We performed a comparison between One Identity Manager and Oracle Identity Governance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two User Provisioning Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"Omada Identity Suite has a very powerful workflow engine. It is used for requesting access for approval to everything that's around Access Management and for re-certification purposes."
"Omada offers a technical solution that addresses both our needs."
"User-friendly solution."
"Omada's user interface is elegant and easy to work with. I like Omada's ability to automatically generate accounts for new hires and allow them access to all required systems by established policies. Around 80 percent of workers can start working immediately on their first day without requesting further access."
"The customer success and support teams have been crucial."
"The most valuable functionality of the solution for us is that when employees stop working for the municipality, they are automatically disabled in Active Directory. Omada controls that 100 percent. They are disabled for 30 days, and after that time Omada deletes the Active Directory account. The same type of thing happens when we employ a new person. Their information is automatically imported to Omada and they are equipped with the roles and rights so they can do their jobs."
"Its best feature is definitely the process design. It is quite easy and straightforward to design a process."
"We used to have a problem where an employee's access wasn't terminated when they left the company. Now, we have much better visibility into and control over who has access."
"The solution offers good integration with other environments such as SAP and Active Directory, et cetera."
"The product helps minimize gaps in governance coverage."
"The most valuable features of this solution are its handling and that it is easy to maintain and manage the data."
"The most valuable feature of One Identity Manager is its object-oriented architecture."
"Quest One IDM allows for large customization."
"I rate One Identity nine out of 10 for stability. We haven't seen any downtime. It has worked smoothly since it went into production."
"For me, personally, the automation is the most valuable feature. I don't have to do things manually, like creating user accounts and provisioning them to the target systems."
"In terms of what I found most valuable in One Identity Manager, it's the only product where the workflow and the catalog can be configured on roles or by business people. You don't need to know the technology at all to configure that, so this is the product's biggest advantage as well as its strongest feature. One Identity Manager is also business-oriented and IAM administrator-oriented."
"It has a very good response time."
"The most valuable feature is the set of out-of-the-box connectors."
"The most valuable feature is the flexible automation functionality which has optimized our user access privilege management. This has allowed us to create and delete user accounts more accurately and efficiently. This feature has enabled us to save time and resources needed to perform mundane manual tasks."
"I am able to request any access rights I need."
"This solution has improved the organization in several ways, including saving many help-desk password-reset calls, IT staff productivity, and quicker user on-boarding."
"Password management is a valuable feature."
"It helps provision the required accesses through policies, approvals, and whatever would be the business requirement."
"The proactive controls which can be configured to a granular level allowing the organization the flexibility to meet the changing demands of the workforce."
"The reporting and importing have room for improvement."
"If I had to name one thing, it would be the user interface (UI)."
"Improved traceability would be helpful for administrators. For example, let's say a user's permission is being revoked. We can only see the system that has carried out a particular action but not what triggered it. If an event definition or something has changed in the criteria for the permission being removed or something like that, we don't have immediate access to that information. It takes a little detective work."
"Omada's performance could be better because we had some latency issues. Still, it's difficult to say how much of that is due to Omada versus the resources used by our other vendors in our on-prem environment. Considering the resources we have invested into making it run well, it's slightly slower than we would expect."
"In our organization, all the data is event-driven, which means that if an attribute is changed in the source system, it can be updated within a few seconds in all end-user systems. There is room for improvement in Omada regarding that. Omada is still batch-based for some processes, so sometimes it can take an hour or even four hours before the execution is run and the update is sent."
"I would like more training. As someone who is new to this world, I don't feel that the courses Omada provides are good enough. They should also improve the documentation. It is difficult to learn how to use the solution by yourself"
"Omada Identity has a steep learning curve."
"Functionality and usability could be improved."
"In the update processes for hotfixes need improvement."
"One Identity Manager needs to come up with many more out-of-the-box connectors, similar to Workday and ServiceNow."
"I would like some access management features to be added. We have some customers with a small need to do authentication as a service, and there are other solutions on the market which offer this."
"The initial set up was quite complex. It takes quite some time to get use to this product because of its complexity."
"The web interface has room for improvement. It could be more performant and the design of the web interface is relatively complicated. It could be simplified."
"The performance could be better. I also think One Identity could improve its documentation for developers. Many of One Identity's features aren't fully documented. We don't have enough information on how to use them."
"The interface can be a bit complex for an administrator to manage."
"The performance could use improvement. Sometimes synchronizations take too long."
"The platform could be enhanced with additional features."
"One of the areas that need some improvement with Oracle specifically is the ease of implementation."
"The cost of this product needs to be reduced."
"This product currently uses a complex and old implementation. They need a single, user-friendly console for easy configuration. The Active Directory Services (ADS) integration needs improvement. They should offer non-Java coding options and simplify mapping."
"The development and the administration side could be a lot more intuitive and easier to use than it currently is, in terms of functionality and what it tries to achieve as a Single Sign-On entity for an enterprise environment."
"I would like to see automation in the solution. We need also integration with the Identity Manager. The solution needs to improve in the application integrations part. It also needs to focus on application deployment as well."
"Simplify & add more functionality to Identity Cloud Service (IDCS)."
"You need full visibility because the suite of features are complex and you have to be clear on what you want to implement."
One Identity Manager is ranked 2nd in User Provisioning Software with 74 reviews while Oracle Identity Governance is ranked 4th in User Provisioning Software with 66 reviews. One Identity Manager is rated 8.0, while Oracle Identity Governance is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of One Identity Manager writes "The JML is customizable but the support team isn't strong". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Identity Governance writes "A scalable solution designed to meet the requirements of medium and large-sized companies". One Identity Manager is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, EVOLVEUM midPoint, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), ForgeRock and Saviynt, whereas Oracle Identity Governance is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Saviynt, Microsoft Identity Manager and ForgeRock. See our One Identity Manager vs. Oracle Identity Governance report.
See our list of best User Provisioning Software vendors and best Identity Management (IM) vendors.
We monitor all User Provisioning Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
