2021-07-27T09:36:00Z

What are pros and cons of Red Hat Fuse vs webMethods Integration Server?

21

Hi, I'm working at a consulting company and I want to understand the pros and the cons of Red Hat Fuse vs webMethods Integration Server.

Please advise. 

ITCS user
Guest
11 Answer

author avatar
Top 10Real User

With webMethods Integration Server, you have the power to connect anything faster, thanks to open, standards-based integration. Make custom, packaged and mainframe applications and databases—on-premises and in the cloud—interoperable and assure the fluid flow of data across your automated processes. Mapping and transformation functions are built-in.


pro's; Easy scalability, 300+ connectors, Faster integrations, "Lift & shift" integrations, Mapping and transformation & iPaaS integrations in the cloud


Where Red Hat Fuse, pros; Hybrid deployment, Built-in iPaaS with low-code UI/UX, Container-based integration & Integration everywhere supporting 200 included connectors.


Red Hat Fuse, based on open source communities like Apache Camel and Apache ActiveMQ, is part of an agile integration solution. Its distributed approach allows teams to deploy integrated services where required. The API-centric, container-based architecture decouples services so they can be created, extended, and deployed independently.

2021-07-29T11:05:22Z
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat Fuse vs. webMethods Integration Server and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
536,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.