It's highly scalable, but there is some cost involved. If you need one gig throughput, you don't need to procure another offer. You just need to purchase the throughput license, and you can increase the throughput. These are very costly licenses. 

I would rate the scalability as eight out of ten. 

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a seven or eight out of ten.

My company mostly deals with small-sized businesses that use the solution.

Scalability is limited for Cisco Routers. Interface scalability has additional slots to plug the card in and increased the required interfaces and required media, like fiber or copper band. The performance of the router is limited. Cisco Router is a hardware platform with IOS, which is limited for every hardware-based plan. However, whatever limitations there have been, we have not felt any bottlenecks.

The challenge is when the customer wants to have a complete technology change, for example, IP VPN to SD-WAN, they will need to also have a hardware refresh and replace all of the hardware.  

The solution can scale, however, it is complicated. there are so many different series to choose from. 

I'd rate the ability to scale nine out of ten.

The solution isn't too scalable. It's not modular. You have to size everything correctly.

A lot of people are using the solution. We use it throughout the city. 

The company itself has about 1000 employees. However, we also have a compound that includes villas and apartments. We are delivering various services using Cisco infrastructure.

Cisco Enterprise Routers are quite scalable.

We are leveraging IP everywhere. There is no issue. We can stock up on LAN cards.

Of course, we cannot upgrade the main engine; that requires a product upgrade, which we are considering beginning next quarter.

It's a fairly large company, with around 1,000 people directly benefiting from it. That's just the headquarters; when you factor in the regions and other offices, the total number of people is around 5,000.

It is widely used because it has become our backbone for all IT. We have centrally deployed all of our databases, mail servers, and other systems. It's essentially a continuous deployment architecture.

There are different sizes for the routers. You need to get the right sizing base don your needs. 

The solution is scalable. You can have one router per premises and multiple branches and it will work well in an enterprise any size.

They have data sheets online that are easy to access so that you can see the capacity of various routers. You just need to choose the right one for your business.

The scalability is good. I would rate it around eight out of ten. 

We have ten people who use it directly right now. 

The router I am using right now is enough for my needs. There are many features that I would like to use, and I am learning about them. The tool is sufficient for me at present.

The router is the main device in my company. So, everyone who wants to access the internet will go through it. However, I am the only one with access to the router and its features. Thus, all other people have to access the internet through the router as a user without access to its features, and they may not even be aware of the process. They only have access to the internet without the knowledge of how it works. Since I am in the IT section, I have access to all the necessary details.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Around 110 people, consisting mostly of members of my company's IT team and network administrators, use the solution in my company.

The solution's scalability depends on the type of device.

Cisco Routers are very scalable.

It is very scalable. We have two sites, our head office site and our factory site. We have a total of about 1600 users on the factory site. We only require four to five people for maintenance, and the maintenance has different levels, admin, physical and support maintenance. There are three people in admin maintenance and three to four in support and other maintenance.

It's a scalable product. We have a total of 5,000 employees in our company that we use Cisco Enterprise Routers for.

The scalability of Cisco Enterprise Routers is good.

We have approximately 250,000 users using this solution in my organization. We have an additional 10,000-20,000 contractors and a couple of partners who use the solution.

There are no issues with scalability. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten. 

Cisco Enterprise Routers are highly scalable. We can upgrade to a higher appliance depending on our needs and bandwidth. 

The solution is extremely scalable. It’s not a problem expanding it as necessary.

We have the need to upgrade and plan to do so at the requisite time. 

It's scalable.

We have a team of ten with the main configuration.

I rate the solution’s scalability an eight out of ten.

We have found this to be a scalable solution.

I only handled installations but the solution must be scalable because it was deployed across all government offices. 

We are very limited in terms of scalability. We're a small firm, we hardly have 30 people. 

Our entire company uses it. We're all on the network. We have 152 users right now and we support about another 135 mobile devices. They're all financial institutions. 

The product is easy to scale. We have enterprise customers for the product. 

The solution is scalable.

The product is very scalable.

This solution is scalable as we can fulfill our requirements by adding modules.

Cisco Enterprise Routers is a scalable product.

We have more than 500 users in our company. We have a team of 50 IT technicians in our company and 5,000 employees that are distributed in approximately 70 locations in the country. Each location has Cisco Enterprise Routers on its premises.

The scalability of this solution is good.

These routers support a user base of about seven hundred and fifty people. We do not immediately plan on increasing our usage, although as the economy grows, we can see increasing our user base to perhaps one thousand users in two years. It will increase as we open more branch offices.

