Quest KACE Systems Management Pricing
MW
Michael (Mikey) Wright
Systems Administrator at Custom Truck One Source
There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.
View full review »GR
reviewer1717593
Computer Management at University South Brittany
When you have a large number of computers, the price starts to become apparent.
View full review »SB
Scott Baxter
Technical Support Engineer at City of Rochester
Their pricing is per end-point device. There is an initial cost for the license for the server, which is pretty low, and then there is a per end-point device license, which is also fairly low. So, the pricing is still reasonable.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Quest KACE Systems Management
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about Quest KACE Systems Management. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
AS
Arlene Seale
Database Administrator at Department of National Defence - Canada
Based on other solutions that we had implemented, its pricing seems to be quite competitive. It is not inexpensive, but it is also not more expensive than any other solution. They have the standard licensing fees and support fees.
View full review »JT
reviewer1736463
IT Department at Garber Automotive Group
I would advise others to ensure you get the initial training when it is set up (we bought into KACE when Dell owned them). We did not get trained very well at all.
Make sure to know what all of you want, and ask questions.
View full review »Coming from a small business standpoint, they're really expensive for the number of users. But that's not necessarily a knock against them. They're producing a piece of software for a particular segment. I just do not think they necessarily designed their virtual appliance and their support for a ten-person company. They are expensive, but are they unjustifiably expensive? I can't say that.
View full review »DO
David Olsen
Assistant Unit Head, IT Systems Support at a security firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Its pricing model is good for what it offers. Nobody here gives me a hard time about renewing the contract every year. It might be a little cost prohibitive for a smaller company who has to stand up a virtual environment as well as have virtual environment licensing and the hardware. If you have a smaller environment, it might be cost prohibitive. If you only have a couple of hundred computers, you might be more willing to do those manually. In our environment, the cost savings of having KACE far outweigh the licensing costs. We are okay with its pricing model.
View full review »CH
ChrisHead
Director of IT at CCOF, INC
Licensing is very straightforward. They don't overcomplicate it. This is not a Cisco product where you have to have 30 different licenses just to open the box. It's pretty much set-and-forget. You pay an annual license. Licensing is based, in part, on number of seats, but they're very flexible and they're willing to work with you.
The cost is in the mid to upper range, but the ROI exceeds the outside cost, especially once you've had the system for a while. And that's all the more true since they now offer it as a cloud-based solution. You can either buy their cloud-based solution or you can host it on your own cloud solution, which is what we've chosen to do because we already own the license for it.
If you already own the license for it, it doesn't matter if you're using their old hardware or if you want to migrate your stuff up to the cloud—you own the license. If you want to migrate up to the cloud, they say, "Yeah, no problem. Here's a preconfigured image with all the software installed on it already. All you have to do is create the environment for it in Azure, move this in there and then move your backups, your data, from your old system to this one." Provided you don't mess yourself up like we did a few times, it just flows right in.
View full review »It is expensive in Brazil. Generally, it's considered expensive, especially compared to solutions like Spiceworks.
View full review »RJ
Raymond Joakimson
Computer Support Specialist at Truckee Meadows Community College
Don't scale up too quickly, because there was a period of time where we bought a bunch of licenses but we weren't using that many. When we finally needed more licenses, we lucked into a time when they had a discount on licenses, so we bought more at that time. So hold off for those times when the cost comes down a little bit.
View full review »TH
Tim Herrmann
Laboringenieur / Computeringenieur at HTW Berlin
We are a university. So, we have a very good price for the system. I think the price for the system is worth it because of the security patch management. The security patch management is very important for us. The price is very good for KACE SMA, the functionality you get, and the patch management.
The technical support you get from KACE is sometimes priceless. Sometimes, you don't need very much support. However, if you need support, it is good for me to know that there are people who have very good knowledge about the system. I am willing to pay for that.
View full review »JL
reviewer1506942
Security Systems Integrator at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
We need it, so we have to pay the price. It is what it is. If you need a gallon of milk, then you have to pay the price for it. You don't want to buy the cheap stuff. You want to buy the stuff that is organic and good for your body, which doesn't have all this other junk in it. You want it clean for your body. Quest has done that for our deployment and management systems.
