Informatica Data Quality Room for Improvement
The visualization is very limited. It's not modern age, it's not self-service BI. It only has three levels of granularity on which you can present data and that's not enough. What's more, we had a few problems with the configuration. At times we found it difficult to integrate with other systems, but it turned out that the problem wasn't with the solution but with our firewalls. We had a couple of bugs but they are all fixed now. Another feature I would also like to see is tagging. At this stage, we can't tag data in the database of the data source with particular data flows. This is a nice feature that other solutions have and that Informatica lacks. We have to analyze and store data in a database and then we have to analyze it again and go through the servers. This takes up double storage. So if the data could be tagged at the database instead, anybody who has access to this data will know if there is a problem with the accuracy or anything else. View full review »
I would like to see better visuals for business users, such as a dashboard where they can precisely track where problems are. You should be able to better visualize data quality. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica Data Quality vs. SAP Data Services and other solutions. Updated: May 2020.
418,116 professionals have used our research since 2012.