Red Hat Fuse Previous Solutions

Erik Lewenhaupt
Solution Architect at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Previously we used Cicerone integration, and as hardware it is old. It is not as widely known or used and it was quite expensive. The main reason for management was that they weren't particularly clean and it was more costly. Both internally and in sales, the cost was too high, which was a big part of our total cost considerations. The reason we chose RedHat Fuse is that it was a combination of technical bracket and for economic reasons. View full review »
Solution Architect at AppValue
I have tried other options, but only for short periods of time. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, MuleSoft, WSO2 and others in ESB. Updated: May 2020.
419,052 professionals have used our research since 2012.