It is scalable. I'd rate the scalability eight out of ten. 

The solution is scalable. It's easy to expand. 

We have a variety of clients using the solution. 

We have not had a problem with the stability of Cisco Enterprise Routers.

Cisco Enterprise Routers is scalable, but their legacy routers aren't that scalable. However, they have been serving us pretty well over the years. We have about 4,000 users at the moment.

This is a scalable product.

The solution is very scalable. It's another feature that's great. You can add as many Cisco devices as you want to your project or your scenario if your initial design is correct. This can be done without any side effects and without any big changes.

We haven't attempted to scale the solution, so I can't really speak to if it's easy or difficult.

We have approximately 400 users in our organization.

We have a team of 20 to maintain this solution.

It's a scalable product. We have 12 users in five locations.

It is scalable. If we are adding a network and then a branch, that is just with a press of a button but increasing internally isn't so easy. Physical scalability is easier. For example, I have a client who has funding from Nairobi then to Mombasa and they want a branch office.

In terms of the users, I have ten plants that are using this. 

Cisco Enterprise Routers are scalable. It's good. We have an average number of users at our organization, about 100.

Cisco Routers are scalable enough for our needs. We only have a couple of networks we need to connect and 200 customers.

We have found Cisco Enterprise Routers to be scalable.

I have currently four customers using Cisco Enterprise Routers.

We have no issues with the scalability. We have approximately 500 users in our organization.

It's highly scalable. There should always be provision for scalability, as we procure many routers with modular capability. For example, we know that modular routers are capable of extension via WAN interfaces and other interfaces.

The solution is very scalable. In our company, we have about 10,000 users. We don't plan to increase usage right now.

While scalability is available, this option costs money. 

It is a scalable solution.

It's a scalable solution. We have 3,000 users in our organization.

The scalability is very good. I have not had any issues with it.

I have found Cisco Enterprise Routers to be scalable.

We have approximately 300 clients using this solution.

This is a scalable product that makes up part of our infrastructure, which services approximately 200 people.

Cisco Routers are scalable. We have approximately 1500 users in our company. Four are engineers that perform maintenance.

This solution is scalable but it does need some improvements.

There are no limitations to the number of users it can have, but it depends on the equipment and the network size. One local router could serve maybe five hundred to one thousand customers, whereas a larger network can accommodate more, so the number of users depends on the equipment and the technical parameters.

I rate the solution's scalability a nine out of ten.

Cisco Enterprise Routers is highly scalable.

We are payment gateway company that tracks accepting transactions and all the traffic coming from our partners or people outside that want to do a transaction, such as online or ATM on POS, are using the Cisco Enterprise Router. Additionally, the internal staff of 50 are using it.

We do not have plans to increase usage at this time.

In the current device, the scalability is not so good. There are no SD-WAN features in Enterprise Routers. In Nepal, there are normal VPN and normal routing protocols and not many features in SD-WAN.

I would rate the scalability as a three out of five.

Whether the solution scales well depends on the client and the model they've chosen to work with. Some customers have certain requirements and will need to work with certain models in order to get the scalability they desire.

We usually do some analysis and we only provide recommendations based on future goals or future requirements, instead of anything else. That way, we're prepared for an expansion.

We typically support small or medium companies. We don't typically deal with enterprise-level organizations. If we do deal with enterprises, it is only for support and not for implementation.

The scalability is okay.

Cisco Enterprise Routers' scalability is very good.

In India, 50% of the customers are using Cisco and the other 50% are using other products.

We plan to continue selling Cisco Routers, as it's a never-ending demand from our customers.

The scalability has been ok until now.

The solution is very scalable.

The solution is scalable.

We have approximately 700 people using this solution in my organization.

Scalability is ok.

It dependent of the scenario and technical use and needs.

Cisco routers are scalable.

I have found it to be scalable with our three million users.

It's a scalable solution.

The solution is scalable.

We have approximately 300 users using the Cisco Enterprise Routers.

This solution is scalable.

The solution is scalable. 

No scalability issues.

This is a scalable product and we have a couple of hundred users.

Around 70 people are currently using the products. There are two administrative or technical employees dedicated to maintenance. The scalability seems limited by performance.

The scalability of this solution is good.

We have customers with between thirty and fifty users and we have other customers who have between one hundred and one hundred and fifty users.

Cisco Enterprise Routers are scalable, but it can be challenging to integrate with some other devices. 

These routers are scalable and you can have many of them included in the network. One of our customers has approximately 100 users.

This is a scalable product.

The scalability is good. It is durable, and quite good.