The scalability has been good. 

It is changing so quickly customers can't keep up. There's no proper roadmap planning that allows customers to skip a version. They shouldn't just release a version to be competitive. They need to only release a version when everything works properly.

It's scalable. That said, it boils down to the regional requirements since we are using it globally. So when you go to the different regions, you need to do your customizations there. 

We have about 5,000 users on the solution, and we will likely increase the user base over time. 

It is a scalable solution. I rate it eight out of ten. Currently, 500 users are using the solution.

It's scalable. I would rate it an eight out of ten in terms of scalability.

The scalability of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is very good. You can have a lot of users using the solution, such as 20,000, and run multiple companies and languages.

I was told that the solution can scale well. In terms of how well that has been received, I can't comment. I haven't heard of any scaling happening just yet.

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is a scalable solution. More than 100 users are using the solution in our organization.

The solution is scalable and easy to integrate with others. It can extend to many things, including interfacing with other applications and API-based interfacing through databases. Approximately 150 people, from operators to the CEO, are currently utilizing the solution across different countries, including Bahrain, Singapore, U.S. and Australia. I rate the scalability an eight out of ten.

The product can scale. If you are too big or too small for the solution, if you are something like Coca-Cola worldwide, you would not use JD Edwards solely for all activities. They're too big. If you are a company of, let's say 10 employees, then you're too small. However, otherwise, if you choose right, it's very easy to set it up and it's scalable. If you are going from, let's say 200 to 500 employees, no problem. If you have two sites and you're growing to five production sites, also no problem.

The solution is scalable. We already have a scaled version of it.

We have around 5,000 users right now.

You can scale the solution if you need to. 

It is very scalable. The client I'm currently working with has about a thousand users, but I've worked with other clients with a lot more users, such as about 5,000 or so, across different geographies.

There is currently no plan to increase its usage.

The scalability of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is good.

We have approximately 40 clients using

It can scale if architected well. It is highly configurable, and it is dependent on how a customer chooses to set it up. It is built to scale for 5,000 users. It is not really a limit, but 5,000 or less is where it performs well.

The scalability of the product is not great. Some users are more comfortable with SAP as compared to JD Edwards. Our clients are generally medium-sized enterprises. I rate the scalability a five out of ten.

The solution is scalable. Our business can scale up for our customers as we start from the video on live message all the way to the back end.

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne scalability is good. You can host the solution on an on-premise machine. You can also install it on the cloud. When you install JD Edwards EnterpriseOne on the cloud, you can scale it whenever, so its scalability level still depends on your architecture and infrastructure.

Regarding scalability, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is a nine out of ten.

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is best suited for small and medium business enterprises. There are multiple features in the solution that customers look for and this is why it has been a good solution for the past 30 to 35 years in the market.

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is a scalable solution.

When it comes to scalability, a much larger team is needed to handle the system than would otherwise be the case with an SAP solution.

The solution is used extensively in our organization. 

It is absolutely easy to scale this product. We have about ten users in the company.

It can be scalable to any extent. There are no issues and no boundaries. We find for J.D. Edwards to scale. It can serve small medium and large enterprises at the same time.

My current project is a US project, and I can tell you that we have a team of about 250 people. 250 people, but not all of them in JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. We have nearly 50 people in different teams at JD Edwards EnterpriseOne.

There are many more in this project. I'm not sure if there are any other projects that are using this product. But there are several projects, but I'm only going to tell you about my current project.

JD EnterpriseOne's product is simple to use and understand. When it comes to ERP technology, there are many models, all of them, that have been widely used in the United States, first and foremost, and it is developed are with the needs of the US clients in mind.

We're still investigating whether it will scale. We've only been live for six weeks, so it's a critical product that's being highly reviewed. But we're taking it one step at a time.

The scalability is good. 

EnterpriseOne is scalable for large enterprises.

Scalability is good. We can do a lot without any problems. We have about 600 people using this solution.

We are having a few issues with scalability bringing other individuals into the same purchase order. This is something that needs to be improved.

I did not encounter any issues with scalability.

We did not have any problems with the scalability of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne.

We had a large number of people using the solution in many countries.

It's also very good. It runs on different platforms, so you can pick and choose which hardware system you would like for whatever scale of company you are. I used to work for a very large oil company that ran it for about 15,000 people. I know that there's companies larger than that, as well.

It's been able to scale for our needs and we've had no issues with scaling.

As far as scalability goes, we're a very small company, but we were able to implement the portions of the program that we needed. Other than that okay button for the printing, we're able to bypass features that we don't need because we're not a big company. And because of the way it's designed with processing options and version and things like that, we can tailor it for our business needs. As we've grown, we've added new functionalities and we've done a few mods. 

So it's been growing with us. I think we have a long ways to go. We're still a small company and we were probably the smallest customer at the time when we implemented. We're probably not anymore, but we're still very small as far as the arena, so we have a long ways to go before we outgrow it.

We own all licenses for our SIG-code industry. Everything that has to do with oil & gas and chemicals, we own all the modules. We've expanded to the point where we've bought everything. We're able to scale without any issue.

It came out of the box and that's how we do our business. We haven't really had to scale it yet.

It's scalable. You can start with a very small company, add bits to it, and it grows naturally with what your requirements are. Disks are cheap and you can use the same JD Edwards software as you get more complicated. The software gets more complicated with your requirements. It tries to answer everybody's needs as much as it can. You can sit on almost any platform, add more disc, add more users, and the product works very well whether you've got 10, 100, or 1000. Obviously, there's a cost associated with that, but straight out of the box, it's a very scalable tool.

About a year ago, we did an upgrade where we brought on two new facilities, so we had two existing plant locations and we upgraded our system and then brought them all online within a month. We added probably double the amount of users within a month and we didn't experience any system downtime as a result. As far as I know, they might have and not told us. I was still a user at that time. So, from my perspective, we've had no issues with scalability.

The solution is scalable.

No.

We have not encountered any scalability issues.

I did not encounter any issues with scalability.

We have not really had any scalability issues.

There are always scalability issues. But, as a JD Edwards technician, I support the hardware sales, and I am responsible for performing Dimensioning (or "Platform Sizing") platform.

We did not have any scalability issues.

We have not had any scalability issues.

No

We encountered issues with scalability. This was mostly because of our old version, E8.11.

We have not had scalability issues.