We performed a comparison between MHR iTrent and Oracle HCM Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Workday, Oracle, SAP and others in Benefits Administration."MHR iTrent's functionality and the payroll part are good."
"Robust and very dependable."
"The most valuable feature is the support for mobile devices."
"Since it is an integrated solution, it brings speed and efficiency to the business process."
"The most valuable feature is fast reporting."
"We haven't had a single issue with stability, and we've been using it for more than three years."
"The solution is very good at building out a roadmap based on client needs and feedback."
"In general, functionality is fine."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle HCM Cloud is its integration."
"Customer support and getting help from MHR iTrent are not great at all."
"The data uploading part and backup could be better. They are a bit complex. Oracle is continuously changing it from one functionality to another. It's a bit unstable right now, and it's basically on the backend data upload part. If I have to upload, for example, data for 100 employees, it's a bit of a challenge for an end-user. It can be difficult if you're not a technical person and an end-user like me. I administer the platform, and if I get a request to upload and I'm not a technical person, then I'm just lost. I have to do some research and then complete the task. But it's evolving, and I hope it's more user-friendly in the future. In the next release, I would like a more stable mobile application. The current version isn't very stable. It takes time to open, and although they have come up with new UI pages, a few open areas need to be addressed. I would also like to see more robust and user-friendly data uploading techniques that would be helpful for end users like us. We don't have a technical background, and we just want to upload the data for our day-to-day operations."
"The product needs to keep improving the integration tools and the tools to load the data - that whole mechanism - in order to allow for flexibility in the configuration."
"The initial setup is straightforward. However, it is more complex than Oracle Taleo because it has a lot more features have complexity."
"I believe what could be improved is the EX portion of Oracle HCM Cloud and how it can more easily integrate with other tools."
"Product integration, particularly with collaboration tools, is lacking in this solution."
"The interface could be more user friendly."
"Although the performance management is good, it could be improved as its functionality is quite basic."
"It's not so easy to customize as it's cloud-based."
MHR iTrent is ranked 17th in Benefits Administration with 1 review while Oracle HCM Cloud is ranked 2nd in Benefits Administration with 62 reviews. MHR iTrent is rated 6.0, while Oracle HCM Cloud is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of MHR iTrent writes "A scalable solution with good functionalities, but customer support needs to improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle HCM Cloud writes " Capable of consolidating data from all countries and providing access to any employee information across locations but poor user experience". MHR iTrent is most compared with SAP HCM, Workday, Access PeopleXD and SAP SuccessFactors, whereas Oracle HCM Cloud is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, PeopleSoft, Workday, SAP HCM and Cornerstone HR Suite.
See our list of best Benefits Administration vendors and best Cloud HCM vendors.
We monitor all Benefits Administration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
