Compare Hyland OnBase vs. IBM FileNet

Hyland OnBase is ranked 12th in Enterprise Content Management while IBM FileNet is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Content Management with 60 reviews. Hyland OnBase is rated 0, while IBM FileNet is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM FileNet writes "Easy to integrate, and enables our clients to guarantee compliance". Hyland OnBase is most compared with SharePoint, Perceptive Software ImageNow and IBM FileNet, whereas IBM FileNet is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText ECM and IBM ECM.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hyland OnBase Logo
5,330 views|3,954 comparisons
IBM FileNet Logo
12,223 views|6,991 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Hyland OnBase? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Oracle and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: February 2020.
398,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
FileNet is quite expensive, although Documentum is expensive too.Licensing costs depend on the size of the storage.The cost is about $40,000, plus yearly maintenance.The licensing cost of FileNet is comparable.When it comes to pricing, IBM needs to make an effort to improve the cost. That's the main issue regarding use of FinalNet in Columbia.Yearly, we pay for the maintenance, which is $20,000.The solution saves time and money. It helps us to be able to accomplish the goals of our business, as opposed to being tangled in the weeds of what we could do.It has reduced operating costs by reducing the amount of manual work needed.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
398,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
5,330
Comparisons
3,954
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
12,223
Comparisons
6,991
Reviews
60
Average Words per Review
615
Avg. Rating
8.2
Top Comparisons
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Also Known As
OnBase
Learn
Hyland
IBM
Overview
OnBase enterprise content management software combines integrated document management, business process management and records management in a single application. Whether deployed as a hosted or premises-based solution, OnBase allows organizations to automate business processes and reduce the time and cost of performing important business functions through the management and control of content.

IBM FileNet is a leading IBM enterprise content management product family. IBM FileNet is one of the ECM solutions that can change the way a company does business by enabling users to capture, activate, socialize, analyze, and govern content throughout its lifecycle.

There are many IBM FileNet products available, all of which are integrated and based on the FileNet P8 Platform.

Offer
Learn more about Hyland OnBase
Learn more about IBM FileNet
Sample Customers
Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University HospitalSuncorp Group Limited, St. Vincent Health, Citigroup, SRCSD, and UK Dept for Work and Pensions.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company23%
Comms Service Provider9%
Government7%
Media Company6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm35%
Insurance Company15%
Healthcare Company11%
Manufacturing Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company38%
Comms Service Provider21%
Financial Services Firm9%
Government5%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Oracle and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: February 2020.
398,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.