View full review »SN
Shailesh Naidu
Sr. Systems Engineer at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
I don't have to deal with the pricing and it does get renewed automatically for us every time. But the pricing does get confusing for me. Our system is a little complicated because we have two appliances, one dealing with just the laptops and desktops, one dealing with only the servers.
View full review »CS
Christian Städtler
IT Manager at a educational organization with 201-500 employees
We buy consulting fees from Software Factory, then we pay extra for it.
View full review »RO
reviewer1512810
Enterprise Service Desk Systems Manager at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Licensing is done on a per device basis, so it's dependent on how many agents you've got installed. When we looked at it, KACE was competitively priced versus other agent-based asset and inventory management solutions.
Where we really get a lot of value is that the product licensing is only based on that. It means that if we implement another IT service, we can use it with no problem and it doesn't cost anything more to put that in there. We can just keep adding to it, so we're basically getting more use for no extra costs. An example is that we have other departments and other kinds of entities within our business, and they are utilizing the service desk functionality for things outside of plain IT support.
DC
reviewer1677819
Help Desk Technician at a hospitality company with 51-200 employees
In terms of pricing and licensing, my advice is that you need to assess what you need and then look at what they offer. It's easy to get caught up in the things that you want, but don't really need. You really want to assess what's best for your environment and to plan it very well.
Ideally, if there is a project manager available then they should help with the planning because you want your end goal to be in line with what you are trying to do. A reseller will try to sell you everything under the sun, so it's important that you plan well and know what is required in your environment.
View full review »TM
reviewer1711290
Network systems Administrator at Azura Credit Union
If your team is small like ours, I highly recommend working with an install vendor. For us, it wasn't as much a technically challenging thing to implement as much as what the vendor showed us during setup and installation that was just so helpful. With their help, we were able to hit the ground running and had much less of a learning curve.
View full review »CB
Carsten Buscher
IT Systems Administrator at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The pricing and licensing are absolutely fair.
As far as I know there are no other costs that come with using it. It's just the licenses for the KACE based on the number of computers. Our VMware servers already existed, so there were no other costs for us.
CV
reviewer1825494
IT Infrastructure Manager at a university with 501-1,000 employees
As with many platforms, the more you can put in, the better the solution will function. The time taken to deploy complex packages can be time-consuming, but this is outside of the KACE environment directly.
Licencing has been quite simple throughout. We have successfully expanded our support numerous times, including additional features and devices.
View full review »SC
reviewer1697724
Director, Information Technology IT User Services at a university with 501-1,000 employees
The cost is reasonable. I would definitely take the JumpStart training that is offered as it helps to get you started.
View full review »KB
Kevin Baldwin
PC Technician at Cape Fear Community College
It may be more expensive, but you get what you pay for.
View full review »
SW
Stephan Williams
Computer Support Specialist at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
The pricing is great. It's billed annually and it's very reasonable.
View full review »RG
reviewer2136339
ICT at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees
The product is reasonably priced.
View full review »MA
reviewer1508673
Systems Administrator at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
The pricing and licensing are good. It's worth it. It's a core software on our system. Every single person uses KACE. Even for asset management, we have KACE Endpoint Management on each one of our devices as well. People use the help desk and we use it to track and deploy things. It's integral.
There are no costs in addition to their standard licensing fees.
View full review »AB
reviewer1704495
Network Analyst at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
The cost of KACE has been relatively low compared to other systems. Even if those systems have the same cost, they do not do as much of the third-party patching that KACE natively does. With a cost of less than $4,500 a year, it's been very good.
The pricing model is fair and fine. I wouldn't change anything about that.
View full review »DL
Douglas Lima
Infrastructure Analyst at Ituran Brasil
The pricing is fair.
View full review »TW
Tim White
Sr. IT Support Technician at a transportation company with 201-500 employees
We pay annually for technical support.
View full review »It was a very attractive price. This is a huge feature of this product. If you would "credit score" this product versus others out there on the market, this one has a very attractive price.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Quest KACE Systems Management
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about Quest KACE Systems Management. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.