Compare Hyland OnBase vs. IBM FileNet

Hyland OnBase is ranked 12th in Enterprise Content Management while IBM FileNet is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Content Management with 50 reviews. Hyland OnBase is rated 0, while IBM FileNet is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM FileNet writes "Scales as needed and provides thorough security features for enterprise-class businesses". Hyland OnBase is most compared with Perceptive Software ImageNow, SharePoint and IBM FileNet, whereas IBM FileNet is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText ECM and Alfresco.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hyland OnBase Logo
5,644 views|4,167 comparisons
IBM FileNet Logo
11,118 views|7,000 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Hyland OnBase? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, OpenText and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: August 2019.
366,090 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Yearly, we pay for the maintenance, which is $20,000.The solution saves time and money. It helps us to be able to accomplish the goals of our business, as opposed to being tangled in the weeds of what we could do.It has reduced operating costs by reducing the amount of manual work needed.We use extraction. Therefore, we can see 80 to 85 percent accuracy on data extraction. This reduces the manual indexing part, which is definitely a gain on performance efficiency.My customers have seen ROI. There have been productivity gains, time savings gains, and things that they have been doing much more efficiently in a more modern way than they were before.Talking about the cost is difficult because IBM has offers that combine different products, and each of these offers has different types of licensing. IBM also has a policy that the actual price for a given customer may be very different from the stated book price. It's hard to say whether it's expensive or not.The physical space that we have gained back pays for the service. Therefore, it has reduced our operating costs overall. We have definitely seen ROI. I would estimate $30,000 a year.1. It will be more expensive than estimated to setup. 2. You will need to double the staff while you are running the old system and installing the new system. 3. Depending on the number of documents to be migrated, make sure you understand the potentially massive amount of time and effort required to migrate the existing content to the new platform.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
366,090 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
5,644
Comparisons
4,167
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
11,118
Comparisons
7,000
Reviews
49
Average Words per Review
500
Avg. Rating
8.3
Top Comparisons
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Also Known As
OnBase
Learn
Hyland
IBM
Overview
OnBase enterprise content management software combines integrated document management, business process management and records management in a single application. Whether deployed as a hosted or premises-based solution, OnBase allows organizations to automate business processes and reduce the time and cost of performing important business functions through the management and control of content.

IBM FileNet is a leading IBM enterprise content management product family. IBM FileNet is one of the ECM solutions that can change the way a company does business by enabling users to capture, activate, socialize, analyze, and govern content throughout its lifecycle.

There are many IBM FileNet products available, all of which are integrated and based on the FileNet P8 Platform.

Offer
Learn more about Hyland OnBase
Learn more about IBM FileNet
Sample Customers
Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University HospitalSuncorp Group Limited, St. Vincent Health, Citigroup, SRCSD, and UK Dept for Work and Pensions.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm11%
Manufacturing Company11%
Legal Firm9%
Software R&D Company9%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm34%
Insurance Company14%
Healthcare Company13%
Government7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm30%
Software R&D Company24%
Manufacturing Company8%
Comms Service Provider7%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, OpenText and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: August 2019.
366,090 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email