IBM Integration Bus Previous Solutions

Jagan Chidella
Systems Software Specialist III at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees
Prior to this solution, we used TIBCO. I was not involved in the integration bus, so I don't know the history before we moved to IBM. View full review »
Pavel Shcherbukha
Team Leader of the Development Team at IBM/IT-Innovation
We used to use client-service applications with strong integration between application. The company implemented many other applications with different interfaces and aimed to link with external services. So that we started using Integration bus for integration legacy application with new applications. View full review »
NaveenTak
Senior Integration Consultant at Candela Labs (AWPL reborn)
We did not switch. Wherever I have implemented it, it was either: * IIB/WMB was already there. * It was the preferred choice. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in ESB. Updated: March 2020.
407,096 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer703206
Enterprise Solution Architect at a transportation company with 5,001-10,000 employees
When I started at the facility, they were using CORBA (Common Object Request Broker) for the integration. It was used very intensively, and the project to introduce this solution was the replacement. View full review »
Sandeep Chukkapalli
Senior Software Engineer at a software R&D company with 10,001+ employees
I didn't previously use a different solution. View full review »
Wael Alhasan
Middleware Architect at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
I have prior experience with Oracle. The work bus and the the word map is totally different from Oracle. In Oracle you're doing the job management most of the time, in IBM product, their version, it's much easier. You just try to sync with it and that's all. IBM is an easier product to use. I also have prior experience with Microsoft, but that was in 2008. At that time, there were issues with integration View full review »
YaroslavLatushkin
Team Lead and Senior Architect at FCL
We previously used other solutions, including Oracle, specifically Oracle Fusion Middleware. IBM is much better. It has many more options and offers more functionality. IBM offers better customization, configuration, and options in general. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in ESB. Updated: March 2020.
407,096 professionals have used our research since 2012.