Oracle BPM doesn't seem that scalable, but because I'm using the on-premise version, I don't face that much challenge in terms of scalability.

The scalability of the platform is exceptional. If you have the financial resources to invest in it, I highly recommend it, as its performance is outstanding. When I implemented it for the government, the user base exceeded four hundred.

It's quite scalable, I would rate it an eight out of ten for scalability. Being an enterprise solution, it caters well to customers, including those with larger operations. The scalability capabilities are good.

It caters to all. Small enterprises may find the pricing a bit challenging, but for medium and large enterprises, it shouldn't be an issue. Price might still be a consideration, but it's a strong feature for medium and large businesses.

For enterprises, especially considering the global pricing structure and financial performance of institutions, except for banks, it tends to be higher.

I am unsure about scalability because we don't have much experience with it. We have two admins using the product in our company and about 250 users. We only needed two employees for deployment and maintenance.

I rate the solution’s scalability an eight out of ten. My client is an enterprise business.

I would rate the scalability as 4.5 out of 5.

The scalability is good. Based on the demand, it can increase the CPU memory. It depends on the deployment. If it's on-premises, then you can add more virtual machines into your cluster. If you're deploying it on cloud, you can implement autoscaling.

We extend its own CPU base so we can scale it horizontally, as far as I know. Therefore, we do not have any major throwbacks in terms of scalability. It is doing okay.

We have more than 800 distinct applications in our IT landscape. So far, we have not have any problems with Oracle. We had enough scalability and okay development cycles, and it has been enough to cover our backup operations and order management systems.

I rate the tool’s scalability a nine out of ten.

Oracle BPM's runtime architecture scales quite well. Each Oracle BPM project is deployed as a composite EAR file that runs in a compiled manner. The environment can be clustered.

Oracle BPM is scalable. 

In our organization, there are 200 users of this solution. 

We had around 300 - 400 direct users using this solution. We required around five people to support the product. 

We are only using this solution for development, so we do not have many users. However, I know about some of our customers, and one of them has approximately two thousand users. At peak times, there are approximately one thousand concurrent users.

Sometimes a user will have thirty instances, which means that during the peak, there may be thirty thousand instances active in the engine. This level of scalability, however, requires a solid implementation by a team with a lot of experience.

The scalability of this solution depends on your architecture. The processor management system is quite fast and scalable. We have 10 developers using this solution and it supports 25,000 users.

It is a scalable solution. I think that new versions of Oracle BPM that work in the cloud-native environment, but our version is not cloud-native. It's not a containerized environment.

No.

Scalability is okay, but it depends on the configuration of the setup. We have customers that have users on the system that range from 10-20 users all the way up to 200-300 users.

No. We have customers generating more than 150,000 processes per day without performance issues.

Not applicable.