Compare ForgeRock vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about ForgeRock vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
512,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable aspect of the product is that it is Microsoft-based and it supports all Microsoft technology.""Our customers have benefited from Omada Identity automating the certification process. Most of our customers were using manual methods for user access certification. With Omada Identity, you can automate almost all of it, which means that certification now becomes on demand. You don't have to wait for two or three months to execute a certification timeframe. Instead, you can do certifications as often as you want.""It has a lot of out-of-the-box features. It is flexible, and there are a lot of possibilities to configure and extend it. It is user-friendly. It has an interface that is end-user or business-user friendly.""When we started with identity and access management, we cleaned up and skipped 500 accounts. Therefore, there are a lot of people who are still in our system. Using this tool, we have cleaned up a lot of accounts for ourselves as well as our partners and suppliers. So, we can manage everything now.""The most valuable functionality of the solution for us is that when employees stop working for the municipality, they are automatically disabled in Active Directory. Omada controls that 100 percent. They are disabled for 30 days, and after that time Omada deletes the Active Directory account. The same type of thing happens when we employ a new person. Their information is automatically imported to Omada and they are equipped with the roles and rights so they can do their jobs."

More Omada Identity Pros »

"The solution's most valuable feature is the authentication for the consumers. The integration with other third-party applications is excellent.""The most valuable features are that it is easy to manage and it's stable.""We create and define the permissions and configurations for the users.""ForgeRock has CIAM, which other products didn't have, and they have DevOps ready.""Even though we have very small business interests with them today, they see that we plan on growing drastically over the next two years. Therefore, we have excellent support and we are now at a point where we are not calling tech support. We pick up a phone and call the Account Manager and they'll get everything resolved for us. We don't have to queue along with everybody else and go through a long process.""I like the intelligent authentication feature.""Their access management solution, OpenAM, is most valuable because it meets the needs of a lot of users.""The solution integrates well and it is important for them to keep up with the current trends in the market quickly enough, and they have been doing a good job at it."

More ForgeRock Pros »

"The most valuable feature is the security, in particular, the One Time Password support.""The governance aspect in general is great."

More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Pros »

Cons
"When the re-certification process is launched that makes Omada very slow. There are performance issues in the current version.""The Omada Identity SaaS version doesn't provide all the features Omada Identity on-premise provides.""Its flexibility is both a good thing and a bad thing. Because it is very flexible, it also becomes too complex. This is common for most of the products we evaluated. Its scalability should be better. It had a few scalability issues.""I would like to search on date fields, which is not possible now.""If you find an error and you need it fixed, you have to upgrade. It's not like they say, "Okay, we'll fix this problem for you." You have to upgrade. The last time we upgraded, because there was an error in a previous version, we had to pay 150,000 Danish Krone (about $24,000 at the time of this review) to upgrade our systems... That means that we have to pay to get errors fixed that Omada has made in programming the system. I hope they change this way of looking at things."

More Omada Identity Cons »

"The identity management model needs a bit of improvement.""They should improve the solution by include reporting.""I find that it's quite expensive for just an open-source system. Support is quite expensive.""Automatic Deployment needs improvement. it could be made easier.""We're worried about the scaling. We're told it will be okay and there won't be issues, however, I'm not 100% convinced.""It should have a better user interface. Its flexibility should also be improved. It is not about simplifying; it is more about flexibility. Each company has its own requirements, and ForgeRock can provide more flexibility in terms of the use of existing modules to implement features for the customers.""It should be a little bit easier to implement. It is user-friendly, but there is always scope for improvement.""The solution requires more simplified customization. However, part of the problem is my clients determining their own preferences. Technology can help and do many things, but you have to define your own policies to ensure that the solution or service works within those parameters. Helping customers understand their business and different processes is another issue not relating to the functionality of this solution."

More ForgeRock Cons »

"Technical support in Pakistan can be improved.""the user interface could be slightly improved."

More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The initial total cost of ownership to implement Omada Identity is not small. The TCO for the implementation is as high as any other solution. However, the cost of maintaining the solution is at par or lower than competitors, including adding more features or maintaining the system after the initial deployment or installation to make sure that they are available for users to use or extending the functionalities of those activities. Those maintenance costs are lower than other vendors, but the initial cost of getting the system installed is still high.""It is licensed per managed user per year.""There were a lot of administrator, partner, and supplier accounts for people who were no longer working for us but still in the system. So, we reduced the number of users no longer with the company, which saved us some money on licensing.""It's a fair price for the on-premises system. Compared with what we had before, it's much cheaper and we get all the modules in one. We tried to go with the cloud, but it was far too expensive."

