Appian Reviews, Competitors and Pricing

Team leader at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

Mar 11, 2018

It reduces development time in half making us more efficient

Pros and Cons

"It reduces development time in half making us more efficient."
"There is no need to worry about vulnerabilities in the system, because Appian built a secure system."

"It would be nice if you could create your own customized apps when the business needed them."
"Appian is easy to set up, but JBoss is complex. JBoss is the application server for running Appian."

It reduces development time in half making us more efficient.

All enterprises focus on these features in their work.

It would be nice if you could create your own customized apps when the business needed them.

Three to five years.

Learn what your peers think about Appian. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2024.

769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

No issues.

No issues.

I would rate technical support as an eight out of 10.

I previously used .NET Framework. I switched because I think Appian is better for enterprise.

Appian is easy to set up, but JBoss is complex. JBoss is the application server for running Appian.

There are two solutions depending on your situation: an on-premise solution and a cloud solution.

Oracle BPM. Appian was better.

It is more efficient and reduces time. There is no need to worry about vulnerabilities in the system, because Appian built a secure system.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.