CrossBrowserTesting Primary Use Case

Maggie Jones
QA Automation Engineer and Web Developer at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
I use CrossBrowserTesting to run Selenium tests in the cloud. I have created a custom QA automation tool for my company and integrated it with CrossBrowserTesting via the Selenium API. I send the commands to CrossBrowserTesting over the API and my tests get executed in the desired browsers/OS combinations. I also use the CrossBrowserTesting Selenium API to retrieve a full list of all browser/OS combos so my QA automation interface can allow users to choose what browsers they want to test. In addition, our entire front-end team uses the CrossBrowserTesting live testing feature to investigate browser issues and do manual QA testing. View full review »
Michael Hutchison
Web Specialist at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
When developing new pages that have questionable functionality or coding, we will often use CBT to test it in a variety of browsers and devices. CBT works with our testing environment and development site. Our greatest concern is universal appearance and functionality, thus we test a great many browsers. View full review »
marketacumen
President at a tech consulting company with 1-10 employees
Primary use case is to run an online analytics company which requires JavaScript compatibility across all browsers. We use this tool to test and deploy release updates whenever changes are made. Also, they have a Selenium portal which is useful for doing browser testing for our administrative interface and automated user testing. Finally, they have the ability to launch live browser environments. This is invaluable in diagnosing customer issues and replicating problems within specific browsers. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about SmartBear, BrowserStack, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: November 2019.
382,547 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1072422
User
Our primary use case is testing our application on various tablet/mobile devices. It is nice to have all of the devices you need in one place. View full review »
Dylan Goldade
QA Analyst / Software QC at Quartzy, Inc
Where I work as a QA analyst, we have developed a web app to help life scientists organize their labs and order lab supplies from a variety of manufacturers at low prices. My primary use case of CrossBrowserTesting is to ensure new features that we have launched, or are about to launch, look correct and work as expected on all the most common browsers across the most common OSs. View full review »
reviewer874593
Software Quality Assurance Engineer
Our primary use cases for this solution are: * Feature validation of our product on multiple OS/mobile/browser combinations * To expose platform-specific issues early in the testing life cycle * To find usability issues and differences between desktop versus mobile versus tablets View full review »
reviewer1007001
User
We develop web and mobile applications and need to test our applications across different browsers and different devices across all operating systems. View full review »
Shatskiy Kirill
Javascript Developer at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
We have a bunch of JavaScript libraries which are used on thousands of websites for showing advertisements. When I had just joined the company, there were no tests at all and the deploying process was very unpredictable. Therefore, we decided to cover the libraries by unit and integration tests. View full review »
Ezz El Din El Defrawi
Test Automation Consultant at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
My primary use for this product revolves around simulating various mobile and tablet responses to company web apps on an internal FT environment. View full review »
reviewer1026108
User
Use of CBT to test the UI in different mobile devices since the experience is different with a real device vs. resizing window browser. Also, it's very useful to test the UI in Internet Explorer. View full review »
Mahebo
Founder - Creative Director at a media company with 1-10 employees
We work in the web design/development sector. It is really important for us to bring the total warranty of sites to 100% mobile responsive. It is really difficult, but with CrossBrowserTesting, we can do all the testing that we need to do with it. View full review »
hima
User at a logistics company with 1,001-5,000 employees
A wide variety of browser testing for most of my company's internal and frequently used websites. View full review »
reviewer1041558
User
I used CrossBrowserTesting for testing on different browsers on desktop and phone environments with different browser versions for our sites. View full review »
Patrick Rittenhouse
Senior Front-End Developer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
We primarily use CrossBrowserTesting to troubleshoot front-end issues in various browsers and devices. View full review »
Matt Juszczak
Chief Technology Officer at a tech services company
Manual and automated (Selenium) continuous testing of development and production websites to protect against broken code deployments. View full review »
Kiran Gurunath
Software QA Tester at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
We are using this feature to run our application in all the updated browsers popularly used. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about SmartBear, BrowserStack, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: November 2019.
382,547 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Sign Up with Email