Cisco Wireless Pricing
PS
reviewer1486461
Technology Specialist at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
It's expensive because a lot of the controls come with licenses. A couple of my controls have 15 or 25 access point licenses. And if it's in a building that I need more, then I have to go out to a vendor and be able to purchase the add-on license and then pop it in. It's not bad putting a license in, it's just the biggest complaint I have about Cisco is the cost.
Right now there's no subscription. That's the other thing I like about it. We buy it and that's it. The only thing I purchase is the SMARTnet that allows me to do software upgrades for my equipment. I'm paying about $6,000 or $7,000 a year in SMARTnet contracts for that support. Basically, I use it more for the software updates that allow me to keep everything up to date.
View full review »The pricing is reasonable. We license the APs and not the controllers.
View full review »LM
Lorenzo Mata
Network Engineer at County of victoria
Cisco's APs are licensed and you need to buy them. Basically, for every AP, you have to have a license. Some of the other devices do it so that they support X amount and you can buy the licenses for zero to 20, 20 to 40, et cetera, and it's a little bit more affordable. That's kind of why I was trending towards Ruckus. They handle their licensing a little bit differently.
Every time somebody asks "How much is a wireless access point? We need wireless in this room." Well, then you tell them the cost and mention "Oh yeah, and there's a license." It's expensive.
Users purchase each AP, and that's until the end of that product's life. If you break it down over a year, it's fairly affordable. However, nobody replaces one AP, we replace them all typically at the same time. Unless one dies or they need one expanded, as far as specific costs go, it's different for indoor and outdoor ones. It might be around $100 for a license. The internal ones are far cheaper than that.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Cisco Wireless
May 2024
Learn what your peers think about Cisco Wireless. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2024.
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Its cost is a little bit higher than other products. Fortinet and Huawei are cheaper. If we were not a bank, I would go for Huawei or Fortinet because they are cheap, and I don't need that much security. A financial institute, a university, or a medical institute would need security to protect the customer data. That's why we buy this high-end product that has integrated security features.
View full review »The price of Cisco Wireless is the same as that offered by Huawei.
Presently, there is no difference in the prices between Cisco and Huawei.
There is a need to renew the licenses for Cisco Wireless every three years. My company needs to pay around 25 percent of the budget meant for the tools we purchase towards the price of Cisco Wireless.
The payment made towards the licensing is not for the operational purpose of the product but towards the support, which is why it may come across as an expensive product to many.
This solution is expensive, but you get value for your money.
Cisco is not cheap. That's actually an understatement. Our Cisco partners want us to partner with Cisco Meraki solutions because their cloud platform is monthly-based. We pay roughly $2,000 a year with our current subscription.
View full review »The product is expensive.
RM
Randy Mullins
Supervisor, Technology at Tcps
We opt for a one-time purchasing fee model in our setup. Since we don't utilize a management platform or WLAN controller, there are no recurring costs. The access points we typically use, which support Cisco's wireless masters, are priced at around $250 each. Occasionally, we purchase them in packs of five or as part of extended packs at a prorated cost.
View full review »DD
Domagoj Dujmić
Network engineer at Teva Pharmaceuticals
Cisco is on the expensive side.
I'd rate the product a three out of five in terms of affordability of the product.
They could improve their lead times. The wait time for their equipment is very long now and the pricing is very steep for Cisco.
View full review »JM
Jhon Montoya
Engineer at Comunidad Cristiana Misioneros San Wenceslao
The licensing is expensive. The cost of licenses is expensive, as are other solutions. When we have a project, we have to clarify to our financial staff why we chose Cisco, as there are other, cheaper solutions. The cost of equipment is expensive.
For example, for new brand equipment, Cisco Wireless equipment, it costs $1,500 for one piece of equipment. That includes licenses, installation, and equipment.
IT
Ibrahima Thioub
Technology Manager at International School Of Dakar
We have 10 Cisco 1552E and i ordered 10 more.
Now, i have the release for 8.0 and 8.5 for my wlc but i stay with 7.4.100 software version.
I will stay with Cisco and see next time Insha ALLAH.
The coverage will be extended and the dead zones will be covered.
