We haven't experienced any downtime. I would rate the stability of the solution design, considering that Mule supports the solution. It's around eight out of ten because it's stable for now. However, we haven't looked at the concurrency at this point, but the volume of transactions going via Mule is relatively low. So, for now, it's stable. But we have to consider stability when we have huge volumes of more endpoints and applications onboarded and in use. But for now, it's stable.

I rate the tool’s stability a nine out of ten.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a seven to eight out of ten.

The stability Mule Anypoint Platform is good. It is highly reliable.

The current stability is excellent.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

The stability is getting better and continues to improve, however, previous versions were quite unstable. 

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is a highly stable solution. I have worked for almost two years, and only twice did I see the platform go down for five to ten minutes.

I rate MuleSoft Anypoint Platform ten out of ten for stability.

The solution is stable. 

Mule Anypoint Platform is a stable solution.

Mule Anypoint Platform is a pretty stable solution.

I rate the solution a nine out of ten for stability.

The solution has threading, but it has the interpreter feature which I think slows it down.

I would rate the stability of the platform a seven out of ten. There were situations where specific solutions or connectors were not available, and the support team suggested using workarounds. They advised me to create my own ideas and come up with a solution. This lack of immediate solutions can be a limitation of the platform.

The solution's stability has increased over time. 

I rate Mule Anypoint Platform a nine out of ten for stability.

Mule Anypoint Platform is a stable product.

It is a stable product.

Mule Anypoint Platform is quite stable. It is used across many large organizations, and we have not seen many issues with it. I would rate the stability eight out of ten.

The stability of the Mule Anypoint Platform is excellent.

I rate the stability of the Mule Anypoint Platform a ten out of ten.

The solution is stable. 

The stability is another thing on MuleSoft that can be improved. They introduced connectors for other platforms and sometimes the connectors are not great quality and they are not very robust. So that affects the stability and is an area where stability and the product overall could be improved as well. It isn't the product itself as much as the integration opportunities. The volume of products that the solution works with in one release version is affected when the platform changes. When they change to a new version all-of-a-sudden the connector doesn't work or works poorly. That can cause stability issues. Basically, when they roll out a new version, it seems they simply don't make enough consideration and do enough testing as to how it affects the compatibility with the connectors.

I rate Mule Anypoint Platform's stability a nine out of ten. 

We are not using the latest version of the solution. We are using the older version. That said, it is stable. There are no bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze. It is reliable. 

If a person understands the solution, it'll be very easy for them to handle it. However, if someone who doesn't know it, for example, tries to debug it, will find it confusing. 

We have found the solution to be quite stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

The solution is stable.

We haven't used the solution for too long. That said, it seems stable. It is early to make that determination as we've only been using it for about five months. However, there haven't been any bugs or glitches and it doesn't seem to crash or freeze at all.

I was recently researching the cost of scalability purposes in the cloud. For vertical scaling, it's good but the horizontal scaling along with the enterprise is not very good. Horizontal scaling is good in the on-prem system. But I think this is a limitation in all the cloud services providers. That's why the hybrid version is the buzzword nowadays, but for horizontal scalability, the on-prem servers are more flexible and in your control.

Compared to the previous version, this version is stable.

The scalability in general is good. We don't see any issues. There aren't bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's very reliable. 

This is absolutely a stable product. It is going to stay for a long time.

The solution is stable. We haven't had any serious technical problems.

The solution has proven to be quite stable so far. there are no bugs or glitches that I have experienced and the solution does not crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

The stability is good although we sometimes face issues with debugging and Java errors that we get in the Mule runtime. Batch components and debugging require Java knowledge. I know that the interfaces you find on some other products are more stable than this and our issues come from the Java troubleshooting and monitoring. 

It is pretty stable. We don't have any issues with its performance.

It is a stable product.

None.

There was an issue in the previous version, 3.6. They have improved and it has been stable since version 3.7.