We use this solution for managing the workflow of our development process.

We have about 150 users. The solution is deployed on-prem.

Our primary use case is for customer onboarding, finance, assets, and banking. The users for this solution have a variety of roles from finance to HR.

I was involved in the selection process for a tool for automation of all of our business processes. We selected Newgen. Since then, it has been in operation, and our project and application teams are using it.

We also have an RPA team in place, and we are also getting lots of bots to automate the business process. So, there is a conflict in the sense of when to use Newgen and when to use RPA. Based on the business requirement, nature, and analysis of the project, the teams are deciding when to use Newgen and when to use RPA.

This solution is deployed on-premises as well as on the customers' cloud environment. Its primary use depends on the business requirement. Newgen will structure the system based on all the requirements of the business. For example, we work in the finance domain and it helps with the banking process.

We currently have a project for which we are implementing this solution.

We are implementing this solution in a corporate banking environment, and we want to disperse our workflows. This includes the loan origination workflow, as well as the customer service workflow.

We have completed the requirements stages, and now we are on to prototyping.

Our deployment model is on-premises.

We had the cause of a recording problem with the application crashing. You need to see a crash. The product needs a great Newgen Rounds application.

You also need to be carrying costs, which is time wasted on non-productive requirements. You need to pay them by usage three ways.