We performed a comparison between Bizagi, Genpact Cora SeQuence, and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation."The product enables the users to automate the processes and provides a good user experience."
"The solution's simulation capabilities are the most valuable aspects."
"Bizagi is a very useful tool because it does not require you to program. The user logic is very easy to understand even for people who are not engineers or developers."
"Agility, reverse engineering, customized portal web, help desk and user guides, easy deployment, simple to modify."
"It has an easy to use interface which final users accepted with much more enthusiasm than our ERP (SAP)."
"Very user friendly and a professional solution."
"Great mapping feature that's easy to use."
"The most beneficial features of Bizagi for our business processes are its seamless connectivity between process elements and its ability to automate tasks and perform simulations."
"It is very stable. There is no downtime."
"The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good."
"The messaging part is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature of the webMethods Integration Server is the built-in monitoring, auditing, RETS, and SOAP services."
"What I like best about webMethods Integration Server is its portfolio of connectors."
"One of the most important features is that it gives you the possibility to do low-level integration. It provides a lot of features out of the box, and over the years, it has matured so much that any problem that is there in the market can be solved with this product. We can meet any requirements through customizations, transformations, or the logic that needs to be put in. Some of the other products struggle in this aspect. They cannot do things in a certain way, or they have a product limitation, whereas, with webMethods, I have never faced this kind of problem."
"Operationally, I consider the solution to be quite good."
"It's obvious that the heart of the product lies here. It's comprised of all aspects of ESB (Enterprise Gateway, Adapter, TN, Java) and BPM (task, rules engine)."
"It is a bundled product stack for A2A and B2B usage. It is one of the best products which I have used during my integration career."
"Some of the key features are the integration platform, query mechanism, message handling within the bus, and the rules engine. We've had a really good experience with webMethods Integration Server."
"When you start working with information modeling, et cetera, here is no really good solution for the data modeling and information modeling."
"I'm not really satisfied with the reporting aspect."
"Can be difficult for new users."
"They should improve the migration process between major versions, from version 9 to 10, we had to redo our implementation."
"It would be useful if we can connect Bizagi to other solutions, such as a local financial solution or Power BI. It would also be good and helpful to be able to connect Bizagi to some services solutions. It should also support right-to-left languages, such as Arabic."
"The technical support is not fast enough and should be improved."
"The open source version lacks the option to publish."
"The gateway through which it connects with other vendors, specifically RPA vendors, is one aspect that could be improved."
"The setup and configuration is complex."
"The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more user-friendly."
"I would like to have a dashboard where I can see all of the communication between components and the configuration."
"Documentation needs tuning. There is a lot of dependency with SoftwareAG. Even with the documentation at hand, you can struggle to implement scenarios without SAG’s help. By contrast, IBM’s documentation is self-explanatory, in my opinion."
"The UI for the admin console is very old. It hasn't been updated for years and is pretty much the same one that we started with. This is something that could be refreshed and made more modern."
"Other products have been using AI and cloud enhancements, but webMethods Integration Server is still lagging in that key area."
"I'd like to see the admin portal for managing the integration server go up a level, to have more capabilities and to be given a more modern web interface."
"There should be better logging, or a better dashboard, to allow you to see see the logs of the services."
"The product needs to be improved in a few ways. First, they need to stabilize the components of the whole platform across versions. Also, they should stop replacing old components with brand new ones and, rather, improve by evolution."
"We need more dashboards and reporting engines that can provide detailed information for management. In short, we need better analytics."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
