It's stable.

Occasionally, I've faced challenges with applications going down, but these incidents don't usually result in disconnections. 

If I were to rate its stability on a scale of one to ten, with ten being the most stable, I would place it around a seven, I suppose.

Since we have global reach, we are seeing a bit more instability in Asia, primarily in China, but I'm not sure that it's related to Zscaler. I think it's more due to how China does things in terms of internet access.

It's not very stable, but I think Zscaler is trying to improve that. This solution is typically deployed in endpoint environments like Windows, Linux, and even WSL, which is the Windows encapsulated version of Linux.

The solution is very stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

The product's stability is fine. 

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine and a half out of ten.

I rate the solution’s stability an eight out of ten.

The stability overall in the developed regions, such as the US and Europe, is fairly good. In certain regions, such as South Africa, Zscaler has not been stable for some time.

Its stability is first-class. We haven't had any issues during the time that we have been using it.

I find Zscaler to be very stable.

We haven't had any issues with stability.

No maintenance is required.

The stability is good. The solution is reliable. We've had no issues with stability. I'd rate the stability eight out of ten.

The solution is not perfect and things can go wrong but it is stable. In the last two years that I've been working with it, we did experience a small outage for a group of customers in a particular region for a few hours. Those customers all received service credits for the outage and it was fixed quickly. I give the stability a nine out of ten.

Zscaler Internet Access is stable.

My clients have never really called to tell me that stability has been an issue. Feedback has always been positive. 

It's quite stable and offers good performance. There are no bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze. It is reliable.

We have had no concerns with the solution's stability so far.

Zscaler is scalable. 

Zscaler Internet Access is stable. Since we have been using it we have not had any problems. 

The product is stable. 

Zscaler Internet Access is quite stable.

It's very stable. We haven't had any issues so far.

The solution is stable and secure. We haven't had any issues. The product is great.

It is a stable solution. I never faced any kind of downtime for my critical services. They have a higher availability. If one of the locations goes down, automatically, it'll scale to a preferred location.

I would rate the stability an eight out of ten. 

Stability is good. We have a presence around the globe, it's very localized and that minimizes any kind of latency. Even though they still complain about it.

Zscaler Internet Access is highly stable.

At a platform level, it's very stable.

This is a stable solution. It's a cloud service so we've never faced any outages. The availability has always been 100% for the past one and a half years. I don't think we've had any incidents with any of our data centers. Even if they do have a problem with a data center, they usually switch to the nearest region.

Zscaler Internet Access's stability is pretty good, and when an issue occurs, they're very quick to notify the end-users and fix it.

Aside from issues I've had accessing time management from time to time, it seems to be a stable solution.

I do not have a problem with the stability of the product.

I rate the tool's stability an eight out of ten.

It is a stable solution, although once or twice, we had issues with latency and slowness. Other than on these occasions, it has been fine.

Its stability is reasonable. We've had a couple of outages, but overall, it has been okay.

The solution is stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable.

The product is mature. I can't say it's not stable. It's been there for a while now and it proves that it can do the job according to what they say they do. I cannot say that they are not doing the best of what they think they should do. So at this point, they have a mature product and are working quite okay.

We haven't had any issues or any complaints from the customer in regards to the stability of the solution. Usually, the stability depends on the end-user as well, for example, how much usage or how much they know about the technology or the product. 

We've never experienced any outages or other problems since we started using this solution, so I believe it is very stable and secure. 

The solution is scalable. Right now, the company has 40,000 users. The client intends to increase usage.

Initially there were issues interms of stability and improved a lot now.

When you have appliances, SSL inspection is always a headache due to poor performance and/or lack of ciphers implemented. 

Since you need to maintain it the maintenance payout is not that good. I cannot say that it's stable.