Box vs OpenText Extended ECM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Box Logo
Read 37 Box reviews
3,875 views|2,160 comparisons
86% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
4,062 views|3,113 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Box and OpenText Extended ECM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Box vs. OpenText Extended ECM Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The system's performance is impressive, and file sharing is notably straightforward.""The ability to collaborate around data anywhere, anytime is the most powerful features of Box.""The interface is very good.""File sharing, authorization on the back, its ease of use and reliable uptime performance are valuable features of this solution.""The most valuable feature of Box is security.""Simple file sharing and sync for internal and external customers.""Sharing and collaborating across files and folders has been a massive game changer.""It is really easy to load files to and from this solution."

More Box Pros →

"The solution's automatic document numbering, state management, and process flow are very useful features to go through the full cycle of the document.""OpenText Extended ECM's most valuable features include permissions and security models. I also like the tool's ability to add metadata and use it to categorize information.""Scalability is great. We can extend areas horizontally and vertically.""We also have a module on top of the Content Server called WebReports that has been one of the things that helped us facilitate the workflow and give managers good reporting and visibility into where everything is. Being able to use that on top of the Content Server was a big help.""WebReports has a lot of capabilities that offer good opportunities to customize the applications the way we want to.""Being able to search is valuable. Its search is pretty powerful. We are able to search for specific text, and it points us to the document that has that text. That is pretty powerful.""Simplicity to roll out, features available, customization options.""The ability to add metadata and use that to categorize information is a valuable feature of OpenText Extended ECM."

More OpenText Extended ECM Pros →

Cons
"One thing that Box would benefit from is a records management component.""If there was a plugin that added some sort of toolbar in Office, that would be great.""I would love to see the ability to invite collaborators extended to a file level, not just the folder level.""I find their API to be quite complex and it could be more straightforward.""I recommend doing the trial first, because it's not cheap ware. It's not overly expensive, but it's not cheap ware, and enterprise has a minimum number of users.""The room for improvement is in the area of integrations. They need to establish more integrations, especially with Office 365 and Outlook.""The upload speed needs improvement.""I don't like the low level of role-based security it provides – it's very cumbersome, and the support is ordinary at times."

More Box Cons →

"The initial setup can get really complicated, and it takes time.""When it comes to addressing complex use cases, three or four years ago, we ended up purchasing an additional OpenText product called AppWorks because we started to run into some limitations with the workflow that can be done in Extended ECM. It was a little limiting, so we ended up getting another product.""There are no additional features that I would like to see. I am pretty happy with it, but their support could be a bit better.""Pricing could be improved and the stability or the performance needs improvement, which is very important.""I have not used it enough to start running into issues. Some of my technical guys could name a couple of things, but in terms of support, we did have challenges getting good responses from them.""The architecture needs improvement, as it's complex.""User interface needs improvement (at least in the version we are using, desktop client).""The solution's performance, stability, and consistency could be improved."

