I rate .NET Framework’s stability a nine out of ten.

It is definitely stable. If I compare it with previous versions, it is constantly improving.

When utilizing Azure for hosting, the stability can be unreliable and inconsistent. It becomes a hit-or-miss situation. As a result, we prefer to host everything in our private cloud rather than relying on Microsoft's cloud services, as the stability is not optimal in the latter case.

The solution is stable.

I rate the stability of Microsoft .NET Framework a ten out of ten.

The .NET Framework is stable, with a few exceptions. With the release of .NET Framework 4.6.2, where significant changes were made regarding TLS and SSL certificates, resulting in the duplication of TLS 1.0. Legacy products reliant on TLS 1.0 may encounter compatibility issues when migrating to this newer version of the framework.

The solution is stable. It is more stable than SAP.

It is a stable solution. Ten years ago, the product was not very stable.

The solution is stable.

Our client utilizes the Microsoft Stack. Therefore, we must collaborate with them for internal Proof of Concept (POC) and presentations to attract new clients. We have around 250 Microsoft users. Within this context, various components such as ETA, specific developers, working with Azure, and blockchain development are conducted within Azure.

It's stable.

It is a stable platform. Although, we encounter memory consumption issues when there are a lot of concurrent requests. It should give error messages when it is about to reach the capacity limit.

The tool’s stability is good. I rate the stability a seven and a half out of ten.

There have been some issues with the running application crashing.

My impression is that this solution is stable.

The tool was stable.

This is a stable solution.

This solution is stable if the logic is handled sufficiently. It all depends on what kind of coding you are doing while you are developing the application.

The product is stable.

Microsoft has tested the solution and our experience with it has shown us that, while it is not as fast as some of our other software-devoted platforms, it is very stable. It's integrated with the platform and very stable on Microsoft Platform. There are certain applications we build on it which work very well and we do not experience downtime.

The stability is outstanding. I encountered no issues, with any concerns primarily related to infrastructure servers rather than the .NET framework itself. I would rate it nine out of ten.

Microsoft .NET Framework is a stable solution.

I rate Microsoft .NET Framework a nine out of ten for stability.

The stability of the current version of the product is very good. In the lower versions of the framework, sometimes I saw a crash but after version 4, I haven't seen any crashes. It is really, really stable and I like it. I wrote some services that have run for about a year without any crash at all. All issues with stability seem to be fixed.

I have not faced any issues with the stability of the product.

The solution is stable because Mircosoft releases updates frequently.

Microsoft .NET Framework is a stable solution.

Changes in technology generally happen faster than any single entity can keep up with. But the side-by-side Runyon capability handles most stability issues behind the scenes. 

The stability is fine. 

The solution has been very stable and reliable. We haven't had issues with bugs or crashes. 

It's a stable solution. 

It is stable.

The platform is very stable. I rate its stability a nine out of ten.

The framework is stable, but it depends on the size of the application. If it's a larger application running on multiple machines, you may experience issues because it's on Windows, the least stable platform. 

This is a very stable solution and we haven't had any issues.

This is a very stable platform for enterprise development. It has been maturing since its inception and is very helpful for delivering products.

We have issues with websites that are based on Angular, but the rest of the applications or websites are stable so far.

It usually takes a few months for each new version to become stable. 

The Microsoft .NET Framework is 100% stable. We have to use it for our day-to-day activities. Also, based on the business functionality you have to keep upgrading.

I have not encountered any stability issues.

It is a stable solution.

The on-premises solution is quite stable. 

The solution is stable. Aside from issues surrounding using Macs, it's not too glitchy. It doesn't freeze. It's pretty reliable.

The biggest problem with programming language nowadays, because there are a lot of things happening, is that changes happen too fast. Due to the competition, they tend to release new features almost every week. I don't think there's an exception on that one. In return, the application framework can have bugs in it. 

We have not had any issues with bugs or glitches.

I'd rate the solution as highly stable.

There were problems with the older versions of this solution. The newest version is stable, but sometimes you have multiple versions installed and you have to switch between them. You don't always know if you're compiling with the most recent version.