View full review »DH
Dennis Horsch
Advisor at Flex Office 365
The product is nearly too expensive in terms of quality. It varies depending on the project’s scope and specific requirements. Prices range from around 5000 euros to 30,000 for larger, more complex implementations.
It was expensive. Considering the challenges faced in third-world countries like Pakistan or India, cheaper solutions are preferred. Huawei, for example, is much cheaper compared to Cisco.
We use an annual license model.
View full review »HH
Housni Hammoud
Coordinator of the IT Department at College Notre-Dame
The licensing system is very rigid. I work for a school and we are just treated like big companies. At some point, there's a limit to what we can do about that.
I can't remember what we paid for the equipment, though in the end we bought some extra switches from an aftermarket company. We started doing our own replacing of equipment, which we didn't really use. The SMARTnet contract was only for the core switch and the Wi-Fi controllers, and we didn't go that way for the rest of the equipment.
If we had, it would have cost something around $2000-$3000 per switch, and we have 30 of them, so it wouldn't have been affordable for us.
The solution is very costly.
View full review »I rate the product price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price.
TM
Terry Malensek
Network Architect at Summa Health System
I don't handle the pricing. I don't have it in front of me. I'm not sure what the monthly costs are for our organization.
View full review »The product is expensive. I rate the pricing a ten out of ten. We are dependent on the dollar. There is a global economic issue.
View full review »Cisco is a bit pricey compared to other vendors like Ruckus which have pretty decent pricing. If a customer asks me for a cost-effective solution, I may go with Huawei but if it's in the enterprise dev environment, then I'd go with Cisco, Aruba, or Ruckus as a third choice.
View full review »VG
reviewer973995
Manager at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
Cisco Wireless is complex, and it's not cost-effective.
View full review »RE
reviewer2356428
Lead Network Engineer at a energy/utilities company with 5,001-10,000 employees
I rate the tool's pricing a ten out of ten. It is expensive compared to Aruba and Juniper.
View full review »Cisco’s pricing is top ranking in the market and the competition out of 300 products. It is moderate. Cisco Wireless has a complex licensing model. While some features are offered without a license for integration and central management, others require licensing for activation. SmartNet support and other tools are also necessary, adding to the complexity. Segregating the costs into one-time payments for integration licenses and separate payments for SmartNet could reduce overall costs.
View full review »RR
RobiyantoRobi
Information Technology Infrastructure Team Lead at Saptaindra
The pricing is a bit high, and I would rate it a six on a scale of one to ten, with ten being the most expensive.
It is an expensive product. I would rate the pricing a nine out of ten, with ten being expensive.
View full review »PV
reviewer2223285
Data Communications Manager at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
I rate the tool's pricing a seven out of ten.
View full review »Its price is a bit high. It is more expensive than its competitors, but when I look at the return on investment, it is worth it.
View full review »We have to pay for the hardware and support is extra and we do pay for the support.
View full review »JA
reviewer1621029
Domain Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
With the new licensing model, the DNA licensing model, it's a bit on the expensive side. It used to have an option for the perpetual and subscription-based models, however, now they've started pushing you to the subscription models.
View full review »YK
Yafar Khan
Senior Network Engineer at a museum or institution with 501-1,000 employees
The solution is a little expensive compared to other brands.
View full review »The price of Cisco Wireless equipment is expensive.
Cisco has introduced a subscription pricing model where you have to always pay and renew.
View full review »TW
reviewer934653
Mgr - Applications Enterprise Applications at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
I don't know the details about the pricing. Typically it just gets lumped into my project. So I'm not sure what we're paying in licensing fees.
View full review »DP
Danya Philip
Network Engineer at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The product is quite expensive, and it's making us reconsider staying with Cisco.
View full review »The license structure is confusing.
View full review »DG
reviewer935628
Sr.Manager at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
We have a yearly license.
View full review »The platform is expensive for small-scale businesses. There are no extra costs included. We can add essential features to the on-premise version as required.
I rate the pricing an eight or nine out of ten.
IT
Ibrahima Thioub
Technology Manager at International School Of Dakar
Cisco Wireless solutions should have a price reduction for educations centers. Education centers are there to help people grow and there are not large budgets. The solution tends to be expensive and it can cause difficulties when purchasing them here in Africa.
