IBM WebSphere Message Broker Room for Improvement

AbdelMonem Azaz
Integration Architect/Practice Manager at Saudi Business Machines - SBM
The size of the container used in the deployment is still large and I think it should be improved and become lighter. It would be useful to make container deployment easier . View full review »
Mohamed Osman
Independent Consultant - IT Technician Level 4 / Projects Technician at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The user interface is designed mainly for experts, much in the way a BPM or another integration tool is. The administration console is ok because it's used by the administration team or the technical team. The external interfaces have limitations compared to vertical technologies such as JS frameworks like React or Angular that have lots of capability for UI and UX design. This tool can be challenging when you use it for a really complex solution, or if you try to use it for a purpose other than what it is designed for. For example, using it as a BPM tool will be challenging. View full review »
reviewer991374
Enterprise Architect at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
My biggest complaint about this product is the price. The cost is a significant reason why we're looking at other products right now. Technical support is very slow and needs to be improved. Significant improvement is needed, especially when dealing with a tier-one client. They are just now looking at Cast for their streams product, so they are a bit behind when it comes to technology. I no longer look to IBM for new technology. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in ESB. Updated: August 2020.
437,827 professionals have used our research since 2012.