IBM Rational Performance Tester Initial Setup

it_user323943 - PeerSpot reviewer
Netcool Engineer with 10,001+ employees

After the product installation, there was no need to change the default application parameters. The default configuration served our purposes ‘out-of-the-box’. The requirement and installation of the IBM certificate to allow the tests to be captured was resolved with IBM RPT support. By creating a “Development”, “Production” and “Archive” project folders, it was very easy to create, test and archive the library of tests that had been created over time.

View full review »
it_user326904 - PeerSpot reviewer
Quality Assurance Software Testing Lead at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Straightforward. Some issues if you previously had HP UFT, QTP or Performance Center software installed. I would recommend a re-imaging prior to installing IBM if you had HP previously.

View full review »
it_user327324 - PeerSpot reviewer
Rational Tools Administrator for the National Science Foundation (NSF) at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

The initial setup itself was straightforward, but resolving the various issues after deployment took a couple weeks.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Test Management Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, OpenText, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: April 2024.
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
RM
Testing Tool Expert at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

For a rational performance testing solution, the initial setup is very complex. The setup was difficult and the documentation was not very up to date. The documentation is also too simple; it's good for making simple operations, but when the difficulty level is a bit higher, you will need IBM to help you. You can get lost in the process very quickly. 

We need between two and five people to maintain the solution.

View full review »
it_user262080 - PeerSpot reviewer
Architect Software Test Engineer at MAS Global Consulting

The setup was straightforward, it depends on the company's regulations and infrastructure policies.

View full review »
it_user327495 - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate - Projects at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Straightforward.

View full review »
it_user324369 - PeerSpot reviewer
QA Automation Engineer II / Developer II at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

It was complex.

View full review »
it_user313104 - PeerSpot reviewer
Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

It wasn't complex as the documentation is vast.

View full review »
it_user302109 - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Team Leader - Performance Testing Practice at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

It was straightforward.

View full review »
it_user309168 - PeerSpot reviewer
IBM Rational Consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

It was straightforward.

View full review »
it_user303027 - PeerSpot reviewer
Performance & Functional Automation Lead at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

It was complex.

View full review »
KJ
CEO at a tech consulting company with 11-50 employees

It was straightforward. It takes hardly a day to install and configure everything.

View full review »
it_user323781 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Software Specialist for Development Tools with 51-200 employees

It depends on the scope, complexity and expected load. After introducing Load Generator Agent, as I already mentioned, setting up environment and capacity planning became simpler.

View full review »
it_user323631 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Consultant - Performance Testing at a construction company with 1,001-5,000 employees

The initial setup was not difficult and proper instruction guides are provided with sufficient step by step instructions.

View full review »
it_user280629 - PeerSpot reviewer
Performance Test Lead, Lexus Driver Portal – BRRI Program at a transportation company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Implementation is simple, but exploring the capability of this tools hasn't being marketed as well as LoadRunner/Performance Center 12 has been. More education needs to be provided to users.

View full review »
it_user649818 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Test Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

The installation and tool setup can take some time since this involves several components. A review of the licensing implementation would help here.

View full review »
it_user341016 - PeerSpot reviewer
Java Developer + Workflow/Process Automation Developer with 501-1,000 employees

It is complex for a novice.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Test Management Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, OpenText, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: April 2024.
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.