More Omada Identity Pricing and Cost Advice »

"It's a bit pricey and could be more competitive.""We have multiple clients we are looking at right now. We are at a very small number, however, the idea and the goal is to grow. We are looking at about $100,000 and $50,000 a minimum a month cost. That'd be minimum maybe in a couple of years.""Its price is comparable to other products in the market.""Its licensing is on a yearly basis, but it also depends on the contract that you have with the vendor. They have multiple types of contracts. There are additional costs to the standard licensing fees. If you need some of the features, you have to pay more.""The license is purchased annually per user. However, you can negotiate if you are signing for a longer period of time. When comparing this solution to others on the market it is priced fair, it is not at the top of the price range or at the bottom end."

More ForgeRock Pricing and Cost Advice »

"There are many more expensive products on the market, so the pricing is good"

More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Management (IM) solutions are best for your needs.
512,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It has a lot of out-of-the-box features. It is flexible, and there are a lot of possibilities to configure and extend… more »
Top Answer: Its flexibility is both a good thing and a bad thing. Because it is very flexible, it also becomes too complex. This is… more »
Top Answer: Their access management solution, OpenAM, is most valuable because it meets the needs of a lot of users.
Top Answer: Its licensing is on a yearly basis, but it also depends on the contract that you have with the vendor. They have… more »
Top Answer: It should be a little bit easier to implement. It is user-friendly, but there is always scope for improvement.
Top Answer: This solution lacks a closed-loop, which causes issues. If on one day (by a single user) multiple requests as submitted… more »
Top Answer: We use this solution to automate lifecycle governance and for role-based access control administration. Within our… more »
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Omada Identity Suite
ForgeRock Identity Platform, ForgeRock OpenIDM
SecurID
Learn More
Omada
Video Not Available
Overview

Omada Identity delivers an end-to-end identity and access management solution with essential identity governance functionality for secure, compliant, and efficient administration of all users' access rights across on-premises or cloud-based systems. The solution provides configurable best practice processes that covers all identity and access related scenarios from providing an access risk overview, management of identities lifecycle, to automated enforcement of policies.

Open source provisioning solution for real-time user management life cycle automation.
RSA SecurID provides world-leading two-factor authentication, protecting 25,000 organizations and 55 million users. RSA SecurID extends security to bring your own device (BYOD), cloud, and mobile as well as traditional virtual private network (VPN) and web portals. RSA SecurID solutions comprise three primary components: authenticator, platform, and agents.
Offer
Learn more about Omada Identity
Learn more about ForgeRock
Learn more about RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle
Sample Customers
Bayer, ECCO Shoes, Vattenfall, NuStar Energy, Unicredit, Schiphol Group
Geico, Thomson Reuters, Salesforce, McKesson, Trinet, SKY, BNP Paribas, Deloitte, Capgemini, North Western University
NTT Com Asia, Virgin Blue, Bank of Uganda, EMEA Telecommunications Company, LAit (Lazio Innovazione Tecnologica), NyNet, OTP Bank, Red Bull Racing, Rupert House School, Signify, UK Local Authority, Bancolombia, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (BPPR), TIVIT, Array Services, International Computerware, KPMG LLP, Moffitt Cancer Center
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm9%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm9%
Government6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider20%
Financial Services Firm9%
Insurance Company5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business25%
Large Enterprise75%
REVIEWERS
Small Business38%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise46%
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise43%
Find out what your peers are saying about ForgeRock vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
512,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.

ForgeRock is ranked 2nd in Identity Management (IM) with 8 reviews while RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is ranked 12th in Identity Management (IM) with 2 reviews. ForgeRock is rated 7.6, while RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of ForgeRock writes "Good for multi-client setups and easy to implement but the scalability seems uncertain". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle writes "A reliable solution with some technical flaws that need to be addressed". ForgeRock is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, Azure Active Directory, Okta Workforce Identity, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and OpenIAM Identity Governance, whereas RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), One Identity Manager, Oracle Identity Governance and Microsoft Identity Manager. See our ForgeRock vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle report.

See our list of best Identity Management (IM) vendors.

We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.