We performed a comparison between Visual Studio Test Professional and Worksoft Certify based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool is flexible and easy to manage. We use it since it is scalable and easy to use. It integrates with solutions."
"Customization is the most powerful feature of this product."
"The most valuable feature of Visual Studio Test Professional is its ease of use."
"It is very easy to use. You can handle a lot of things together at once in one package, which is a good point for us."
"The most valuable features of Visual Studio Test Professional are the IntelliSense and the ease of adding the NuGet packages."
"The setup is easy and straightforward."
"The product is good to create big or small projects fastly. It is one of the leaders in the area."
"The solution is very stable."
"We have been able to save on a lot of manual work for some very high skilled, expensive resources. This has been able to free up a significant amount of their time so they can spend more time on innovation and more creative, value-add activities. That's been one of the more rewarding things that we've done, and the most appreciated."
"The most valuable features of Worksoft Certify are the way we can maintain the processes and sub-processes inside. We can immediately identify and replicate multiple objects in the application without having a major issue with it. We are able to do a lot of operations even with the solution being completely scriptless. That is a large advantage compared with other automation tools."
"The tool itself is highly effective, especially when it comes to comprehensibility for newcomers."
"The ability to work with the data, with recordsets, and plug those into the scripts is very easy and very powerful. We use it extensively."
"Mostly in the area of project testing, the most immediate benefit is when you historically have manual testers do a certain job, and a full regression testing was previously done 100 percent manually. We have had cases where the release testing for an entire region would take around 12 weeks. With Worksoft, we are now down to two to three weeks. So, that is one use case where we have had success."
"It's module based and it's giving functionality."
"We prefer Worksoft over other platforms because it's a low-code solution"
"Provides all the in-built functionalities and is a wonderful tool."
"The service right now is far too expensive. You need to pay per user."
"The integration with Git needs improving because it is a bit disjointed and unpredictable."
"The data flow can be improved."
"Sometimes Visual Studio is slow. It uses a lot of resources like memory and processing power. You should optimize the performance by only installing what you need on your machine. Don't install unnecessary things that will slow your machine."
"The server that we use is very slow so that is concerning for us."
"In Visual Studio we still don't have anything which can pinpoint memory leaks on a certain code line."
"Visual Studio Test Professional needs to improve its stability."
"There are too many features with the product and I would like there to be less."
"Better automation capability would be helpful."
"We're really hopeful for the mobile testing in Worksoft Certify going forward."
"I would like BPP to have more filtering options during the report creation. This would make our customers happy."
"One feature that could be added to Capture 2.0 is generating a PDF file from your capture, so you can see your screenshots and steps."
"When it comes to mobile testing, we have a small bottleneck there. You have to buy third-party separate licenses if you want to test on a mobile. Business wise we see room for improvement there, although it's that really critical for us."
"The technical support has been good, but sometimes there are little delays. A lot of times when we need support, it's an emergency situation."
"I would like to see the impact analysis integrated with the performance testing tool. We have multiple tools doing multiple items. I would like to have one common tool."
"I would like the GUI to be more user-friendly and intuitive. We want to be able to move assets from project to another project without having to be in the same project or the same folder structure."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 46 reviews while Worksoft Certify is ranked 6th in Functional Testing Tools with 64 reviews. Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6, while Worksoft Certify is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Worksoft Certify writes "Enables us to automate end-to-end testing of our integration between S/4HANA and Salesforce.com". Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText UFT One, whereas Worksoft Certify is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Selenium HQ, OpenText UFT One, Katalon Studio and Panaya Test Dynamix. See our Visual Studio Test Professional vs. Worksoft Certify report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
