We use the solution on-premises so there is no need for scaling. 

We have not had any scalability issues so far.

Our organization has also tried other CI/CD tools. There are areas where this tool has been lacking, which is why alternatives are being looked into. From a scalability point of view, I'm rating it a six out of ten.

We have encountered scalability issues. We did not scale particularly well. We have not been able to maintain a cluster with 3 servers in UCD. When running with 3 servers, we have experienced instability and agent connectivity issues.

The tool's performance goes down when the number of simultaneous users increases.

The current version that we have, the 6 series, does not scale at all. It is not good enough, in my opinion. They knew this and they have upgraded this with a whole new technology. We do not need it to scale any further at this moment.

It's absolutely scalable. We have gone from about 17 products to 32, maybe it was 42 since we've gotten uDeploy. Before it could take a couple of days and we could only do a few deployments, just barely a few in a month. Now we can do multiple deployments in a day, we can get hotfixes out very quickly, and we can easily modify and customize processes as the needs of the teams change. It scales very well for us. We also, for instance, have needed to improve our security and all that is there in uDeploy. We don't have to do anything other than figure out how to configure it.

This solution is very easy to scale. We have between 300 and 400 users and we have had no issues at all. Our development and support teams have access to this tool, although there are only four or five of us with administrator access.

We have not encountered any scalability issues.

We're in the process of moving pretty much most of our codes to run through it one way or another. I anticipate it will scale well.

We've had no issues scaling it.

It's scaled fine for what we need it to do. We have over a hundred applications configured in it.

No - scalability is handled via client relays which offload the server's work to proxies.

We have had no issues scaling it for our needs.

We've been able to scale sufficiently.

Currently a single node is sufficient for our needs, so scalability has not been an issue.

I have encountered scalability; the artifact's clean-up policy is not efficient, so it takes up a huge amount of storage.

Also, when you have a large number of components in the same application, the deployment take-off is very slow. I assume it fetches the current inventory and compares it against the requested version.

The tool is capable of handling the load. The single application server was handling 50-70 applications which were quite complex in nature.

We have not had scalability issues.

Yes, with this particular product it is important to heed the provided best practices for inventory management and server specs - the larger the installation footprint, the more quickly the internal database size and repository size will grow if not managed appropriately.

We have had no issues scaling it.

If you really want to scale up, it's going to get a little complicated. You'll have to do some configurations to make it work. High scalability is a little complex with UrbanCode Deploy.

Overall, the scalability is good, but it's complex.

No issues encountered.