadView WebLOAD is rated 5.6, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of RadView WebLOAD writes "Good reporting, but the developers need the ability to write their own code ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Offers lots of features, including memory analysis and code sharing". RadView WebLOAD is most compared with Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, BlazeMeter and Selenium HQ, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Katalon Studio, Tricentis Tosca and HCL AppScan.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.