We performed a comparison between Cegid, SAP HCM, and SAP SuccessFactors based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Workday, Oracle and others in Talent Management."The solution has a great payroll engine."
"The most valuable feature is you can customize every type of payroll calculation that you have."
"The most valuable features of Meta4 are payroll and resource recruitment. However, all of the features in the human resource system are useful."
"The tool provides a lot of options."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the payment engine."
"Performance appraisal might be the most valuable feature for us."
"The support team were friendly and work in a systematic way. When contacting support you are able to add a level of priority to your case which is always respected by their team."
"The performance appraisal is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature is the Personnel Administration."
"All of the core processes are very valuable aspects of the solution. These include personnel, administration, organizational structure, and payroll."
"SAP HCM has a good performance."
"All our employee data, like performance and payroll, is managed through SAP HCM."
"I think HCM was the most stable for me...It is a very scalable product."
"The user interface is the solution's most valuable feature. It makes it easy for us to use."
"The setup was straightforward."
"The technical support is quite good."
"What I appreciate most about SAP SuccessFactors is that it has all the modules in one platform. SAP SuccessFactors is the best option in the market for HR use cases. I also find the solution user-friendly."
"The self-service part is most valuable. Employees and managers can do a lot of things on their own, and they are not dependent on the HR organization."
"What I like the most is the KPI management formula."
"The most valuable features of the solution are GUI and OData API."
"This solution provides up with an easy way to on/off-board staff, as well as actioning internal transfers."
"This solution offers good flexibility and configurability. It can handle different types of performance management."
"I think it's perfect that every requirement has flexibility in how it is handled, and that there are several workarounds for any problem we are looking to solve. Each problem has multiple solutions, so it gives us a lot of flexibility in terms of processes."
"In terms of user experience, it is quite good."
"The HR portal, training model, and the development career model all need improvement."
"training and performance could be improved."
"Meta4 could improve by allowing users to manage things by themself."
"I would like to have recruitment and acquisition features added to this solution."
"The HR portal, training model, and development career model could all use improvement. Stability and scalability should be improved as well."
"The user interface could be improved and the maintenance is complex when it comes to upgrades."
"In future releases, it would be useful to see reporting lines of all the team members in our business to understand who reports to whom."
"The solution is a little bit slow."
"There needs to be a renovation of the interface and functionalities of the talent management modules."
"SAP now does the most innovation for the cloud solution and less innovation for the on-premises client."
"It was difficult to deploy. There were challenges regarding configurations and implementation. So, we had a lot of issues."
"The extensibility of the integration could be improved."
"SAP HCM's long and tedious transactions can be improved."
"Managing changes in applications can be challenging since it complicates testing and unit testing, resulting in longer testing phases. This time-consuming process often leaves little room for actual work."
"It needs a lot of end user training as it is not intuitive at all."
"Its reporting feature could have customization options."
"The complete integration process between SuccessFactors modules is not at the level that all customers expect when it comes to complete HR user experience from all angles."
"I find that the website sometimes has problems loading, but I'm unsure if it's an issue with SuccessFactors. After the login, there are some connection issues. We get some errors telling us that it cannot connect to the host."
"There should be more connectivity with other systems."
"The SAP SuccessFactors updates need to be more industry-specific because every industry has specific modules. What I want to be added to SAP SuccessFactors is a chat box where SAP staff can give support to users."
"SAP SuccessFactors functionality doesn't meet the expectation of our end users. There are other solutions that have better functionality, such as Workday, which is one of the top applications. Additionally, the solution could be easier to use."
"The Reporting/Analytics and User Interface need improvement."
"Overall, the documentation could be improved, and I think the learning management module needs to include more capabilities when it comes to matching an organization's particular learning approach."
"The product doesn't have a modernized look and is not very user-friendly like other products."