More OpenText Extended ECM Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing may seem steep at first, but delve into the features and you'll soon realize it is incredible value for what you get."
  • "It is expensive per head, as you need the enterprise license to get full security and tools. So negotiate a discount!"
  • "Better sign a full year's contract to get a discount."
  • "I'm in Higher Ed, so we purchase through Internet2-Net+. I absolutely recommend going that route for Higher Ed customers."
  • "A business account has a minimum of three users. If you are more than three people in-house, go for the Enterprise version. All the external users are free of charge."
  • "Our pricing and licensing is excellent. I'd tell all Higher Ed customers to talk with Internet2 for excellent pricing and support."
  • "I believe Box is cheaper than SharePoint."
  • "They are very price competitive when pushed. Initially, they come out with a standard list price, but they are willing to be very competitive. The Box price was pretty much equal to or lower than the Citrix price, and Box has more features."
  • More Box Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The licensing is not that complex for the core products, but it becomes more complicated for some additional modules."
  • "Both Open Text ECM and IBM File share are expensive."
  • "It is a little more expensive than our previous solution, but because of the fact that it has become a rallying point for different groups to come under, it might end up paying off better in the long run by not having seven siloed solutions. Even though this one solution is a little pricey, it might eliminate other ones."
  • "The tool's pricing is confusing to the end customer."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "OpenText Extended ECM is an expensive solution."
  • "The product is pricey."
  • "OpenText Extended ECM's pricing and licensing are aggressive and confusing for the end customer."
  • More OpenText Extended ECM Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution is used for data storage and any kind of visualization.
    Top Answer:The solution does not have the feature to retrieve deleted data. The solution's data security should be improved. While outsiders cannot access it, people within the organization can access the data… more »
    Top Answer:We also have a module on top of the Content Server called WebReports that has been one of the things that helped us facilitate the workflow and give managers good reporting and visibility into where… more »
    Top Answer:It is a little more expensive than our previous solution, but because of the fact that it has become a rallying point for different groups to come under, it might end up paying off better in the long… more »
    Top Answer:We make iterations on it. Every year, they usually ask for some small things. Overall, they are pretty happy with it. Being the IT person here, I do think there are areas for improvement, but both for… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    3,875
    Comparisons
    2,160
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    366
    Rating
    8.2
    Views
    4,062
    Comparisons
    3,113
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    692
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    SharePoint logo
    Compared 25% of the time.
    Microsoft OneDrive logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Citrix ShareFile logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Office 365 logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Egnyte logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Also Known As
    OpenText Content Suite Platform
    Learn More
    Overview

    Box is a Modern Content Management Platform for companies of all sizes and industries. The difference that Box brings is that it offers the security and controls admins need with the sharing and collaboration capabilities end users want. Box has made it easier for people to securely share ideas, collaborate and get work done faster. Today, more than 62,000 businesses, including 59% of the Fortune 500, trust Box to manage content in the cloud.

    The Box platform provides HIPAA, FINRA, FedRAMP, and many other compliances to go with granular access permissions and advanced security capabilities.

    By using Box you can sync, share, and collaborate on all types of files, anywhere, on any device - but that's just the beginning. You can choose where to store your data, to manage your own encryption keys, and set workflows to automate content-based processes. You can also assign custom metadata tags to content, watermark sensitive content, and set file retention or legal hold policies.

    Box has deep, native integrations with Microsoft Office and Outlook, Google Apps for Work, Salesforce, Netsuite, Docusign, Adobe, and many other best-of-breed solutions you may already be using.

    OpenText Extended ECM (formerly OpenText Content Suite Platform) is an enterprise content management platform that securely governs the information lifecycle by integrating with leading enterprise applications, such as SAP, Microsoft 365, Salesforce and SAP SuccessFactors. Bringing content and processes together, Extended ECM provides access to information when and where it’s needed, improves decision-making and drives operational effectiveness.

    Sample Customers
    GE, Toyota, P&G, Caterpillar, Flex, Schneider Electric, Sally Beauty, Eurostar, AstraZeneca, AirBnB, Whirlpool, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Nationwide, Aeropostale etc
    ATCO Australia, MSIG Asia, Orica, Salt River Project
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Non Tech Company25%
    University9%
    Real Estate/Law Firm9%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization48%
    Computer Software Company7%
    Financial Services Firm5%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Energy/Utilities Company18%
    Manufacturing Company18%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government13%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise55%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise52%
    Large Enterprise34%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Box vs. OpenText Extended ECM
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Box vs. OpenText Extended ECM and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Box is ranked 4th in Enterprise Content Management with 37 reviews while OpenText Extended ECM is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Content Management with 18 reviews. Box is rated 8.4, while OpenText Extended ECM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Box writes "Used for data storage and data collaboration, but its data security could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Extended ECM writes "Serves as a single source of support for the company but has scalability issues". Box is most compared with SharePoint, Microsoft OneDrive, Citrix ShareFile, Office 365 and Egnyte, whereas OpenText Extended ECM is most compared with OpenText Documentum, SharePoint, IBM FileNet and Alfresco. See our Box vs. OpenText Extended ECM report.

    See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.