We performed a comparison between IBM B2B Integrator, Magic xpi Integration Platform, and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware."This solution allows for easy integration with heterogeneous applications."
"It's highly stable, and the redundancy is amazing. B2B Integrator also has a high availability option to work in a cluster environment. You rarely have issues operating it because of the HA."
"The solution is useful for transferring files from one format to another format. Also, the solution is useful in translation."
"The most valuable features assist with understanding data formats and transforming data."
"IBM B2B Integrator is a great tool, robust, reliable, low-maintenance, and ideal solution."
"B2B Integrator is multi-platform, so it can be integrated with Windows, Unix, or whatever, and it can work with almost all programming languages. It can also transfer a lot of data in a short time. For instance, a system I recently implemented exchanges about 20 million files a day."
"Very flexible product; it allows implementing different flows on the same infrastructure."
"It can scale horizontally as well as vertically as a cluster."
"The stability of the solution is OK."
"It can scale."
"The most valuable feature is their integrations and very good API management."
"The integration potential is excellent."
"The product’s ability to seamlessly translate protocols is great."
"The solution's deployment and proxy processes are very good."
"Overall, it is a pretty good product. It is also very scalable."
"Whenever we need some support in our local language, we get it easily. They also have an office in Germany and if a person is unable to contact them by phone, they can go to the office in person."
"Customers can make use of Runtime Fabric, an RTF environment."
"Map translator needs more enhancements."
"API integration could be improved. The legacy system could be on the cloud."
"The tool requires you to write a lot of code in Java and XSLT, which makes development tough."
"There are also some features in the solution that are not user-friendly, like code lists with no search options. So, we must navigate hundreds of pages to check for one entry."
"There should be a single place to do things, rather than making it complicated, not moving away and truncating the old features but instead coming up with the new and still keeping the old stuff confuses people sometimes."
"End-to-end visibility and monitoring application required. The control center is available and covers this area, but it still fails in many monitoring scenarios."
"When working on an elaborate rule, I end up creating it in notepad and then pasting it into the Extended Rule window, which is not convenient."
"The mapping, visibility, deployment, and the dashboard could be improved and updated. The communication logs are very poor. They are not easily understood, and we need to navigate to many places for many reasons. You can't just pull the information; it's very tough."
"It is not performing well."
"The pricing can be a little bit less."
"The compatibility with vendors can be improved. Microsoft Azure heavily uses single software."
"It doesn't work well when you try using it for the processing layer."
"The cost of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required, especially when compared to other tools, like Dell Boomi or Oracle."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is complex for beginners. Users without programming skills will find it complex. It should also improve its pricing."
"The solution's licensing methodologies could be improved."
"One area we'd like to see improvement in is the error logging and troubleshooting process."
"MuleSoft's release calendar is rather conventional with two major, two minor releases and hotfixes in between. The competition sometimes offer more rapid release cycles and provides improved and new functionality with a faster time-to-market."
Earn 20 points