I would rate this solution 7 out of 10.

I would suggest using this solution. Oracle Service Bus is very good. Any organization can use it. So it's very robust and scalable, and its security features are very good.

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten because there are some loopholes in service and support. Sometimes, when we have issues and go to Oracle support, they will not give us solutions. Instead, they will ask for so many log files and emails. The product is good, but the support is not. 

In summary, this is a very complete product and it works well for us.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

I mostly use Oracle products such as Oracle Service Bus, Oracle SOA Suite, and Oracle FMW.

I started with Oracle Service Bus version 10g and 11g, and now I'm using version 12c.

About thirty people use Oracle Service Bus within the company.

I suggest that others look into using Oracle Service Bus because it's one of the most stable products for integration.

I'd rate Oracle Service Bus as seven out of ten because the time to launch is swift, and in terms of integration, it's a stable product.

My company is an Oracle Service Bus customer.

My company has almost a hundred customers, so it has a lot of users of Oracle Service Bus.

Only four people handle the deployment and maintenance of Oracle Service Bus.

I would recommend Oracle Service Bus to people who want to start using it because it could be used for a lot of cases and for a lot of integrations.

My rating for Oracle Service Bus is nine out of ten.

They are now moving towards the cloud. You have to evaluate what your requirements are and what your future strategies are. Based on that, you can go with an on-prem one or a cloud one. Nowadays, many products come with iPass, which is the lighter version or flavor of a product. The lighter flavors are for citizen developers, but if you want to do complex orchestration and build complex integrations, you definitely need a product like this with all the features available.

I'd rate Oracle Service Bus an eight out of ten. 

We aren't using the latest version of the solution. We're working on an older one right now.

After more than a decade of working with the product, I can say that it is a pretty good solution. That said, before buying, a company needs to take into account their overall infrastructure to understand the volume of data they will need to process, et cetera. Based on those requirements, you'll need to find a product that works for you. 

While I like Oracle, there's no denying the support issues. 

Overall, I would rate the solution at a nine out of ten.

My recommendation varies greatly depending on the specific context. Factors such as budget constraints, available personnel for system management, and geographical location play significant roles. It's crucial to consider the unique challenges and resources available in each country or region. For instance, hiring local talent in countries like Argentina, Brazil, or Colombia may present different challenges and salary considerations compared to the UK. Overall, I would rate it seven out of ten.

We're just a customer or end-user.

I'd rate the solution five out of ten.

The product is a part of the Fusion Middleware. We have the full suite including the SOA and WebLogic.

I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten.

If a company wants to go to the Oracle stack, I'd recommend this solution. If a company wants to use it, it should first evaluate their requirements and whether they need to expand or if they have the capacity.

This is a very stable and good product to use. It's essential to have sufficient knowledge around implementation and to deal with thread work management to get better performance. A lot comes with experience but before implementing, it's worth going to Oracle and studying the recommendations around implementation and integration. 

Some improvements are needed around some of the latest technologies and trends, so I rate this solution eight out of 10.

This was a company that was acquired earlier, from DevLogic. Now people are asking for microservices-based architecture which currently is not an option. Especially, they use SOA services. Everything is not microservices-based architecture today. People who have been in banks, telcos, finance companies, even the government, those who have been using it for a long time, are the people probably who are the target audience right now. However, in the future, people are looking at types of services with architecture systems, which currently, SOA is not.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.

I would give this solution a seven out of ten. My advice is to be aware of the amount of space to collect all the requirements because sometimes, maintenance on existing setups can rebuild the servers from the beginning.

This is a good product, not an exceptional product. You could say it's a bit greedy as it requires lots of additional resources because you have to deploy the database and then ESB on top of that. But if you have the resources and people, it's a good product. 

I would rate this product seven out of 10. 

It is a very lightweight product and has great processing speeds.

When I select a vendor to work with, I look for reliability and ease of use. Performance is everything and this has proven itself over the years. That's why we keep using it.

The suitability of this solution depends on the customer's environment and requirements. For situations where they are many integration points, whether they are on-premises or in the cloud, this is a good solution.

Overall, this is a good solution from the user's perspective, but it is a little bit complex to manage.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

To choose this solution would depend on company priorities. If someone is looking for a highly scalable solution with security features embedded there are many other options available. If the case scenario is a customer who is already using Oracle Stack and has a good relationship with Oracle then I would recommend OSB if they can survive with the built-in security model. I would definitely recommend it for some customers.

I rate this product seven out of 10. 

Oracle a good product. It can be used for the integration of this solution.

I have only received positive feedback for this solution. The features are good. It's sufficient for us.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

I'm not a customer. I represent a company in charge of integrating solutions for customers, specifically for our customers. We're a partner and implementor.

In general, I would rate the solution at an eight out of ten. Even with the difficulties around licensing, the solution itself is quite good and reliable.

Overall, this product is quite good and I feel comfortable when I use it.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

When selecting a vendor, at least from the architecture and the developer's standpoints, looking at the implementation and scalability are the two most important things.

Oracle provides good documentation, look through that. This solution is advisable when you need some kind of layer in between, so that it acts as middleware for different systems. That's where you will need to use this.

My advice to anybody who is implementing this solution is to study the architecture that they want to implement very well. That way, they won't have to have repeated flows that do the same work.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

I rate Oracle Service Bus six out of 10. OSB isn't suitable for working with modern applications. We can use it for a monolithic application, not in microservices techniques. 

I would recommend this solution for large enterprises.

I would rate Oracle Service Bus a nine out of ten.