Microsoft Remote Desktop Services Reviews

In terms of the valuable features, I like the profile, the new version is really good.

The DB card needs improvement. I have a lot of experience with other competitors and Citrix is better than VMware and Microsoft. Citrix has more extensive features. 

I have been using this solution since 2003.

I haven't had to reach out to support. 

The pricing is fair. Our customers are satisfied. 

I would rate Microsoft Remote Desktop Services a seven out of ten. 

In the next release, there should be one management console to manage all of the servers and rules. That would be a good improvement. 

It also needs a better tool for monitoring. We need to test the user experience. 

We are using Cisco AnyConnect to create a VPN that Microsoft Remote Desktop Services uses to connect to and control a remote computer. 

The most valuable features are availability and security.

We are searching for a product with better remote access and remote sessions.

The user experience needs improvement.

We are only using Microsoft RDS on a temporary basis for people to work remotely during the COVID-19 crisis.

The scalability is limited to small and medium-sized organizations.

The technical support from Microsoft is very good.

Remote work is getting bigger and bigger and we are searching for a new solution that is more secure and provides more remote access features.

This is a good solution but Microsoft is not number one in the market for VDI. I would recommend it for a small to medium-sized business, but not for an enterprise-level company.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

It's simple and easy to use.

We've been providing Microsoft Remote Desktop Services for about 15 years.

Remote Desktop Services doesn't scale well. 

Microsoft support could be more accessible. They address issues quickly, but it's hard to reach them.

Installing Remote Desktop Services is straightforward. The basic deployment took about one workday. One engineer could handle it.

We have a monthly license.

I rate Microsoft Remote Desktop Services five out of 10. I would recommend it. 

It allows access to the computer from any location.

I can telecommute into the office. Since we have to be on a secure network, it gives me access into my system at work that is more secure than my system at home.

There could be better options and it could be faster. I haven't had too many issues with it, but it's just a very basic program.

I haven't had any issues with the stability of the product.

I haven't experienced any scalability issues. Although, I can see some issues with it but for a small company right now, it's working.

We were using a previous solution. However, I needed ways to telecommute to the office and I came across this solution; it seemed like the best bet.

In my opinion, important factors while selecting a vendor are reliability, support (if needed) and scalability of the solution.

We use this solution to test the conductivity from the user to the server equipment.

The most valuable features of the solution are ease of use and the simple environment.

There could be some improvement in the integration of the solution.

I have used the solution for approximately one year.

The solution is very stable.

I have found the solution scalable. We have approximately four people using this solution in my organization.

The installation is easy and the full deployment takes approximately eight hours.

The solution works very well for us and I recommend it to others.

I rate Microsoft Remote Desktop Services an eight out of ten.

The primary use case of this solution is for application virtualization, actual application location, and location setting.

The most valuable feature is ease of use.

While it's not expensive, the pricing could always be better.

I would like to see a web-based interface, instead of client installation to refresh the UI through HTML.

When comparing with other vendors offering applications not with a client module, but through the web through HTML, this should be the next step for Microsoft.

I have been using Remote Desktop Services for six years.

This is a stable solution and we have not experienced any issues.

We have not had any issues with scalability.

We have approximately 200 people using office applications centers.

We have not contacted technical support. We have experts locally to assist us with the box app in Microsoft. We were not faced with any serious problems.

It's not an expensive solution.

We are using a lot of Microsoft technologies. We have also tested their virtual desktop on Azure.

I would rate Microsoft Remote Desktop Services an eight out of ten.

We primarily use this product for application virtualization and application sharing.

The most valuable feature is the ease of use.

I would like to be able to access the remote desktop using a web-based interface, rather than having to use the client.

I have been working with Microsoft Remote Desktop Services for six years.

We have no trouble with stability at the moment.

This is a scalable product. We have about 200 people who are using Office applications.

We have local Microsoft technical support and we have never faced any serious problems.

I have used similar products by different vendors and the difference between Microsoft and the others is the client. Microsoft needs to have the client installed, whereas other vendors use a web-based interface.

Although not an expensive product, pricing is always something that can be improved.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

This is our primary tool for monitoring our services.

The most valuable feature is that it gives me full accessibility to my servers.

It is easy to configure.

Security in the connection between us and our clients' servers is something that can be improved.

We have been using Remote Desktop Services for about ten years.

This solution is extremely stable and we use it on a daily basis.

In my office, we have about ten people who are using Microsoft RDS.

We have not contacted Microsoft support for help with this product.

The initial setup is quite easy. 

We use a VPN between sites to provide our own security.

Overall, it is an excellent tool that works great and I would recommend it. The most important thing is to update and improve the security protocols.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.