We're still evaluating Camunda because we're looking for a lighter solution with easier deployment, but we didn't see much of the out-of-the-box support for the adapters that you get from Oracle BPM, which means we'll have to write codes should we decide to switch to Camunda.

We're currently busy, so we're not yet done with the evaluation. We may need to get in touch with the Camunda team to check if they can solve those problems, but right now, we're still with Oracle BPM.

I've focused on Oracle. I've done a lot of research, and I consider it one of the best solutions.

We have not switch yet, but I have been told we have some major transformations coming our way. We are evaluating if we should invest more on the Oracle side or if we can just check the other tools on the market, maybe use some other vendor, or if we are doing fine. We are looking to do some type of benchmark and maybe there will be fewer seats. It is likely that we will continue with Oracle, because we have good know-how on how Oracle BPM with good know-how from the programmers on the product. So, it is likely that we will select Oracle.

The only reason why I recommend Camunda over Oracle is because Camunda is open-source. However, Oracle’s performance is better than Camunda's.

Yes, Camunda BPM, IBM Process Server, and Appian.

Yes. IBM BPM, Appian, K2, and Captaris.

We did not evaluate any alternative solutions.