Pivotal Cloud Foundry is stable.

Until now, I haven't done many things in the solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a three out of ten.

The solution is stable and resilient. In our company, we do not even see any challenges with the solution.

The stability is pretty good. 

The only other issue that we foresee is with the GTM router. It is not configured based on application instances but rather on application groups. This means that if I define a group of application instances, such as A and B, and I want to route traffic to A and B based on some specific code, such as 50% of traffic going to group A and the other 50% going to group B, the GTM router will not be able to do that.

Instead, it will route traffic to the two groups in a 50/50 split, regardless of the number of application instances in each group. For example, if one project has 100 application instances and the other project has 10 application instances, the GTM router will still route traffic to the two groups in a 50/50 split. This means that we are not able to fine-tune the routing to specific application groups.

I give the stability a nine out of ten.

Pivotal Cloud Foundry is stable.

The stability of Pivotal Cloud Foundry is good, I never had any issues.

The stability is good. I'd rate it eight out of ten. 

The stability is good, and we don't see any downtime, and we don't see performance issues, or memory leaks.

The stability of Pivotal Cloud Foundry is good.

It's a stable product.

It provides great stability.  

Stability is not a concern with this product. It is pretty much stable.

The solution is stable. Sometimes it shows some downtime, but I'm relatively satisfied.

The solution is stable. We have not experienced any infrastructure issues, so it is very good and captures a few metrics, onboarding to App Dynamics. From App Dynamics, we were able to create some meaningful dashboards.