Microsoft Teams Reviews

I use the solution for chatting at work. 

The solution has calendars that help us to manage work. 

The product needs to improve its stability. 

The solution is stable since it never broke up. It never became a problem. I would rate the product's stability a nine out of ten. 

My company has 200 users for the product. 

I have never used the tool's technical support. 

The solution comes with Windows 11. However, if you use Mac then you need to install it which takes only a couple of minutes to complete. 

I can do the tool's deployment by myself. 

I would rate the product an eight out of ten. 

I use the solution for messaging and chatting. 

The solution needs to improve the APIs. 

I would rate Microsoft Teams stability a nine out of ten. 

We have an internal technical team and at times it gets resolved before escalation. 

The product setup is easy. 

I would rate the solution a seven out of ten. 

We use it for team meetings. We're still in the process of evaluating the solution, however. 

The solution provides very clear conferencing, even on mobile devices. The voice clarity is excellent.

Organizing a meeting is very simple to do.

The solution provides for comfortable use. New users are able to navigate it pretty easily.

The interface of the solution could use improvement. Right now, the gold standard in terms of team conferencing user interfaces seems to be Zoom. Microsoft Teams should see if they could make their interface and usability as simple as that.

It's not as easy to augment your meetings as it is with competitors. For example, in Zoom, if I want to add attendees, I just grab the meeting link and post it to them. With Teams, how to do this is not as clear.

I'm pretty new to Teams. I've only been using it for the past two months or so.

The stability of the solution is good. The product is reliable in that sense. I haven't experienced crashes. There aren't bugs or glitches that disrupt the user experience. 

It's quite easy to scale the solution if you need to. It's possible to add new people into meetings, for example. We haven't had any issues in that sense.

Our IT department is engaging with Microsoft locally. I haven't made contact with technical support personally. As we were offered one free month of service, we're doing some experiments ont he platform.

We are now on Chatter. The entire team is using and Chatter. We have 5,000 Chatter licenses. The entire organization is using it. We are also evaluating Microsoft 365 which includes Teams.

Internally we are using Chatter across the company as of now. We will continue to use Chatter as it is part of our CRM and all the customer and customer service related communication will be through Chatter only. We are planning to use Microsoft Teams as a collaborative platform in the future.

Currently, now the entire communication of the company is between Teams and the corporate office is appraising each solution.

I've used Zoom in the past, as well as WebEx. With Teams, the clarity of the meeting is good, including when you are using it on a wireless device. Zoom, however, has the easiest interface. It's the most popular option currently on the market. Everyone is using Zoom. 

WebEx I wouldn't recommend. It takes a lot of bandwidth and is more difficult to use.

The initial setup was a bit complex. I couldn't really follow it very well.

Microsoft offers new users one free month of service, so it's easy to try it out if you want to.

Currently, we're just a customer of Microsoft. We aren't consultants or resellers.

To be honest, everyone is using Zoom these days. The familiarity with that system is higher, and the recommendation for that system is higher. 

When I set up Microsoft Teams, people were not very accustomed to how to use it. However, users have found that using it on the laptop is pretty good. Overall the system looks good. That said, when you try to use it on mobile, we've found the bandwidth is higher.

Currently, as a new user, I would rate the solution seven out of ten. If the interface was just a bit better, and it was easier to organize a meeting, I would rate it higher. Generally, it just needs to be tweaked to make it more user friendly.

Although we're not fully subscribed to the solution, I would recommend it to others.

I am part of the pre-sales team. The solution helps me to pass collected information to customers through meetings. 

The solution needs to have subtitles. 

The product is stable. 

The solution is scalable. My company has 1008 users for the product. 

I haven't used any support. 

I have used Google Meet but find the UI and function of Teams to be more simple and unique. 

The product's setup is easy. 

The solution offers high integration and is easy. I would rate the solution a seven out of ten. 

We use the solution to communicate between teams. During the COVID pandemic, we used the communication solution. Post that we follow a blended work approach where some of us work on-premises and others at home. The tool helps us to create meetings. 

The tool is very useful since it helps us to share documents and make calls. 

The tool needs to improve its stability. There are issues when too many people use it at the same time. 

We have been using the solution since 2019. 

I would rate the tool's stability an eight out of ten. 

I would rate the solution's scalability a ten out of ten. My company has 40-50 users for the product. 

I have no direct experience with the support. If I have any issues, I talk to my colleagues. 

The solution's deployment was easy and fast and got completed in two days. 

The tool is very useful for us and I would rate it an eight out of ten. 

We use the solution to chat with colleagues. 

The solution helps us to accelerate communication. We use Teams to contact colleagues during emergencies instead of regular electronic phones. It helps to keep everything organized and centralized in the same place. The product is also very easy to use. I am also impressed with the solution's possibility of making quick calls and creating groups. 

The product is not fully integrated in Brazil. 

I have been using the product for more than a year. 

I would rate the product's stability a nine out of ten.

I would rate the product's scalability a nine out of ten. 

The product's deployment is straightforward. 

I would rate the solution a nine out of ten since it depends on the internet connection. I fully recommend users to use all the features of the product. 

We use Microsoft Teams for internal calls and customer-facing calls.

The most valuable features of Microsoft Teams are the calendar integration and the integration of chat and chat history into events. The integration of chat and chat history into events that I don't attend is useful because it allows me to find the dialogue in a call easily. It also allows me to go back and view recording videos.

Microsoft Teams should include better integration of the multi-viewer webinar-type system.

I have been using Microsoft Teams for probably three years now.

Microsoft Teams is a stable solution. I rate Microsoft Teams ten out of ten for stability.

Microsoft Teams is a scalable solution. I rate Microsoft Teams ten out of ten for scalability. Around 1,000 users are using Microsoft Teams in our company.

We previously used Webex and Zoom. We switched to Microsoft Teams exclusively since it is included in the Microsoft package and subscription and has improved features.

The solution’s initial setup is easy.

Microsoft Teams is a cheap solution because it's included in the Microsoft 365 suite.

We are using the latest version of Microsoft Teams. I recommend Microsoft Teams to other users.

Overall, I rate Microsoft Teams an eight out of ten.

We use Teams for customer team meetings and partner team meetings. We also use it for internal communication.

The most valuable feature for me is the chat. It is what I use the most because if I have to reach a team member, given that we are all working remotely, it is the easiest way to do it. 

The user interface needs to be improved. After six months of working with it, I still find the UI a little clunky when it comes to sharing content and moving around between features like the calendar and files. Sometimes, when I'm on a call and somebody asks if I can share a file or a link, I find it clunky to get to where those pieces are. Overall, navigation is a little sticky.

We have been using Microsoft Teams for about six months.

For what we do, it is absolutely stable. We have an enterprise team and it is used constantly.

We have had some fairly large meetings on here and I think that it scales fine.

I have never needed to contact technical support.

Prior to using Teams, we were using WebEx. We still use WebEx from time to time, but for the most part, we use Teams. It is better for us because Teams is integrated with all of the backend Microsoft environment that we already have. For example, we use SharePoint, ShareFile, and others. It has files integrated as well, so we can place internal files for review on Teams.

WebEx is more of a platform just for jumping on a call with a few people.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.