View full review »DO
Diego Otheguy
Gerente División Plataforma at Sonda S.A.
The cost of the solution is quite high in our region. It would be better if they could take cost into consideration in Latin America to make it more reasonable for local companies.
View full review »Expensive.
View full review »DP
Dev-Patel
Consultant at Lifeline IT
Users have to pay a yearly licensing fee for Cisco Wireless.
View full review »AS
reviewer1520502
Technology Architect at a construction company with 10,001+ employees
Its licensing is not simple. There are additional license costs for features, which is frustrating for us. There are some features that are included for free in the base Aruba product, but they are available at additional costs in this solution.
View full review »RR
Ravi Ramachandran
Senior Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Cisco licensing is usually provided for 1 year, 3 years, or 5 years. You can get a hardware SLA or hardware and software SLA for a period of 5 years. Longer terms of SLA influences the pricing.
License pricing also depends on the features that are being used.
WS
WillySmith
Support at Za irery
Cisco Wireless is expensive.
View full review »The cost of the solution is quite high.
Clients can pay a licensing fee on a monthly basis.
Any extra fees would depend on the individual client projects.
View full review »YA
YaserAltwailey
Network Engineer at Saudi Customs
We do not need to pay a licensing fee to Cisco.
View full review »LT
Luis Adrián Acurio
Telecommunications Specialistde Telecomunicaciones at Telalca
The price is a little high. However, you get what you pay for. The quality of the product is high, you will find it is worth the money. There is some additional cost, for example, customer support.
View full review »DR
reviewer1361055
DPKO at a government with 10,001+ employees
Cisco has changed their licensing mode and they've become very expensive.
View full review »RK
reviewer1650075
Operations Manager at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees
The price of the solution is fair.
View full review »AD
reviewer1447938
Chief of Systems at a mining and metals company with 5,001-10,000 employees
The price of this solution is a little more than competitors.
View full review »The price of Cisco Wireless is in the high range compared to other solutions. The solution could be less expensive.
View full review »AL
Ali Liaqat
Executive at FFC
There are no subscription fees.
View full review »FS
FawziSIYOUCEF
Senior Network Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
As far as pricing and licensing go it really depends. I think that it would be better to have more flexible licensing mostly for our clients because then we could commercialize those solutions and position them for a more broader market segment. The pricing depends on the size of the project and the support from the client side.
View full review »As far as I know Cisco is very competitive, price-wise.
Talk to your third-party vendor. It all depends on the company size - how many employees, how big the building is. If it's wireless, and you have only 50 employees but you're using a large building floor, in that case you need many access points. But if you have 50 employees using two or three rooms, then you probably don't need it and it's going to be high density, so there is a different design. So you need to talk to a subject matter expert. Talk to them and design accordingly.
CR
reviewer1516401
Telecom/Networking Analyst at a religious institution with 1,001-5,000 employees
The price for this product is a little bit high, which is why I am not using the most recent version. Rather, I look for products there are mid-ranged, being not too old or too new.
The licensing fee is yearly.
View full review »We have two controllers in our 55 offices with more than 175 APs. It costs us around 100k. Currently we don't buy any support from OEM or a vendor, and we keep all necessary APs in stock. For the controller it costs us around 3k yearly.
View full review »MN
MuhammadNaeem
Network & Information Security Engineer at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The licensing is usually for an average of three years, depending on what we buy.
There may be some add-ons that could cost a bit more.
While, typically, Cisco is a little bit more costly, the costs also depend on your relationship with Cisco.
DT
דוד טל
CEO at Dinet Systems Ltd
I think it's affordable. Maybe there are little differences, but it's not very expensive. But with all Cisco products, you have to pay more for the power supply. You'll have to pay for the PoE converter.
View full review »The initial set-up cost including the device was approximately $7500. There is no day-to-day cost besides the power it uses since the device just about maintains itself. Unless adding new APs or subnets to the wireless network there is no need to touch the controller really.
View full review »US
reviewer1567812
Senior Manager, Information Technology at a university with 201-500 employees
We use the product under an educational license, and therefore, we find the solution to be reasonably priced.
