Our company used the tool to monitor the solutions and infrastructure in our environment which included it for our monitoring solutions, to monitor the infrastructure in all our environments such as networking, storage, and all the physical and virtual servers. We used it daily to check for both checking alerts and monitor monitoring the infrastructure, as well as configurations to ensure thresholds were correct.

We are a managed services provider, so we use Icinga to monitor our customers' Windows and Linux systems. Furthermore, we are performing basic checks on their applications (like Databases, Web servers, mail servers, or other applications). 

I use the product for server and network device monitoring. A team of five people is managing the solution, and around 50 people are using the solution in the organization.

We primarily use the solution in order to monitor our systems, including the resources. 

We use it for monitoring our network devices and the systems for the server.

Icinga is used for monitoring infrastructure devices like network devices, firewalls, and lots of servers. Linux, Windows, and many services are running on them using plugins, which are being distributed together with Icinga. We have developed some software in-house, so we use that as well.

The solution is deployed on-premises. I'm using version 2.9.

There are about 40 people using this solution.

The installations we have done were pretty complete, but we're always looking for other opportunities to install Icinga in our customers' networks. We're actively promoting Icinga to our customers.

The main use case for Icinga is mostly for monitoring Linux servers and AIX servers. While Microsoft provides numerous tools for Windows, there are limited options for monitoring Linux directly and getting a dashboard to extend its capabilities. 

Therefore, Icinga serves as a tool for monitoring Linux and AIX-related health checks, different services and processes running in and out of the system, and overall system health. 

Additionally, it facilitates automated ticket incident generation and alerting, making it an indispensable tool for efficiently managing and maintaining our systems.

I use Icinga in my company for monitoring and analysis to see what happens in my organization's servers, especially regarding CPU utilization, RAM space, and so on.

Icinga was created as a fork of the Nagios monitoring system. They are similar in graphics and other features, but most who have used Nagios have changed over to Icinga.

It was deployed using our enterprise application to monitor different services.

We use Icinga for the user portal.

At this time we use Icinga to just do basic monitoring of our existing infrastructure. We are using SNMP Traps in all devices in addition so that when anything happens on the device it sends an SNMP alert. We can use this solution online or it can send us an email as well.

We started troubleshooting that issue as soon as we saw it. Icinga has a reactive approach. I think the solution is forewarning us but we are looking for some solution which can take a proactive initiative as well. For example, if the CPU is going too high or the net visualization is less than 90%, we should get information about such situations so that we can take actions accordingly to fix the problem.

The primary use case of this solution is for surveillance for some of the servers for our clients.

Flexibility.

To monitor IT infrastructure. To monitor and to see transfers.

It has performed well. I like this product.