We performed a comparison between Atlassian Confluence and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."There is a good library of templates for a wide range of needs."
"It is easy to use."
"The best feature is the automatic tagging of information in documents. The automatic algorithm highlights irrelevant information that conflict with the actual documents."
"We value the way we can tag documentation to Jira because we can cross-reference a Jira ticket to a Confluence page, and we can also add a Confluence page to a Jira ticket."
"The product has a valuable feature for quick verification of documents."
"What I like the most is the Wiki software that comes with Atlassian Confluence."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from its document-controlling feature. In Atlassian Confluence, controlled documents cannot be edited by anyone else."
"For me, the most valuable feature is its high performance. It's crucial for us in the bank, as we handle a massive number of transactions every day."
"We can now share to team members by MS Teams and assign planners to follow and update statuses in a single platform."
"The metadata services, the WCF service integration and the Voxel feature are three most valuable elements of this solution."
"No code and low code, scalable, and stable collaboration platform. Straightforward to set up. Its support system is good and offers fast issue resolution."
"It facilitates collaboration and the ability to create custom workflows."
"It has good integration with other MS products."
"The ability to have version control and co-editing is vital to our workflows."
"It has made us faster and more efficient."
"It improved transparency around work products."
"An area for improvement would be the intuitiveness of using the features, especially if you want to customize."
"There needs to be a flexible pricing model, where we can pick and choose services and customize our pricing model."
"Some elements of the user interface could be more user-friendly, including embedding diagrams."
"Managing user permissions and credentials could be easier."
"It lacks ease of integration."
"Confluence could incorporate stronger records management and automation features. The current management structure is too open, which becomes an issue."
"There could be an option to collaborate with other users while editing the documents."
"There is room for improvement in terms of pricing."
"Replication needs improvement."
"The limitations and boundaries must be extended."
"The product must provide more automation."
"One issue is that when users mistakenly hide files or set permissions incorrectly, it can lead to files becoming inaccessible, requiring intervention from Microsoft support to resolve."
"It does not integrate despite being part of the Microsoft family."
"The management of the product/back-end is complex."
"You still need a bit of expertise to add branding."
"The initial setup is complex and has room for improvement."
Atlassian Confluence is ranked 2nd in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) with 99 reviews while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) with 146 reviews. Atlassian Confluence is rated 8.2, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Atlassian Confluence writes "Good usability, helpful community support, and facilitates well-structured documentation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Atlassian Confluence is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Office 365, Microsoft OneDrive, Zendesk and Slack, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, Box and Hyland OnBase. See our Atlassian Confluence vs. SharePoint report.
See our list of best Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) vendors.
We monitor all Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.