View full review »SS
Shrijendra Shakya
C.T.O at Sastra Network Solution Inc. Pvt. Ltd.
The pricing depends on the requirement, so proper planning and an RF analysis help to properly size the solution and get the best pricing.
View full review »CC
reviewer1328712
Cisco Network Engineer at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Cost is one of the reasons why we are switching to Aruba. Aruba is significantly lower than Cisco in price.
We do the licensing on a three-year basis. Cisco makes licensing very difficult.
View full review »Pricing is a little higher for Cisco Wireless than all other vendors. Cisco should work on improving the pricing because there are some other vendors out there in the market which may have the same features or equivalent features that Cisco has at a lesser price.
WK
Wojciech Kaczor
Board Member and Co-Owner at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
They have different products which can be used by some customers, from small and medium to large enterprises. The portfolio is very wide. It's difficult to say if they are expensive or not as they have expensive products, however, they are very scalable and great for very large objects.
Maybe they are a little bit above the average on the market, however, for what you get, mostly it's worth it.
View full review »GG
reviewer1571142
Network Consultant at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Its licensing is hard to understand.
View full review »TA
Tareq Alansari
Manager at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
It's good to compare pricing, but it's Cisco and I trust Cisco.
View full review »This product's pricing is good. It's not too expensive.
Whether the pricing is a good value depends on the product. I was looking for some Cisco products and found that some are expensive, like the Cisco Spectrum Expert Wireless adapter.
Approximately $20,000 with no additional costs.
View full review »TT
Thuy Truong
Administrator at SOURTHERN WAVES Solution
The product is expensive.
View full review »SP
Sachin Patange
Network and Security Engineer at SK international
From a pricing point of view, it's a little bit expensive compared to competitors like Aruba and others. But the product is also very promising and very stable. The hardware is wonderful. As a system integrator, it's okay, but you'll probably see it as expensive as a customer.
View full review »AA
reviewer1465872
Head of IT Infrastructure at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
Our procurement team handles the contracts for this solution. Therefore, I don't have any insights into pricing.
View full review »ND
Nabin Dev
CCIE, Sr. Network Engineer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Pricing is a bit on the high side compared to its competitors but we have to consider the support and usages of the solution.
Licensing is now RTU and smart licensing. We need three types of licenses, one for the:
- APs
- HA
- controller.
MR
reviewer1768326
It specialist
The pricing is on the high side. For example, it is more expensive to use than Aruba.
We have a license, however, I do not manage it.
View full review »MA
Mateen Ahmad
Safety Officer at Tata Consultancy
Because the Cisco architecture is quite complex, you may end up having to add more components and licenses. So, the cost could go up.
View full review »HS
Henrik Stoklund
IT Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
The price of this product is reasonable.
View full review »AA
reviewer1125813
IT Support Team Leader at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
There is no license required to use Cisco Wireless solutions.
View full review »MC
Manoj Chitgopeker
Region Head - S1@Dimension Data India at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
We are on an annual license. The license and the hardware are expensive.
View full review »PD
Phil Durgin
Owner at JOAT
Don't use Cisco Meraki. While pretty, the devices and licensing aren't worth the cost.
CR
Claudio Rosa
System Engineer at a mining and metals company with 10,001+ employees
It is an expensive solution.
View full review »TN
reviewer1678209
IT Manager at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
The price of Cisco Wireless is expensive and there is an additional cost for support.
View full review »JO
JOHNOKUNADE
Network Support Engineer at Nigeria LNG Limited
DH
Dániel Halmai
Head of IT Network Division at Panorinformatika
I believe licensing is paid on a monthly basis.
View full review »MK
reviewer1380057
Solutions Architect at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
The pricing of the solution is little expensive if you compare it to other competitors.
View full review »SS
Supattra Smithsirikajone
Senior Technical Consultant at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
I think that the solution is expensive because the customer has to pay for a full year, at a minimum, in up-front costs.
View full review »The pricing on the Cisco devices can seem high, but compare apples with apples and it will become clear that Cisco is not that expensive. The controllers need to have licenses for the access points that it manages, so plan ahead and have enough licenses ready for the amount of access points in the environment.
