We did it all ourselves. We haven't outsourced. We have a company that we deal with that maintains our servers for us, but they don't have any TFS experience. We coordinated these changes through them, but we dictated the changes. So, they didn't provide us with any expertise.

We did it in-house. TFS is user-friendly. So we do not require much help to deploy. An administrator can implement it.

We used one person for the deployment of the solution.

We did use an integrator once or twice. Our experience with them was good. It was easier because we didn't have to worry about a lot of things. They took the burden of the effort, and we just had to give them information.

We deployed the solution in-house.

We deployed it using an in-house team. You will need two to three people who are in the DevOps teams, who do all the testing, and programmers, who use it and check the code.

There is some maintenance required from our team. For example, licensing and overall support. 

It was done in-house. It is pretty easy to come up with an installer. There is nothing difficult there.

The IT team deployed the solution. 

Not too many people are needed for the deployment, perhaps four or five. They consist primarily of engineers and there is one manager. 

During our implementation, we requested help directly from Microsoft.

Our in-house DevOps team is responsible for maintenance.

We had the help of consultants from Microsoft. The implementation was five years ago, so I can't recall too many details, however, I believe we were pleased with their work.

We did the implementation of the solution in-house using our own knowledge and we did some training courses in TFS.

Our IT team handles deployment and all maintenance-related issues.

We have an internal team that handled the implementation of this solution.

Our in-house IT department deployed it who are very experienced.

Installation can be done with the help of the technical team. We are talking about the same team, consisting of around four people and a single manager. 

We use one to two people for the implementation and support of the solution.

In-house.

In-house.

Our in-house technical people installed and deployed this solution. There were two of them involved in the process where one took care of the servers, VMs, and infrastructure, whereas the second person installed the solution and gave us the link to use it.

We have lots of servers and virtual machines, with two people in charge of maintaining our infrastructure. One person is generally in charge of installing and maintaining software as was with TFS, and this person is also responsible for the maintenance.

In-house. We have the required people to set up the product on our own, in some cases, it is better to call a vendor team.

We used a vendor team from Microsoft.

We did it in-house.

It was done as an in-house implementation.

We have one or two people who are responsible for maintenance.

We did it in-house.

We did it in-house.

We did it in-house.

We had a team doing the implementation, it was their first time and they did not have any problems. It took less than a week to do the full implementation. The amount of implementation personnel depends on the scope of the operation, but if you just want to get it up and running, then one person is enough.

We used an in-house team.