View full review »NM
reviewer1162332
Owner at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Cisco is not a cheap solution. Their licensing cost is higher than that for others.
If you want to upgrade it in the future, the licensing cost will be high. I think that in the future, Cisco will be based more on software rather than hardware. This means that you will have to pay more for licensing.
The Cisco solution has been quite reliable because it's more hardware based, but now because it's becoming more software based, the hardware might cost slightly less. However, because of COVID and the shortage of chips, this does not really apply.
View full review »IC
reviewer1646865
ICT Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Cisco is costlier relative to other solutions.
View full review »TX
reviewer1467366
IT at a manufacturing company with 201-500 employees
The solution is quite expensive. It doesn't offer the best pricing on the market. There are cheaper options.
View full review »EO
EmilioOgando
Integration Manager at Newcom
The price of Cisco Wireless could be lower.
View full review »AM
reviewer1778529
Technical Operations Manager at a media company with 201-500 employees
The price of Cisco Wireless could be adjusted down, it is a bit expensive. The solution is worth it for the name and the brand. However, there are more products now in the market that give you the same quality, but at a cheaper price.
View full review »YS
reviewer938022
Lead Presales at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
There are annual subscriptions to use this solution. I have not been able to understand the licensing of Cisco. Some of the Cisco executives were not able to understand them either. When you first start out the price is zero but when it comes to a time of renewal you have to pay.
I cannot say the solution should be cheaper because it has a good price point. It is not that they are very expensive, but compared to other solutions available in the market they are expensive. However, they are premium products that make the price suitable for what benefits you receive.
View full review »GV
reviewer1579173
ICT Diensthoofd - Head of ICT at a healthcare company with 501-1,000 employees
It's expensive. The pricing is an obstacle.
View full review »WL
reviewer1570290
Solution Manager, Network at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
The cost of the product is rather high. It's one of the downsides.
View full review »SP
reviewer1593852
ICT Infrastructure Architect at a energy/utilities company with 501-1,000 employees
It is expensive, and there are some costs in addition to the standard licensing fee. Its licensing model and cost should be improved.
View full review »JC
reviewer1559886
Principal Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Cisco has several pricing models. I think things have gotten more expensive due to the economic climate around COVID and things like that for most vendors now.
Everybody is price-sensitive. I'm just the partner, so I'm looking at the solutions for the client. I'm not the customer. The customer, obviously, would say cheap is better and because a lot of people are price sensitive now they're trying to get as much value as they can at a good price.
View full review »I feel the product's pricing is a good value.
View full review »The pricing is okay. I believe it is competitively priced. But it is not just the price by itself, it's the price and the technical features. The features also play a big role. It has to give me the relevant output. That is more important. Price is secondary. Price will not play a very big role because if it does not deliver what I need... For example, if I were to buy a car without an engine, that's still a car, but it is of no use. I might as well buy a car that works.
They have simplified the licensing. Now there is a single license that is required. Earlier, multiple licenses were required. Single licensing is good. As a customer, I don't need to keep an inventory of multiple licenses.
View full review »The pricing is high. It could be cheaper. Cisco is known for its high pricing.
View full review »WW
Wesley Wang
DevOps System Engineer at Monash University
The solution does not come with a licensing fee.
View full review »CU
Can Unal
Professional Services Manager at DESTEK Bilgisayar ve İletisim Hizmetleri Tic. A.S.
It's a bit expensive but it's professional and works properly.
View full review »Never pay the full GPL price.
View full review »No day-to-day cost.
View full review »MP
reviewer1112427
Enterprise Architect at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
I don't work with the commercial side, I don't have any estimate on the cost.
That said, I do know that it is more expensive than other options.
View full review »PS
reviewer1439676
System Administrator at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
This is an expensive product.
View full review »I am not a fan of Cisco's software pricing model. Their management software is far too expensive.
View full review »AR
reviewer1454613
VP of IT at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Cisco Wireless is a little bit expensive when compared to other solutions.
View full review »MO
reviewer1307829
Technical Support Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
The product could be priced better.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Cisco Wireless
May 2024
Learn what your peers think about Cisco Wireless. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2024.
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.